Peru 8K HDR 60FPS (FUHD)
Jacob + Katie SchwarzCited 3× on HN, 2019-2025
63.8M views · 9 years ago · other · dated
A travel video of Peru shot natively in 8K HDR at 60fps on a Red Helium sensor. It covers Lima, the Amazon, Cusco and other places.
HN doesn't recommend it for its content but uses it as a handy example of file size and bitrate for high-resolution video.
5:14COSTA RICA IN 4K 60fps HDR (ULTRA HD)
Jacob + Katie Schwarz
335.2M views • 8 years ago
2:47Visualizing video at the speed of light — one trillion frames per second
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
12M views • 14 years ago
10:35Big Buck Bunny 60fps 4K - Official Blender Foundation Short Film
Blender
23.5M views • 12 years ago
14:27Why is TV 29.97 frames per second?
Stand-up Maths
2.2M views • 10 years ago
13:19Kefrens - Desert Dream - Amiga Demo (HD 50fps)
RetroDemoScene
192K views • 12 years ago
14:23[4k, 60 fps] San Francisco, a Trip down Market Street, April 14, 1906
Denis Shiryaev
4.1M views • 6 years ago
9:51Comparing Beta & VHS on Quality: Was Beta Really Better?
Technology Connections
710K views • 9 years ago
3:36elevated by Rgba & TBC | 4k intro (FullHD 1080p demoscene demo)
Demoscene High-Quality Videos (Annikras)
317K views • 15 years ago
3:48[60 fps] The Flying Train, Germany, 1902
Denis Shiryaev
2.8M views • 6 years ago
4:20Why Snow and Confetti Ruin YouTube Video Quality
Tom Scott
10.4M views • 10 years ago
0:43puls (256 bytes)
JanRrrolaKadlec
36K views • 17 years ago
10:001 million fps Slow Motion video of bullet impacts made by Werner Mehl from Kurzzeit
Matt Rece
15.6M views • 17 years ago
0:40Progressive decoding: JPEG vs JPEG XL vs AVIF
Jon Sneyers
21K views • 5 years ago
8:51How I implemented MegaTextures on real Nintendo 64 hardware
James Lambert
398K views • 3 years ago
15:00I wrote a Raytracer for DOS, 16 VGA colors
Bisqwit
905K views • 15 years ago
8:36[4k, 60 fps] A Trip Through New York City in 1911
Denis Shiryaev
21.7M views • 6 years ago
12:55Apple Pro Display XDR Review (vs Sony Reference Monitor)
HDTVTest
570K views • 6 years ago
3:05Hartverdrahtet - Akronyme Analogiker | 4k Revision 2012
Demoscene High-Quality Videos (Annikras)
340K views • 14 years ago
0:14Chrome vs Firefox vs Safari vs Servo WebRender
Jake Archibald
121K views • 10 years ago
11:02Imaging at a trillion frames per second | Ramesh Raskar
TED
3.2M views • 14 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
Video Streaming has surprising little overlap with Video Codecs . Once you choose input/output options, then there's little to change about the codec. The vast majority of options available to ffmpeg aren't supported in the browser. Streamers don't have options for precisely the same reason OP doesn't have options - you are limited entirely into what the browser supports. I've built the exact pipeline OP has done - Video, over TCP, over Websockets, precisely because I had to deliver video to through a corporate firewall. Wolf, Moonlight and maybe even gstreamer just shows they didn't even try to understand what they were doing, and just threw every buzzword into an LLM. To give you some perspective 40Mbps is an incredible amount of bandwidth. Blu ray is 40mbps. This video, in 8K on Youtube is 20Mbps: ▶ this video There's really no explanation for this.
> YT alone adds 500hrs of video per min . That is at minimum 9000 TB / day (500 18TB disks/day ...) ... assuming SD quality 220 mb per hour single format and one copy. Nitpick: Each bigger resolution stacks on top of the previous one, so 8K60fps means storing 8K60 (webm+av1), alongside 4K60 HDR (webm), 4K60 (webm+av1), 4K (webm), 1440p60 HDR (webm), 1440p60 (webm+av1), 1440p (webm), 1080p60 HDR (webm), 1080p60 (webm+h264+av1), 1080p (webm+h264), 720p60 HDR (webm), 720p60 (webm+h264+av1), 720p (webm+h264), 480p60 HDR (webm), 480p (webm+h264+av1), 360p60 HDR (webm), 360p (webm+h264+av1), 240p60 HDR (webm), 240p (webm+h264+av1), 144p60 HDR (webm), and 144p (webm+h264+av1). And as noted, a given resolution is often stored in multiple video formats, so there's that too. The data needed to store a single video thus adds up quickly: $ youtube-dl -F ▶ this video | grep -o '[0-9\.]\+.iB' | sed 's/MiB/*(1024^2)/;s/GiB/*(1024^3)/;s/.*/(&)/' \ | tr '\n' + | sed 's/\(.*\)+$/scale=3;print(\1)\/(1024^3),"G\n"\n/' | bc -ql 8.423G So for ▶ this video (a random 8K video I found), storing 5 minutes 37 seconds requires about 8.5GB due to all the transcoding. It's quite possible YouTube also keeps the original uploads around for a bit as well. --- It incidentally proved so complicated to correctly type out the format list above manually it was actually easier to figure out the following regex: $ youtube-dl -F ▶ this video | sed -n '/video/{s/^.\{35\}//;s/ \+[0-9]\+k \+, \+/ (/;s/webm.*\|vp9.*/webm/;s/avc.*/h264
No way, 100Mbps is fast today for most people. This 8K youtube video is 5m38s long and 850MiB large: ▶ this video Do the math on that and you need 21Mbps to stream that video without buffering, assuming a uniform bitrate: link 100Mbps down is fast for most people. What do you think the average user is doing that needs more than 100Mbps down?