How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy Explained
Stand-up Maths5 HN recommenders · recommended in 5 months, 2021-2025
8.4M views · 5 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Matt Parker analyzes the Minecraft speedrunning controversy in which Dream was accused of cheating via improbably lucky drops. He walks through the probability and the statistical arguments in the original accusation and the reply.
HN recommends it as an engaging lesson in probability and in how statistics can expose cheating.
24:32How We Solved the Worst Minigame in Zelda's History
Linkus7
1.1M views • 6 years ago
53:58GDC 2010: Sid Meier Keynote - "Everything You Know is Wrong"
GameSpot
101K views • 16 years ago
8:28The Day FPS Games Died
Basically Homeless
2M views • 5 years ago
1:03:28"Devs Play" S1E06 - Psychonauts "The SMK Speedrun" [1/1]
Double Fine
569K views • 11 years ago
23:55The Fall of Minecraft's 2b2t
FitMC
7.3M views • 5 years ago
1:03:07Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010
London Mathematical Society
601K views • 12 years ago
5:58MarI/O - Machine Learning for Video Games
SethBling
11.5M views • 11 years ago
11:39The Unbeatable Game from the 60s: Dr NIM
Stand-up Maths
7.2M views • 10 years ago
13:31Randomness is Random - Numberphile
Numberphile
893K views • 7 years ago
1:17:21Sid Meier's Psychology of Game Design
GDC Festival of Gaming
137K views • 10 years ago
8:24How the Minecraft Title Screen Seed was Found
SalC1
10.8M views • 6 years ago
12:04Why Being Delusional is a Superpower
Veritasium
15.2M views • 6 years ago
14:05TUN: Un-Ruining the MMO
MrBtongue
291K views • 13 years ago
52:22Exposing FRAUD And DECEPTION In The Retro Video Game Market
Karl Jobst
2.8M views • 5 years ago
8:44MMO Economies - Hyperinflation, Reserve Currencies & You! - Extra Credits
Extra Credits
1.5M views • 9 years ago
13:04VACNET Anti-cheat
3kliksphilip
574K views • 8 years ago
11:48John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 2014
O'Reilly
61K views • 12 years ago
7:09This Arcade Game is a SCAM (I have proof)
Mark Rober
51.4M views • 8 years ago
21:14The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule
3Blue1Brown
1.4M views • 5 years ago
27:19Once you understand game theory, you understand the world.
Veritasium
26.5M views • 2 years ago
7 comments from Hacker News
I think the problem is that below 10^-6 there's a pretty broad range of magnitudes that are effectively 'happens to n people every k years (if they try very hard)'. Which makes them rare but not impossible, which is annoying because you can't rule it out but you can't expect to easily reproduce it either. That does tend to be the best way to think about those probabilities. For any probability you can make it happen If you try enough times or with enough people you can try to force it to happen. Below -6 is a pretty wide range of stuff you can just barely make happen if you have enough people, enough tries and enough time. It's only once you get to the 'wouldn't happen to 10^10 people in a million years' that you get to the stuff that you can be fairly sure has never happened. Matt Parker has quite a good video on it [1]. He settles on 10^-19 as something that you can be fairly sure has never happened (deliberately). As for other stuff in the probability rows, maybe include a couple of well known paradoxes like the birthday paradox. And be clear what you're saying, things like getting dealt a royal flush depends a lot on the type of poker game. [1]: ▶ this video
There have been several of these deep dives into manipulated speed runs and they seldom disappoint. Since we are on HN, I'll mention another mathy one that was summarized by Matt Parker: ▶ this video
The key point (in the end) seems to be that the odds for a streak like Niemann had are about 1 in 80k. Statistically speaking, I'd say that's a long shot from a smoking gun. Here's a good rundown of a case where a cheater is considered to have been exposed by statistical evidence, but those odds were on a completely different scale, 10^22: ▶ this video Basically the mistake that is easy to make is that we shouldn't ask: "what is the probability that Hans plays five tournaments like that in a row?", but "what is the probability that someone will play five tournaments like that in a row?". Even if we correct for the fact that there are probably more Minecraft speedruns happening than GM tournaments, odds of 80k just seem a bit too low to call it evidence.
It can still be a fair die. The context implies it's not, but it's only unlikely, not impossible. See ▶ this video It introduces a 10 billion human second century i.e. 3.1 x 10^19. If your chance times it is greater than 1 then it's definitely plausible to be done by someone, somewhere.
Maybe nice to mention that Matt Parker's Stand-up Maths video on the cheating on a MiceCraft speed-run is really very nice [0]. It not only exposes the cheater, it also gives some intuition into negligible probabilities. [0]: ▶ this video
BBC's radio show More or Less did a great piece on this recently. link It is related to Matt Parker's youtube video ▶ this video which has already been mentioned on this post.
The article recommends watching the video by Matt Parker, and so do I. Great refresher on probability (or luck, if you will) For convenience: ▶ this video