Joe Rogan Experience #1191 - Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay
PowerfulJRE2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2018-2019
2.5M views · 8 years ago · podcast · dated
Joe Rogan interviews Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, who describe their hoax papers submitted to academic journals in grievance studies. The conversation runs about two hours and covers academic publishing, ideology and victimhood culture.
HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining account of how easily fake papers get published and of problems in academic peer review.
1:56:08DEF CON 26 - Svea, Suggy, Till - Inside the Fake Science Factory
DEFCONConference
184K views • 8 years ago
2:44:56Joe Rogan Experience #1006 - Jordan Peterson & Bret Weinstein
PowerfulJRE
22.2M views • 9 years ago
19:28Scientific Studies: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
18.1M views • 10 years ago
15:33Joe Rogan on Why he changed his stance on the Moon landing conspiracy
JRE Clips
11.1M views • 9 years ago
3:01:55Joe Rogan Experience #725 - Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson
PowerfulJRE
13.4M views • 10 years ago
35:04The Problem With Sabine Hossenfelder
Professor Dave Explains
1.4M views • 2 years ago
1:55:33Joe Rogan Experience #1109 - Matthew Walker
PowerfulJRE
9.9M views • 8 years ago
2:39:40Joe Rogan Experience #1419 - Daryl Davis
PowerfulJRE
3.9M views • 6 years ago
18:51Forensic Science: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
10.6M views • 9 years ago
22:32Should Knowledge Be Free?
Medlife Crisis
1.1M views • 6 years ago
1:55:08Joe Rogan Experience #1236 - Jack Dorsey
PowerfulJRE
1.8M views • 7 years ago
1:16:17In Search Of A Flat Earth
Folding Ideas
4.9M views • 6 years ago
42:30The man who almost faked his way to a Nobel Prize
BobbyBroccoli
4.2M views • 6 years ago
59:34There is No Algorithm for Truth - with Tom Scott
The Royal Institution
2.7M views • 7 years ago
52:11string theory lied to us and now science communication is hard
Angela Collier
1.5M views • 3 years ago
12:22Is Most Published Research Wrong?
Veritasium
6.2M views • 10 years ago
2:11:57Joe Rogan Experience #1309 - Naval Ravikant
PowerfulJRE
14.8M views • 7 years ago
1:07:46Joe Rogan Experience #965 - Robert Sapolsky
PowerfulJRE
1.7M views • 9 years ago
31:28DEFCON 17: That Awesome Time I Was Sued For Two Billion Dollars
Christiaan008
1.7M views • 15 years ago
8:38Jon Stewart On Vaccine Science And The Wuhan Lab Theory
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert
8.6M views • 5 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
If you have not watched Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay on the Joe Rogan show you should. Very entertaining and shows how ridiculous these publications are. ▶ this video
> Absolutely terrifying. Indeed. We seem to be increasingly awash with evidence that the standards of rigour in academic journals across a number of fields are... quite poor. Peter Boghossian, James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose set out to demonstrate this in the field of grievance studies by submitting and, in some cases, successfully publishing a series of fake papers: ▶ this video I mean, in some sense this is highly entertaining for the rest of us, but it is also utterly horrifying.
The term "competitive victimhood" came to my attention after watching the Joe Rogan interview of Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay who pranked academic journals with research papers based on ridiculous premises. A must watch IMO ▶ this video
> But does that justify what they did? Yes, it does. These journals are an absolute joke, make a mockery of any serious attempt to advance knowledge and understanding, and deserve to be pilloried. Their standards of rigour and review are shockingly poor and as such they do not provide a suitable vehicle for the publication of genuine research, or for measured consideration of the content they do publish. Just this week I ran across this, where a couple of the academics concerned were interviewed by Joe Rogan late last year: ▶ this video Fascinating, horrifying, and entertaining in equal measure. For more background, there's also this on wikipedia: link
It's a 3 page document that makes a number of false assumptions. They extrapolate bitcoin to having 300 billion transactions and means no lightening or L2 solution and the block size would be 3gigs. Nor do they even factor in the halving. Wasn't even researched properly, just utter nonsense for the papers. And Joe Rogan was showing how easy it is to publish fake papers in journals. ▶ this video here is the paper by the way behind a shitty paywall. link