Sensor Fusion on Android Devices: A Revolution in Motion Processing
Google TechTalks2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2012-2026
517K views · 16 years ago · talk · evergreen
David Sachs of InvenSense explains how gyroscopes, accelerometers and compasses work on their own and together, demonstrated on a modified Android handset. He covers sensor fusion algorithms and why rotation math such as Euler angles matters.
HN recommends it as the definitive talk on mobile motion sensing, including why integrating acceleration twice drifts so badly.
2:58Say hello to Project Tango!
Google ATAP
3.7M views • 12 years ago
3:57Welcome to Project Soli
Google ATAP
5.6M views • 11 years ago
5:40New Technology: Haptic Feedback for Touchscreens
GameSpot
80K views • 14 years ago
0:11SmackBook
ealf
1.9M views • 20 years ago
31:35Etak Navigator Tour & Demo
EllsworthC
19K views • 10 years ago
27:55E-paper hacking: fastest possible refresh rate
Applied Science
582K views • 9 years ago
4:42Why Your Webcam Still SUCKS!
Techquickie
552K views • 6 years ago
15:20The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology | Pranav Mistry
TED
5.5M views • 16 years ago
27:20How GPS Works, And How It Got Better Than The Designers Ever Imagined
Scott Manley
943K views • 3 years ago
26:13The Smartphone CPU Review You NEED to Watch!
Geekerwan
345K views • 4 years ago
17:18The Antikythera Mechanism Episode 9 - Making The Epicyclic Pin and Slot Gearing
Clickspring
650K views • 8 years ago
9:58Microsoft Surface Demo @ CES 2008
BotJunkie
2.9M views • 18 years ago
0:10Bookeen breakthrough real time web page scrolling on eInk panel
Bookeen
114K views • 15 years ago
30:36Springboard: the secret history of the first real smartphone (Full Documentary)
The Verge
1.7M views • 4 years ago
2:39TMS Bicycle, stable without gyros or trail (TMS=two-mass-skate)
Arend Schwab
44K views • 15 years ago
37:16Why it's not possible to synchronize turn signals (but also absolutely is)
Technology Connections
3.3M views • 5 years ago
1:47The Counterintuitive Physics of Turning a Bike
minutephysics
855K views • 11 years ago
1:09:46Hands-On with Meta's New VR Headset Prototypes!
Adam Savage’s Tested
417K views • 4 years ago
18:15So... the minute hand shows progression — apparently we think of time in wildly different ways
Technology Connextras
706K views • 4 years ago
27:26E-Ink for productivity: Software and General Updates
Technology Connextras
186K views • 7 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
When this topic comes up, I'm always happy to share this incredible lecture from many many years ago about dead reckoning and how you _cannot_ integrate acceleration twice: ▶ this video (the whole video is incredible, but this is the magical bit)
That is surprising, you must have had an extremely accurate accelerometer and gyro, or employed tricks [1]. There are two problems with determining position from acceleration measurements: 1. You're integrating twice (acceleration to obtain velocity, then velocity to obtain position). So if you have any noise or error, you're integrating that, and integrate that again. Hello, parabola. 2. Gravity. It's strong. So you have to subtract it (as it induces an apparent acceleration upwards). If the difference between actual down and where your model thinks is down is just a fraction of a degree, you'll be totally off within minutes. See eg here: ▶ this video Or here: link > As a concrete example consider a tilt error of just 0.05 [degrees]. This error will cause a component of the acceleration due to gravity with magnitude 0.0086 m/s2 to be projected onto the horizontal axes. This residual bias causes an error in the horizontal position which grows quadratically to 7.7 m after only 30 seconds [and thus to 770 m after 5 minutes, unless I'm mistaken, and 110 km after an hour] Or here: link (search for "Accuracy of Velocity and Position Estimates"). [1] such as assuming that your foot has velocity zero while on the ground, which does not hold when you're in an elevator, for example, and which you can't use in a drone without some serious sensor fusion.
Then you would be surprised how bad they are. A great talk on using mobile sensors is here: ▶ this video Long story short, expect something like 20 cm/s of position drift trying to do dead reckoning off of mobile sensors.
> The big winner will be an easy 3d modeler. Oh, I agree 100%. I was thinking a phone could be ideal here. You'd just wave it through the air, drawing what you want, you could review what you've drawn in the screen and adjust parameters, and it could vibrate to give haptic feedback to help you draw in a straight line, or let you know when your path connects to another that you've drawn. Stuff like that. Unfortunately, it looks like there's too much noise in the accelerometers to make the double integration to position meaningful. Something like Sensor Fusion[1] can make it more accurate by incorporating data from the gyroscope and compass, but even so it's not enough. In any case, like you I hope someone develops something intuitive to really help 3D printing take off. The future should be interesting... [1] ▶ this video