Facebook Freebooting - Smarter Every Day 128
SmarterEveryDay1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2015-2019
905K views · 11 years ago · commentary · dated
Destin Sandlin of Smarter Every Day explains 'Facebook freebooting', where Facebook users re-upload YouTubers' videos natively and the original creators lose views and revenue. He describes his own attempts to get Facebook to act.
HN cites it as the first-hand account of video piracy on Facebook whenever the platform's treatment of creators comes up.
5:02How Facebook is Stealing Billions of Views
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
10M views • 11 years ago
21:05Who is Manipulating Facebook? - Smarter Every Day 215
SmarterEveryDay
1M views • 7 years ago
18:57Manipulating the YouTube Algorithm - (Part 1/3) Smarter Every Day 213
SmarterEveryDay
2.7M views • 7 years ago
15:47VidMe or Why Platforms Aren't Your Friends
Folding Ideas
1M views • 9 years ago
21:24Why are people mean on Twitter? - Smarter Every Day 214
SmarterEveryDay
957K views • 7 years ago
9:00Facebook Fraud
Veritasium
6.6M views • 12 years ago
6:59The Problem With Facebook
2veritasium
3.1M views • 12 years ago
42:29YouTube's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is.
Tom Scott
9M views • 6 years ago
24:47So...TikTok Sucks
Hank Green
1.1M views • 4 years ago
22:32Should Knowledge Be Free?
Medlife Crisis
1.1M views • 6 years ago
23:43My Video Went Viral. Here's Why
Veritasium
5.6M views • 7 years ago
2:05:23Richard Stallman: Copyright vs. Community
RU Computer Science
51K views • 13 years ago
54:58The Surprising History of Copyright and What It Means For...
Google TechTalks
19K views • 19 years ago
14:28$h!tty Thumbnails on Linus Tech Tips - Honest Answers Ep. 5
Linus Tech Tips
1.4M views • 9 years ago
19:06This Is Phil Fish
Innuendo Studios
1.4M views • 12 years ago
22:53I installed Linux (so should you)
PewDiePie
8.5M views • 1 year ago
21:39I Confronted the People That BLOCKED My Video (Rant)
Rick Beato
1.9M views • 6 years ago
8:39:01Decentralized Web Summit - Live From The Internet Archive
Internet Archive
17K views • 10 years ago
8:42Google’s The Selfish Ledger (leaked internal video)
intermission
577K views • 8 years ago
19:25Clickbait is Unreasonably Effective
Veritasium
8.3M views • 5 years ago
10 comments from Hacker News
It's apparently a bit of a hassle to get it removed at times though. And in most cases far to late for it to really matter: ▶ this video
It's absolutely insane that freebooting [1] on Facebook was allowed to persist for so long. It's easy to see the right to monetary remuneration as a method of addressing a massive loophole exploited by Facebook and certain users for years. [1] ▶ this video
SmarterEveryDay told a story in one of his videos about slow-mo clip of tatoo machine in action being ripped from one of his movies by the large press publisher, Bauer, and reuploaded on Bauer's Facebook page. Then Bauer moved on to claim DMCA on his original uploaded by him on his Facebook page: ▶ this video
Facebook has a history of fraud in their other services. Veritasium fell victim to FB's scams as a publisher a couple years ago[1]. I know first-hand that Facebook's advertising model is deeply flawed. When I paid to promote my page I gained 80,000 followers in developing countries who didn't care about Veritasium (but I wasn't aware of this at the time). They drove my reach and engagement numbers down, basically rendering the page useless. They also have a history of encouraging video fraud[2][3]. [1] link [2] ▶ this video [3] link
>“Freebooting” is a silly but oddly appropriate word invented by YouTubers CGP Grey and Brady Haran that means “taking online media and re-hosting it on your website without permission.” link ▶ this video
Consider as well that Facebook steals money from content creators who really need the money . See ▶ this video & link Also, the idea of having Facebook at the cost of giving up your privacy to this behemoth, and more importantly, at the cost of this company exploiting your cognitive biases to get you to buy things hardly seems conducive to a spirit of bettering the world.
I didn't say Udemy was responsible for flagging content. But I am saying there's no fucking way there are only 125 copyright infringing cases. It's a shit ton more. It may not be their responsibility to find them. But to imply that's the extent of the problem is wrong and a lie. "nor can anyone other than the copyright holder reasonably be expected to" I don't think this is a fundamentally true statement. For example I believe that Facebook has a moral obligation to provide tools to stop freebooting. ▶ this video
It's parasitic because of its particular approach. For example, it could embed youtube videos... so that the real creators get their pay, but no, Facebook would rather that the videos be Facebook videos, thereby the original creator getting zero profit from his hard work. See ▶ this video for a first-hand account of the situation.
Did you watch his video where he explains his views himself? I find it pretty convincing: ▶ this video Interestingly, a lot of people are getting very frustrated with Facebook for other reasons as well. Famously, there's Veritasium's video: link I can really appreciate what they're feeling. With piracy as we have traditionally known it, at least usually the pirate is not directly profiting from his act of piracy. With freebooting, Facebook is literally profiting from other people's work. It's directly diverting money flow from the creator (who REALLY NEED THE MONEY) to Facebook. I think it's plainly ridiculous this is happening, and obviously Facebook will turn a blind eye to it because it's making them money. This is one of the reasons why I encourage whitehat security researchers to turn a little gray when it comes to Facebook and do things to bring them down, it'll be for the greater good to bring the behemoth down.
They're both at fault, to varying degrees, explicitly or implicitly. Destin mentions in his "intro to freebooting" video his various attempts to contact Facebook regarding the piracy, and that it was only removed after a Twitter campaign led by his viewers: ▶ this video I don't know much, or have any experience with DMCA, but it's my impression that if there's a copyright violation on Youtube, the video can be taken down very quickly, and the burden of proof is then placed on the uploader to get it back up.