Slavoj Žižek + Paul Holdengräber "Surveillance and whistleblowers" - International Authors' Stage
Det Kgl. Bibliotek3 HN recommenders · recommended in 4 months, 2014-2016
133K views · 12 years ago · interview · dated
Slavoj Zizek and Paul Holdengraber discuss surveillance and whistleblowers at the International Authors' Stage, ranging over Snowden, Assange, Pussy Riot and humor.
HN commenters call it an entertaining, complementary philosophical take on surveillance, with a funny story about jamming secret police.
1:22:4029C3 Panel: Jesselyn Radack, Thomas Drake, William Binney on whistleblowing and surveillance
thisdayinwikileaks
35K views • 13 years ago
1:14:35The Johns Hopkins Foreign Affairs Symposium Presents: The Price of Privacy: Re-Evaluating the NSA
Johns Hopkins University
53K views • 12 years ago
35:18How we take back the internet | Edward Snowden
TED
3.4M views • 12 years ago
26:14Data | Philosophy Tube
Philosophy Tube
876K views • 6 years ago
14:12Glenn Greenwald full interview on Snowden, NSA, GCHQ and spying - Newsnight
BBC Politics
404K views • 13 years ago
1:17:12Violence | Slavoj Žižek | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
791K views • 18 years ago
33:14Government Surveillance: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
38.7M views • 11 years ago
54:35Cybersecurity as Realpolitik by Dan Geer presented at Black Hat USA 2014
Black Hat
65K views • 12 years ago
1:03:14re:publica 2015 - Aral Balkan: Beyond The Camera Panopticon
re:publica
21K views • 11 years ago
0:58Political awakening
Jim Blorg
2K views • 11 years ago
50:00Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism | VPRO Documentary
vpro documentary
4.7M views • 6 years ago
48:52DEFCON 20: Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The National Security Agency and the Constitution
Christiaan008
10K views • 13 years ago
1:03:42re:publica 2012 - Eben Moglen - Freedom of Thought Requires Free Media
re:publica
44K views • 14 years ago
52:51DEF CON 22 - Zoz - Don't Fuck It Up!
DEFCONConference
546K views • 11 years ago
46:06NSA operation ORCHESTRA Annual Status Report - FOSDEM 2014
cnxlinux
7K views • 12 years ago
8:28NSA Whistle-Blower Tells All: The Program | Op-Docs | The New York Times
New York Times Opinion
447K views • 14 years ago
6:01Slavoj Žižek on "They Live" (The Pervert's Guide to Ideology)
Christian G
427K views • 12 years ago
18:01Encryption: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
14.3M views • 10 years ago
8:42Google’s The Selfish Ledger (leaked internal video)
intermission
577K views • 8 years ago
1:28:09Jacob Appelbaum (Part 2/2) Digital Anti-Repression Workshop - April 26 2012
NewYorkRawVideos
19K views • 14 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
Slavoj Zizek had a great talk with a talk show host from the Netherlands precisely about this matter. ▶ this video Fun watch imo. There's also another session between them two.
To follow up on this, here is the full quote from Slavoj Žižek in conversation with Paul Holdengräber: Zizek: Here I’m a little bit of anti-democratic pessimist in the sense that if you really ask people, cut the bullshit, what do you really want from government, I don’t think people really want that government should not torture people and so on, the point is do it but do it discretely I don’t want to know it. 1. ▶ this video
As a complimentary perspective: For those who haven't seen it, I think Slavoj Žižek and Paul Holdengräber on "Surveillance and whistleblowers" is worth a watch. The part about surveillance starts at 21:14 so this link will take you there ▶ this video Žižek: "The most dangerous unfreedom is the unfreedom you don't even experience, as such. If some of you are feminists ... every good feminist will tell you the first step of feminism is just to realise your situation of oppression... We need something similar here. That's the first point. The second point ... I'm a little bit sceptic about this paranoia 'ooh we are totally controlled' and so on and so on, I think we shouldn't take this too seriously. And this doesn't make the situation any easier if anything it makes it more... it [paranoia] is justified, but we should be aware, again we go in to metaphorics again the NSA the Big Eye knows everything, again the mega-machinery is extremely stupid, they don't know what they know. Do you remember, this is a very superficial anecdote ... a guy in LA was Googling the ways to kill your wife something like that, a couple days afterward the FBI brutally entered his house arrested him blah blah blah. Why? Because Google reported this to FBI. But do you know what was the result, this guy was a was one of the you know all the [TV] series CIS / police investigation, we was simply writing a scenario and wanted to check you know, and you have this again and again or form China they told me a wonde
At this stage it has become apparent that opposing surveillance doesn't appear to be helping. It's pretty clear where this is headed, and it seems to me the only way out of it is through it and out the other side, whatever that might look like. My position on surveillance is now, and has been for a few months, what Slavoj Žižek said: "Yeah but I don't care if we are watched. Here I preach arrogance. So what, let the big 'other' watch me maybe he will learn something and be less stupid, you know, this is not my problem." If you haven't seen it this video[1] of Slavoj Žižek and Paul Holdengräber on "Surveillance and whistleblowers" at the International Authors' Stage, published earlier this year, is quite entertaining. The quote above is at 35:54. 1. ▶ this video
Even if you don't like Slavoj Žižek, he has a funny story related to this: ▶ this video He talks about how he and his associates were dissidents and had meetings and they agreed on a protocol to talk gibberish at the end. Fake, military sounding code words and stuff. It was a fun thing to do. Years later they discovered the amount of head-aches and resource drain they caused on the secret police who tried in vain to discover the meaning in this nonsense, thinking that perhaps there was some serious stuff going on. That is why I hope one good thing comes out of it, and that is people might start taking cryptography slightly more seriously and they'll also start actively fighting back. This is one way and it is fun too. (for some strange value of "fun").