GOD MODE UNLOCKED - Hardware Backdoors in x86 CPUs
Black Hat1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2018-2021
319K views · 8 years ago · talk · evergreen
Christopher Domas's Black Hat talk demonstrates a hardware backdoor in a third-party x86 processor, a hidden core that grants root from userland. He uses it to discuss how feasible broader hardware backdoors might be.
Cited in hardware-trust and supply-chain threads as a concrete, startling demonstration of chip-level backdoors.
46:04DEF CON 26 - Christopher Domas - GOD MODE UNLOCKED Hardware Backdoors in redacted x86
DEFCONConference
86K views • 8 years ago
46:34The Memory Sinkhole - Unleashing An X86 Design Flaw Allowing Universal Privilege Escalation
Black Hat
169K views • 10 years ago
44:29Behind the scenes of iOS and Mac Security
Black Hat
36K views • 6 years ago
44:29Breaking the x86 Instruction Set
Black Hat
381K views • 9 years ago
6:36Intel ME explained (intel management engine) from insider
jessie
12K views • 8 years ago
21:28DEF CON 26 - Christopher Domas - The Ring 0 Facade Awakening the Processors Inner Demons
DEFCONConference
24K views • 8 years ago
57:30Black Hat USA 2013 - Spy-Jacking the Booters
Black Hat
5K views • 12 years ago
1:02:52Joanna Rutkowska: Towards (reasonably) trustworthy x86 laptops
media.ccc.de
27K views • 10 years ago
51:32Behind the Scenes of iOS Security
Black Hat
127K views • 10 years ago
33:36Black Hat 2013 - Exploiting Network Surveillance Cameras Like a Hollywood Hacker
HackersOnBoard
1.1M views • 12 years ago
56:3736C3 - Uncover, Understand, Own - Regaining Control Over Your AMD CPU
media.ccc.de
23K views • 6 years ago
53:00The Internet Was Weeks Away From Disaster And No One Knew
Veritasium
16.4M views • 8 months ago
54:35BlueHat IL 2023 - David Weston - Default Security
Microsoft Israel R&D Center
47K views • 3 years ago
38:03Replace Your Exploit-Ridden Firmware with Linux - Ronald Minnich, Google
The Linux Foundation
73K views • 9 years ago
58:05Guarding Against Physical Attacks: The Xbox One Story — Tony Chen, Microsoft
Platform Security Summit
95K views • 7 years ago
44:31BadUSB - On Accessories that Turn Evil by Karsten Nohl + Jakob Lell
Black Hat
147K views • 12 years ago
50:06Protected KVM on Arm64: A Technical Deep Dive - Quentin Perret, Google
The Linux Foundation
6K views • 4 years ago
24:28Ichthyology: Phishing as a Science
Black Hat
38K views • 9 years ago
53:53Hackfest 2015: Theo de Raadt presented "Pledge: A new security technology in openbsd"
Hackfest Communication
27K views • 10 years ago
44:50My personal fight against the modern laptop
linux conf au 2017 - Hobart, Australia
121K views • 9 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
> we need tools that don't require so much blind trust Completely agree. > Open source and verifiable down to the firmware is the only chance we have at any real level of trust The hardware itself could be compromised though. There's just no way to know what's really inside these black boxes. ▶ this video We'll never have real trust until we get the ability to fabricate our own processors in our own home just like we already have the ability to write our own software.
Yeah Occam's razor says your efforts would be much better spent on flashing custom firmware than a retrofit. That or a deliberate backdoor built into the chip from the ground up. Or something like this: ▶ this video But a nearly magic rice-grain part with a microcontroller and networking?? You could make a fortune in IOT with something that capable.
Probably not. However, historically, these sorts of attacks always get better, not worse. And while even that can sometimes be empty rhetoric, I will say in the last 5 years I'm seeing a lot of security attacks that are already well beyond what even my moderately-trained intuition would suggest are possible, so I have to admit I've sort of given up on trying to guess on whether or not an attack can be made practical. I've seen too many mind-blowing presentations from security researchers to think I can bound their abilities safely. I wouldn't care to bet that they won't move the attacks I already am flabbergasted can exist to some other even-more practical attack that I am flabbergasted can exist. This is unrelated to the current matter, but let me give you an example: ▶ this video If you think that's trivially obvious, and you're confident you can predict how these sorts of things will play out in the future, more power to you, but I'm certainly not justified in that belief at my skill level. I'm just happy I can follow that presentation!
This[0] is a backdoor that was discovered _only_ through reading patents on the chip. It gave the highest possible privilege(ring -4) to the user by simply running an undocumented cpu register. It would be incredibly easy to hide something like this within one of the 100 of thousands of computers that go to the big 4 or even the pentagon. I'd imagine people at the pentagon select randomly from a number of computers coming in and do some chip analysis like this[1] but I can only speculate and they probably can't stop all the hardware backdoors this way. Anybody that would be caught disclosing highly classified information would probably be found and promptly hanged(or get in some sort of freak car accident). They probably have some serious counterintelligence to catch the leaks. Once again I am only speculating. [0]: ▶ this video [1]: link
Here is a demonstration by Christopher Domas where he uses an undocumented processor hidden in an X86 processor to become root: ▶ this video