1. A strange determinant
Timothy Gowers3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2022-2026
30K views · 5 years ago · lecture · evergreen
Timothy Gowers thinks aloud, in real time, as he tries to understand why Pascal's determinant equals 1. He does not fully solve it in this episode, but shows his exploratory process.
HN commenters recommend it to see how a top mathematician approaches an unfamiliar problem through experiments and curiosity.
10:03The determinant | Chapter 6, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
5M views • 10 years ago
48:55Pythagoras' theorem (a) | Math History | NJ Wildberger
Insights into Mathematics
517K views • 15 years ago
11:15The hardest problem on the hardest test
3Blue1Brown
16.5M views • 8 years ago
5:09Essence of linear algebra preview
3Blue1Brown
2.8M views • 10 years ago
17:05The essence of calculus
3Blue1Brown
11.9M views • 9 years ago
34:25Ramanujan: Making sense of 1+2+3+... = -1/12 and Co.
Mathologer
3.6M views • 10 years ago
57:03HACKENBUSH: a window to a new world of math
Owen Maitzen
562K views • 5 years ago
24:28Euler's formula with introductory group theory
3Blue1Brown
2.8M views • 9 years ago
32:32The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) Anything
Veritasium
13.1M views • 1 year ago
9:52Vectors | Chapter 1, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
13M views • 10 years ago
1:11:48Math Encounters -- Five Balls, Two Hands: The Patterns of Juggling -- Colin Wright (Presentation)
National Museum of Mathematics
33K views • 14 years ago
34:00Math's Fundamental Flaw
Veritasium
30.8M views • 5 years ago
7:42Extremely Large Numbers 1 - Introduction
Giroux Studios
20K views • 11 years ago
51:16Why can't you multiply vectors?
Freya Holmér
524K views • 3 years ago
44:23A Swift Introduction to Geometric Algebra
sudgylacmoe
1.1M views • 6 years ago
29:43Pi hiding in prime regularities
3Blue1Brown
2.8M views • 9 years ago
7:56Pi and the Mandelbrot Set - Numberphile
Numberphile
881K views • 11 years ago
31:51Visualizing the 4d numbers Quaternions
3Blue1Brown
5.6M views • 8 years ago
22:21Why do prime numbers make these spirals? | Dirichlet’s theorem and pi approximations
3Blue1Brown
7.6M views • 7 years ago
1:07:02Stanford Lecture: Don Knuth—"A Conjecture That Had To Be True" (2017)
Stanford Online
30K views • 8 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
Unfortunately Gowers has taken Tao's lead on this one. Gowers has one of my favourite video series about how he approaches a problem he is unfamiliar with: ▶ this video It is disheartening to see him jump into this GenAI puffery. I hope these GenAI labs are paying Tao handsomely for legitimizing their slop, but more likely he's feeling pressure from his University to promote and work with these labs. My guess is Gowers wants in on that action, or his University does. Either way, it makes me sad. If its self motivated... even sadder.
But I do appreciate the comedy! Well while I have you, the message I feel I failed to adhere to in my comment was my interest in letting you, or others who follow their passion in math and programming, know that what you are doing is in fact “real” math! Keep it up! Your post made me click through a bunch of links in it. Thank you, but give me back that hour! ;P Better yet, I’ll trade you a different rabbit hole. Based on your post I think you’d really enjoy this “strange determinant” series from Timothy Gowers: ▶ this video link
> How would you solve a problem that no one has ever touched before, and that no one knows the answer to? Where are you going to be provided the answer? This is very near and dear to my heart. We are talking about “teaching” and I doubt anyone who supports the current education status quo is advocating to teach using unsolved problems. That said, I do feel, personally, and have long advocated for, teaching using unsolved problems as a better technique, because you learn strategies for approaching a problem much better than: here’s theorem 13.4 heres an exercise problem that uses the theorem, what’s the answer? It reads like you see my opinions are black and white and yours as spectra. Using your own reading on your own comment the logical conclusion is “a system that teaches to an answer will be unable to answer unanswered questions because the students were only taught to answer questions that already have answers.” A great example of the answer being the most useless part of one’s own personal knowledge is Timothy Gowers YouTube content: ▶ this video But who’s cares what some YouTuber is up to? He’s just out here promoting an inherently incorrect education method wrought from a dysfunctional mind.
I’ll add to this to give an example of someone who I feel is doing a great job of satisfying this very request in the field of mathematics: Timothy Gowers. His yt channel is an excellent resource of theoretical understanding through numerical methods. Here’s my favorite series where he confirms/elucidates a “strange” theoretical fact with an explorative numerical style: ▶ this video Simply superb content.