Old car headlights were all the same — which was a fairly bright idea
Technology Connections4 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2022-2023
2.5M views · 4 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Technology Connections explains why American cars all had the same standardized sealed-beam headlights until 1957. It covers the regulations behind the design and the effect on night visibility.
Recommended as a clear explanation of why old headlights looked as they did, and as a case study in mandating requirements versus solutions.
13:43The Senseless Ambiguity of North American Turn Signals
Technology Connections
4.2M views • 8 years ago
17:24The touch lamp; a neat idea, and older than you'd think!
Technology Connections
1.8M views • 6 years ago
18:31The LED Traffic Light and the Danger of "But Sometimes!"
Technology Connections
4.2M views • 8 years ago
18:28The Antique Toaster that's Better than Yours
Technology Connections
3.4M views • 7 years ago
33:33Longer-lasting light bulbs: it was complicated
Technology Connections
2.3M views • 3 years ago
37:16Why it's not possible to synchronize turn signals (but also absolutely is)
Technology Connections
3.3M views • 5 years ago
11:02How to design an actually good toaster with lessons from the 1940's
Technology Connections
851K views • 6 years ago
9:31Around The Corner - How Differential Steering Works (1937)
US Auto Industry
22.3M views • 17 years ago
35:07These Stupid Trucks are Literally Killing Us
Not Just Bikes
7.3M views • 3 years ago
41:44Comparing Tesla, Ford, & VW's Electrical Architectures
Munro Live
381K views • 5 years ago
13:27Is Keeping Your Old Car Better For The Environment?
Engineering Explained
306K views • 5 years ago
14:32Why Gas Engines Are Far From Dead - Biggest EV Problems
Engineering Explained
4.4M views • 6 years ago
21:48Lessons from a Can Opener
Technology Connections
3M views • 4 years ago
13:45Jay Leno's Baker Electric Car
MyClassicCarTV
3M views • 13 years ago
11:18The simple, clever sensor behind automatic windshield wipers
Technology Connections
1.8M views • 2 years ago
9:31How Differential Gear works (BEST Tutorial)
ConceptVBS
9.3M views • 17 years ago
1:02:36Tearing Down the Model T of Our Time - Autoline After Hours 284
Autoline Network
145K views • 11 years ago
6:17Why Cars Rarely Crash into Buildings in the Netherlands
Not Just Bikes
1M views • 6 years ago
22:19The Weird World in RGB
Technology Connections
2.7M views • 7 years ago
57:50A Complete Beginner's Guide to Electric Vehicles
Technology Connections
2.1M views • 4 years ago
6 comments from Hacker News
There's two major safety issues: You can't see around cars to be able to pass. Okay, so you often don't pass. But much more importantly, car headlights aren't symmetrical. The one pointing towards the oncoming lane has a "cut" beam to avoid blinding other drivers while the other has a taller beam to improve visibility of anything entering the road. When you drive LHD in a RHD country, or vice versa, you are blinding other drivers while having low visibility of pedestrians and animals. Technology Connections did a great video about this. His solution was to stop driving his RHD car in low light. ▶ this video
Tech Connections has, as so often the case, a great video about why old car headlights were the shapes they were - and why in later models they often changed: ▶ this video
I think for it to work, you pretty much need federal regulation to step in and standardize. I have this video in mind [1] If we can have EV packs sizes, structural capabilities, voltages, and max currents defined then we can start having swapping services and maybe even better recycling. [1] ▶ this video
Right but in this case the actions taken were wrong, were not fixed, and still are not fixed. Like the fact only in near future it will be legal for US cars to have adaptive lights. Or how for years [1] near every car light was same ineffective design. Over-regulation is as dangerous as under-regulation. If car manufacturers have to squeeze fleet averages (which is on its own retarded idea, just tax every model separately ffs) for normal cars. Or how apparently 20MPG sportscar is "gas guzzler" but 15MPG SUV is not * [1] ▶ this video
There is a YouTube channel called Technology Connections which has a video about American car headlights: ▶ this video which I think illustrated a good example of the difference between mandating a solution, and mandating requirements. Considering car headlights. Obviously there are some requirements we should make - they need to be bright enough to safely light-up the road. They should not blind oncoming drivers. They need to be reasonably safe in the event of a collision. Between the sixties and 1984, the government of the USA mandated a solution. Basically one model of headlights was permitted (with a few minor variations introduced over time). If you look at all car models from this time they have a similar appearance, and the same headlights are still in use in some commercial vehicles today. In most European nations (and other parts of the world) instead a requirement, or series of requirements were made. If you met these standards for lighting level, glare, etc. your headlight was permitted. This led to European and Japanese cars have very varied headlight models, while most American cars were forced to stick to the same old style. This meant that American drivers missed out on innovations in this space. Mandates can very easily become out-dates. Whereas well written requirements are much more timeless.
Also interesting piece about why US was stuck in decades of same light design because of more stupid regulations ▶ this video