Nuclear Propulsion in Space
US National Archives2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2018-2020
192K views · 9 years ago · documentary · dated
A 1968 NASA film from the US National Archives explaining why the US needed a nuclear rocket and how the engine works. It also shows combined nuclear and chemical stages for a manned Mars mission.
HN people link it as an old-timey explainer for nuclear thermal propulsion, and as evidence these engines were already built and tested.
4:19Project Orion Nuclear Propulsion - 1950s Tests | Unclassified Video
VideoFromSpace
132K views • 11 years ago
13:035 REAL Possibilities for Interstellar Travel
PBS Space Time
7.1M views • 11 years ago
13:13The Nuclear Salt Water Rocket - Possibly the Craziest Rocket Engine Ever Imagined.
Scott Manley
970K views • 5 years ago
16:19KSP Doesn't Teach: Rocket Engine Plumbing
Scott Manley
1.1M views • 10 years ago
49:33The Engines That Came In From The Cold - And how The NK-33/RD-180 Came To The USA
Matthew Travis
458K views • 12 years ago
1:51:13A4 / V2 Rocket in detail: Turbopump
Astronomy and Nature TV
1.8M views • 7 years ago
1:00:26Why Starting A Rocket Engine Is So Hard!
Everyday Astronaut
2.3M views • 3 years ago
41:22Elon Musk Explains SpaceX's Raptor Engine!
Everyday Astronaut
2.8M views • 4 years ago
49:02Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines?
Everyday Astronaut
5.4M views • 7 years ago
40:40Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?
Google TechTalks
75K views • 15 years ago
1:53Falcon Heavy & Starman
SpaceX
9.7M views • 8 years ago
11:08Can Spinlaunch Throw Rockets Into Space?
Scott Manley
3.2M views • 4 years ago
1:01:19Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 2 // Summer 2021]
Everyday Astronaut
4.3M views • 5 years ago
15:42Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040
Improbable Matter
2M views • 5 years ago
1:31Space Shuttle Thermal Tile Demonstration
Roscket Tasartir
3.3M views • 15 years ago
19:58The Genius of 3D Printed Rockets
Veritasium
13.2M views • 5 years ago
49:05The Three Rocketeers-2012:BBC-Future of Space trav
FirstSecondThoughts
152K views • 14 years ago
37:21How To Visit STARBASE // A Complete Guide To Seeing Starship!
Everyday Astronaut
470K views • 3 years ago
35:50Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
3:58SpaceX Reusable Launch System
Clark Lindsey
472K views • 15 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
This article didn't explain it at all, so you're right to ask. tl;dr: Gaseous propellant (I'm guessing hydrogen) is heated with fission then pointed in the opposite direction of intended travel. The uranium in this design is not a propellant, but a heat source. Aside: you can use photons/heat as a propellant, but it's thrust is very low link . Ideal propellants typically have a high exit velocity and low mass. That gives you the longest amount of "burn" time, and the greatest amount of control for the weight. link Back in the day when the US was building more of these nuclear rockets, the propellant of choice was typically hydrogen link . Old timey video explaining it ▶ this video . I'm assuming this proposed design would also use hydrogen, but I couldn't find any sources on the propellant for their design. Liquid hydrogen served to keep the reactor cool as it transitioned from liquid to gas as that phase change absorbs energy. The gas is the directed through the reactor core where the gas heats up. As gases heat up, they absorb energy, their average particle velocities increase. Eventually, the hydrogen molecules (mostly H2 or H-H gaseous hydrogen), makes it to the nozzle and is ejected. The high-velocity hydrogen is what actually provides the bulk of the thrust to the spacecraft. Compare this to Project Orion ( link ) which intended to detonate nuclear warheads and the craft essentially rode the shock wave into the stars. I would classify this method of propulsion, not s
I don’t know if any real rockets were built, but according to this old video we’d see a reduction of weight due to the absence of heavy chemical fuel. ▶ this video
It's much more likely to look like NERVA than Orion. link These types of engines have already been run: ▶ this video
aerospikes There’s a lot of reason why they haven’t been used yet, but I think most the compelling argument against them is that they won’t be used until fuel costs become the competitive factor in launch prices. link link Nuclear rockets are quite the concept but have their obvious limitations. This video is worth checking out if you haven’t seen it yet. ▶ this video