StrictlyVC in conversation with Sam Altman, part two (OpenAI)
Connie LoizosCited 4× on HN, 2023-2023
254K views · 3 years ago · interview · news
Part two of a StrictlyVC interview with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, focused on AI. He discusses regulation, commodification of AI, Google's reluctance to release its own models, and best- and worst-case futures.
HN commenters cite it as a primary source for Altman's statements, such as releasing AI more slowly, detection of LLM output being futile, and dismissing the GPT-4 parameter-count rumor.
2:23:57Sam Altman: OpenAI CEO on GPT-4, ChatGPT, and the Future of AI | Lex Fridman Podcast #367
Lex Fridman
6.8M views • 3 years ago
53:26Sam Altman in conversation with StrictlyVC
Connie Loizos
31K views • 7 years ago
1:55:10Sam Altman: OpenAI, GPT-5, Sora, Board Saga, Elon Musk, Ilya, Power & AGI | Lex Fridman Podcast #419
Lex Fridman
2.5M views • 2 years ago
30:10The Inside Story of ChatGPT’s Astonishing Potential | Greg Brockman | TED
TED
1.9M views • 3 years ago
36:02ChatGPT with Rob Miles - Computerphile
Computerphile
517K views • 3 years ago
48:32Sparks of AGI: early experiments with GPT-4
Sebastien Bubeck
1.8M views • 3 years ago
42:30Full interview: "Godfather of artificial intelligence" talks impact and potential of AI
CBS Mornings
2M views • 3 years ago
1:31:13A Hackers' Guide to Language Models
Jeremy Howard
580K views • 3 years ago
2:47:17Yann Lecun: Meta AI, Open Source, Limits of LLMs, AGI & the Future of AI | Lex Fridman Podcast #416
Lex Fridman
1.3M views • 2 years ago
1:04:20Sam Altman & OpenAI | 2023 Hawking Fellow | Cambridge Union
Cambridge Union
179K views • 2 years ago
1:07:31The A.I. Dilemma - March 9, 2023
Center for Humane Technology
3.7M views • 3 years ago
19:20GPT-4chan: This is the worst AI ever
Yannic Kilcher
1M views • 4 years ago
3:31:24Deep Dive into LLMs like ChatGPT
Andrej Karpathy
10.2M views • 1 year ago
47:41Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI Chief Scientist) — Why next-token prediction could surpass human intelligence
Dwarkesh Patel
789K views • 3 years ago
1:22:58OpenAI's GPT-4 Discussion with Red Teamer Nathan Labenz and Erik Torenberg
Cognitive Revolution "How AI Changes Everything"
25K views • 3 years ago
15:49I tried using AI. It scared me.
Tom Scott
8.5M views • 3 years ago
2:15:36Jeff Dean & Noam Shazeer — 25 years at Google: from PageRank to AGI
Dwarkesh Patel
349K views • 1 year ago
1:57:02How We Prevent the AI’s from Killing us with Paul Christiano
Bankless
63K views • 3 years ago
1:03:32John Schulman - Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Progress and Challenges
UC Berkeley EECS
88K views • 3 years ago
47:15Will AI outsmart human intelligence? - with 'Godfather of AI' Geoffrey Hinton
The Royal Institution
878K views • 1 year ago
4 comments from Hacker News
Here is the timeline again: 2022/11/11: A viral tweet claims GPT-4 will have "100 trillion parameters."[1] At this point, there were no rumors about mixture of experts. 2023/01/16: In an interview, Sam Altman mentions he saw the tweet and it was "complete bullshit."[2] 2023/06/20: geohotz and the lead of PyTorch, two people who would be expected to have relevant connections, claim that GPT-4 is an 8 x 220B mixture of experts model.[3] These are two separate, unconnected rumors. One was denied by Sam Altman and was never plausible in the first place. The other was never denied and is highly plausible. You are conflating them by claiming, without any source, that there was "a clear denial from OpenAI's CEO" that "GPT4 is a trillion parameter mixture of experts model." [1] link [2] ▶ this video [3] link
This article repeats the rumor that GPT4 has 100 trillion parameters, which Sam Altman has called "complete bullshit."[1] [1] ▶ this video
I saw this[1] interview with Sam Altman touching on interim AI impact. I really agree with his point that basically detecting output from LLMs is basically going to be futile and only really relevant in the near term. Accuracy is obviously going to improve in models and detection isnt that difficult now but will be in the future, especially if output is modified or an attempt to obfuscate origin is made. [1] ▶ this video
> they shouldn't all be walled off inside of companies Strong agree. This is becoming a bigger concern than people realize too. Sam A said OpenAI will be releasing "much more slowly than people would like" and would "sit on" their tech for a long time going forward.[0] And Deepmind's founder said that "the AI industry's culture of publishing its findings openly may soon need to end."[1] This sounds like Google and MSFT won't even be shipping their best AI to people via API's. They'll just keep that tech in-house to power their own services. That underscores the need for open, distributed models. And like you say, there's room for both. [0] ▶ this video [1] link