HackerTube
HomeLongsLikedHistoryWatch laterCategoriesPlaylistsSettings

Dance p 3 Mar09

Geoff Cumming2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2011-2015
YouTube
83K views · 17 years ago · explainer · evergreen

Geoff Cumming uses a simulation to show how wildly the p value varies from one replication to the next because of sampling variability. He argues for estimation and confidence intervals over null hypothesis significance testing.

Recommended as a vivid visual demonstration of how unreliable p-values are.

Data science & statisticsScientific method & science communication#p-values#nhst#statistics#estimation#replication

3 comments from Hacker News

@po2015 · in “Psychology Journal Bans Significance Testing”

The audio is a bit quiet but the 'dance of the p values' video [1] linked to by the article is absolutely fantastic and well worth watching. [1] ▶ this video

Strongly recommendsView on HN
@lomnakkus2014 · in “Gravity waves from Big Bang detected”

I can't claim to understand much of the statistics, but according to [1], p-values are pretty sketchy as a measure of "is this likely to be true?" [1] ▶ this video

CitesView on HN
@knowledgesale2011 · in “Ask HN: What interesting non-intuitive things do you know?”

The p-value [1] criterion is often used to test a proposed hypothesis in medical and social science research papers. When you stumble upon something along the lines of "studies that shown that eating broccoli makes people happy" in your everyday life, it comes down to the p-value calculation being small enough <0.05 for the before and after gathered datasets. The p-value method is practically a standard for scientific reporting in some fields. It also has some drastic shortcomings, including, e,g., dramatic instability for tests with only little data [2]. Naturally, people realize that and try to use additional tools and criteria when available. However, scientists are pretty brutally incentivized to publish positive results and, as a result, more often than it should be, too much weight is put on the single p-value criterion. With issues like this in mind, in my opinion, it makes sense to be somewhat skeptical when seeing reports in the news that "A effects B" and definitely not to rush with the conclusions. Trivial, I know. The [3] video pretty much sums it up and by all means is worth a watch. ------------------- [1] link [2] link [3] ▶ this video

Strongly recommendsView on HN
John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 201411:48

John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 2014

O'Reilly
61K views • 12 years ago
Is Most Published Research Wrong?12:22

Is Most Published Research Wrong?

Veritasium
6.2M views • 10 years ago
Jake Vanderplas - Statistics for Hackers - PyCon 2016.mp440:45

Jake Vanderplas - Statistics for Hackers - PyCon 2016.mp4

PyCon 2016
93K views • 10 years ago
Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 20101:03:07

Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010

London Mathematical Society
601K views • 12 years ago
The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) Anything32:32

The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) Anything

Veritasium
13.1M views • 1 year ago
Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data1:02:57

Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data

UBC Computer Science
74K views • 15 years ago
The Bayesian Trap10:37

The Bayesian Trap

Veritasium
4.5M views • 9 years ago
The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule21:14

The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule

3Blue1Brown
1.4M views • 5 years ago
Efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo -- Michael Betancourt (Part 1)1:29:43

Efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo -- Michael Betancourt (Part 1)

MLSS Iceland 2014
48K views • 11 years ago
Matt Might - Winning the War on Error Solving the Halting Problem and Curing Cancer48:36

Matt Might - Winning the War on Error Solving the Halting Problem and Curing Cancer

Curry On!
9K views • 9 years ago
You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong45:13

You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong

Veritasium
11.6M views • 11 months ago
What Happens When Maths Goes Wrong? - with Matt Parker1:07:34

What Happens When Maths Goes Wrong? - with Matt Parker

The Royal Institution
3.3M views • 7 years ago
Emacs + org-mode + python in reproducible research; SciPy 2013 Presentation21:16

Emacs + org-mode + python in reproducible research; SciPy 2013 Presentation

Enthought
50K views • 13 years ago
What P vs NP is actually about17:58

What P vs NP is actually about

Polylog
253K views • 2 years ago
P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoo10:44

P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoo

hackerdashery
3.7M views • 12 years ago
Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread | Sandy Pentland | Talks at Google54:47

Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread | Sandy Pentland | Talks at Google

Talks at Google
53K views • 12 years ago
Cambridge Ideas - Professor Risk6:01

Cambridge Ideas - Professor Risk

Cambridge University
128K views • 16 years ago
How We’re Fooled By Statistics7:38

How We’re Fooled By Statistics

Veritasium
3.8M views • 12 years ago
Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?18:16

Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?

Stand-up Maths
906K views • 5 years ago
Why Being Delusional is a Superpower12:04

Why Being Delusional is a Superpower

Veritasium
15.2M views • 6 years ago