Dance p 3 Mar09
Geoff Cumming2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2011-2015
83K views · 17 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Geoff Cumming uses a simulation to show how wildly the p value varies from one replication to the next because of sampling variability. He argues for estimation and confidence intervals over null hypothesis significance testing.
Recommended as a vivid visual demonstration of how unreliable p-values are.
11:48John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 2014
O'Reilly
61K views • 12 years ago
12:22Is Most Published Research Wrong?
Veritasium
6.2M views • 10 years ago
40:45Jake Vanderplas - Statistics for Hackers - PyCon 2016.mp4
PyCon 2016
93K views • 10 years ago
1:03:07Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010
London Mathematical Society
601K views • 12 years ago
32:32The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) Anything
Veritasium
13.1M views • 1 year ago
1:02:57Peter Norvig - The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data
UBC Computer Science
74K views • 15 years ago
10:37The Bayesian Trap
Veritasium
4.5M views • 9 years ago
21:14The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule
3Blue1Brown
1.4M views • 5 years ago
1:29:43Efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo -- Michael Betancourt (Part 1)
MLSS Iceland 2014
48K views • 11 years ago
48:36Matt Might - Winning the War on Error Solving the Halting Problem and Curing Cancer
Curry On!
9K views • 9 years ago
45:13You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong
Veritasium
11.6M views • 11 months ago
1:07:34What Happens When Maths Goes Wrong? - with Matt Parker
The Royal Institution
3.3M views • 7 years ago
21:16Emacs + org-mode + python in reproducible research; SciPy 2013 Presentation
Enthought
50K views • 13 years ago
17:58What P vs NP is actually about
Polylog
253K views • 2 years ago
10:44P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoo
hackerdashery
3.7M views • 12 years ago
54:47Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread | Sandy Pentland | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
53K views • 12 years ago
6:01Cambridge Ideas - Professor Risk
Cambridge University
128K views • 16 years ago
7:38How We’re Fooled By Statistics
Veritasium
3.8M views • 12 years ago
18:16Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?
Stand-up Maths
906K views • 5 years ago
12:04Why Being Delusional is a Superpower
Veritasium
15.2M views • 6 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
The audio is a bit quiet but the 'dance of the p values' video [1] linked to by the article is absolutely fantastic and well worth watching. [1] ▶ this video
I can't claim to understand much of the statistics, but according to [1], p-values are pretty sketchy as a measure of "is this likely to be true?" [1] ▶ this video
The p-value [1] criterion is often used to test a proposed hypothesis in medical and social science research papers. When you stumble upon something along the lines of "studies that shown that eating broccoli makes people happy" in your everyday life, it comes down to the p-value calculation being small enough <0.05 for the before and after gathered datasets. The p-value method is practically a standard for scientific reporting in some fields. It also has some drastic shortcomings, including, e,g., dramatic instability for tests with only little data [2]. Naturally, people realize that and try to use additional tools and criteria when available. However, scientists are pretty brutally incentivized to publish positive results and, as a result, more often than it should be, too much weight is put on the single p-value criterion. With issues like this in mind, in my opinion, it makes sense to be somewhat skeptical when seeing reports in the news that "A effects B" and definitely not to rush with the conclusions. Trivial, I know. The [3] video pretty much sums it up and by all means is worth a watch. ------------------- [1] link [2] link [3] ▶ this video