Factor: an extensible interactive language
Google TechTalks5 HN recommenders · recommended in 5 months, 2014-2025
59K views · 18 years ago · talk · evergreen
A 2008 Google Tech Talk in which Slava Pestov introduces Factor, a concatenative language influenced by Forth, Lisp and Smalltalk. It covers the interactive environment, metaprogramming, and the language's modern high-level features and libraries.
HN recommends it as the best introduction to Factor and concatenative programming, with commenters saying it impressed them with the engineering.
1:12:10Practical Common Lisp
Google TechTalks
98K views • 19 years ago
1:07:22Invited Talk - Guy Steele
ClojureTV
39K views • 9 years ago
1:06:26Over the Shoulder 1 - Text Preprocessing in Forth
Andreas Wagner
25K views • 12 years ago
1:04:45Stanford Seminar - Concatenative Programming: From Ivory to Metal
Stanford Online
14K views • 8 years ago
1:28:59Clojure for Lisp Programmers Part 1 - Rich Hickey
ClojureTV
25K views • 13 years ago
1:14:52Effective Programs - 10 Years of Clojure - Rich Hickey
ClojureTV
176K views • 9 years ago
12:56Stephen Wolfram's Introduction to the Wolfram Language
Wolfram
924K views • 12 years ago
38:26"Code is the Easy Part" by Evan Czaplicki
elm-conf
43K views • 10 years ago
53:56Expert to Expert: Rich Hickey and Brian Beckman - Inside Clojure
jasonofthel33t
119K views • 13 years ago
46:36Type-Driven Development in Idris — Edwin Brady
Scala World
26K views • 11 years ago
59:03Breaking Down Programming Paradigms: APL's Surprising Learning Curve // Aaron Hsu // Dyalog '17
Dyalog User Meetings
7K views • 9 years ago
1:03:31Brian Goetz - Stewardship: the Sobering Parts
ClojureTV
39K views • 11 years ago
1:07:28CUFP 2011 Keynote: Pragmatic Haskell (Lennart Augustsson Standard Chartered Bank)
anilmvs
7K views • 14 years ago
33:32Condition Systems in an Exceptional Language - Chris Houser
ClojureTV
16K views • 10 years ago
46:09Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman
Metosin
1.6M views • 7 years ago
1:24:38Lecture 7A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986
MIT OpenCourseWare
35K views • 17 years ago
1:05:51The Functional Programmer's Toolkit - Scott Wlaschin
NDC Conferences
79K views • 7 years ago
1:12:56Lecture 1A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986
MIT OpenCourseWare
995K views • 17 years ago
1:04:35The Algebra of Algebraic Data Types
London Haskell
27K views • 13 years ago
43:37Lambda World 2018 - What FP can learn from Smalltalk by Aditya Siram
Lambda World
25K views • 7 years ago
8 comments from Hacker News
It's funny because 3 dropped in 2008, the same year Slava was demonstrating Factor in google tech talks which was a contemporary language to python3 that completely blew Python out of the water. ▶ this video
Your comment does not make much sense even if it is true. Factor (Forth-like language) implements even its own ":" (defines a word, i.e. a function) using the language itself, it is not builtin, same with "if", and so forth. Thus, "MEMO:" or locals[1] ("::") being implemented as a library does not mean it is a bad thing, on the contrary, in the case of Factor, it makes it quite powerful. The object system is entirely implemented in Factor, too. "Large chunks of functionality are not part of the core language, they are in just as library".[2] And to compare OCaml's type system to Python's is straight out absurd. [1] Locals are entirely implemented in Factor, too, which is only about ~500 lines of code. It is not part of the core language, and on top of that, there is no performance penalty whatsoever! [2] See more here: ▶ this video .
I agree. I remember his talk on Factor. I wish people gave enough support back then so he could work on it full-time. Here is his talk on Factor: ▶ this video , back from 2008.
There was always something I liked about Forth when I didn't have to do much stack-thinking. One of the things that felt forth-y to me when I first encountered it was threaded code in Clojure (or any other point-free kind of idiom for that matter). link I'll sometimes abuse Python's compose to do similar things I won't send out for code review. Maybe I really should just try to live in Coconut instead of silly stuff like: import chess import chess.svg from IPython.display import SVG, display from functools import reduce def rcompose(*fs): return reduce(lambda f, g: lambda *xs, **ys: g(f(*xs, **ys)), fs) inline_board = rcompose( chess.Board, chess.svg.board, SVG, display) Factor's quotations dealing with stack management weirdness is super nice, too. link It still has a bit more stack juggling than I like, though. That could just be a "me" problem. Props to that whole community for their effort. ▶ this video
As someone who built Forth compilers back in the day, I really like this language. There's a nice overview of Factor as a paper here: link and a Google tech talk video of Slava Pestov (Factor's creator) showing off the language here: ▶ this video
I just stumbled across this Google Tech Talk on [factor][0] last night! It absolutely blew my mind. The engineering looks to be top notch, and the video is 9 years old to boot! ▶ this video Anyway, really want to give Factor a try for some personal projects. Would love to hear anecdotes from people who futz with this stuff. [0]: link
I recently came across a language called Factor that works very similar, if not identical, to this. Here's a video about it: ▶ this video
I see what you did there. ps: just in case here's a very enjoyable talk, not about, but by Slava ▶ this video Beautiful and impressive.