Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters - Jimmy Bogard
NDC Conferences2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2018-2023
439K views · 9 years ago · talk · evergreen
Jimmy Bogard presents a post-mortem of a real microservices migration that turned into a slow distributed monolith. He covers the modeling, development and production problems and how the team recovered.
Recommended as an entertaining cautionary talk on microservice failures and Conway's law.
53:14Mastering Chaos - A Netflix Guide to Microservices
InfoQ
2.3M views • 9 years ago
46:39What I Wish I Had Known Before Scaling Uber to 1000 Services • Matt Ranney • GOTO 2016
GOTO Conferences
334K views • 10 years ago
42:20"Stop Rate Limiting! Capacity Management Done Right" by Jon Moore
Strange Loop Conference
41K views • 9 years ago
28:21Velocity 2012: Richard Cook, "How Complex Systems Fail"
O'Reilly
60K views • 14 years ago
53:25The Only Unbreakable Law
Molly Rocket
487K views • 4 years ago
1:10:23"Systems that run forever self-heal and scale" by Joe Armstrong (2013)
Strange Loop Conference
85K views • 5 years ago
48:30Design Microservice Architectures the Right Way
InfoQ
741K views • 8 years ago
56:19MINIX 3: a Modular, Self-Healing POSIX-compatible Operating System
FOSDEM
90K views • 16 years ago
55:44AWS re:Invent 2018: How AWS Minimizes the Blast Radius of Failures (ARC338)
Amazon Web Services
37K views • 7 years ago
3:55Velocity 2011: Artur Bergman, "Artur on SSD's"
O'Reilly
30K views • 15 years ago
48:04Greg Young — A Decade of DDD, CQRS, Event Sourcing
Domain-Driven Design Europe
190K views • 10 years ago
3:09Microservices
KRAZAM
4M views • 6 years ago
41:08"Transactions: myths, surprises and opportunities" by Martin Kleppmann
Strange Loop Conference
84K views • 11 years ago
52:29"I See What You Mean" by Peter Alvaro
Strange Loop Conference
59K views • 11 years ago
1:19:35Lecture 1: Introduction
MIT 6.824: Distributed Systems
921K views • 6 years ago
1:19:06Netdev 0x16 - Keynote: It's Time to Replace TCP in the Datacenter
netdevconf
5K views • 3 years ago
19:10Velocity NY 2013: Richard Cook, "Resilience In Complex Adaptive Systems"
O'Reilly
47K views • 13 years ago
1:03:48Greg Young - CQRS and Event Sourcing - Code on the Beach 2014
Code on the Beach
170K views • 12 years ago
30:06"Tackling Concurrency Bugs with TLA+" by Hillel Wayne
Strange Loop Conference
24K views • 9 years ago
1:22:45Building Software Systems At Google and Lessons Learned
Stanford
257K views • 15 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
It is such a weird feeling to come across a topic I haven't read on in a while, watch two videos on it out of random curiosity, hop on hackernews the next day, and get a recommendation for the exact same videos. I very much enjoyed the 5 techniques and many of the tidbits. I also liked "Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters" but mostly for the entertainment value ( ▶ this video )
As your average developer who's heard architects mention these micro-frontends, I would have liked the article to start off by listing the use cases and trade-offs instead of jumping right on the hype train at full speed. Since the article mentions Piral, I thought I would peruse that project's documentation (0), but am none the wiser on basic questions like: how do components get assembled into the main application, is network traffic overhead is going to be a problem, etc. Delving further into the Piral docs, I came across a link to a sample micro-frontend (1) that seems to be importing every micro-frontend into the index, so network traffic overhead seems like it could be an issue. Does anyone here have experience with these in a production environment and know how to avoid (in my mind) basic pitfalls like these? As it stands, this article seems to be setting people up for scenarios like the Bell micro-services disaster (2) [0] link [1] link [2] ▶ this video
▶ this video (39:00) Conway's law: Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure. Jimmy's law: A broken, dysfunctional organization driven by meeting unhealthy goals and metrics will produce broken, dysfunctional systems. Inverse Conway Maneuver: Design the organization you want, the architecture will follow, kicking and screaming.