Coronavirus Update 98: Rapid COVID 19 Antigen Testing at Home - A Possible Breakthrough
MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020-2021
205K views · 6 years ago · lecture · news
MedCram's Dr. Roger Seheult summarizes a discussion with Dr. Michael Mina on cheap, paper-based at-home COVID-19 antigen tests. It explains why lower sensitivity can still work well for screening infectious people.
Pointed to in 2020 testing threads for a visual explanation of why rapid antigen tests still serve a purpose.
36:47TWiV 641: COVID-19 with Dr. Anthony Fauci
MicrobeTV
129K views • 6 years ago
43:41COVID-19 Vaccines: MODERNA | PFIZER/BIONTECH | ASTRAZENECA
Ninja Nerd
6.8M views • 5 years ago
3:08Why Weren't We Wearing Masks From the Beginning? Dr. Anthony Fauci Explains
TheStreet
78K views • 6 years ago
30:26Vitamin D and Immunity, Lots of Evidence
Dr. John Campbell
711K views • 6 years ago
11:05How Coronavirus Kills: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) & COVID 19 Treatment
MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY
4.7M views • 6 years ago
20:21Vitamin D and immunity
Dr. John Campbell
1.6M views • 6 years ago
19:33Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee
AAPS Video
5.3M views • 5 years ago
38:26COVID-19: A Second Opinion
SenatorRonJohnson
2.7M views • 4 years ago
1:28March 2020: Dr. Anthony Fauci talks with Dr Jon LaPook about Covid-19
60 Minutes
1.6M views • 6 years ago
1:34:11Joe Rogan Experience #1439 - Michael Osterholm
PowerfulJRE
15.9M views • 6 years ago
36:56You Need To Listen To This Leading COVID-19 Expert From South Korea | STAY CURIOUS #15
Asian Boss
6.6M views • 6 years ago
26:08Did SARS-Cov-2 start in a Chinese lab?
potholer54
182K views • 6 years ago
21:03Inadvertant intravenous injections
Dr. John Campbell
507K views • 5 years ago
10:03I Found The Source of the Coronavirus
laowhy86
2.4M views • 6 years ago
20:58The Epidemic of Fake Disease
Medlife Crisis
2.4M views • 6 years ago
4:38An Update On Dianna's Health
Physics Girl
5.9M views • 3 years ago
2:52If money was no object, should you run every medical test?
Medlife Crisis
263K views • 8 years ago
1:56:10Sunlight: Optimize Health and Immunity (Light Therapy and Melatonin)
MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY
4.2M views • 4 years ago
8:57Exponential growth and epidemics
3Blue1Brown
6.1M views • 6 years ago
2:01:45Bret Weinstein and Yuri Deigin: Did Covid-19 leak From a Lab?
Bret Weinstein
179K views • 6 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
> But if the rapid tests are as unreliable in general as they were for me, it’s sort of no wonder COVID is spreading like wildfire. Many rapid tests are indeed not accurate[1] but they still serve a purpose, depending on the sensitivity and specificity of the tests[2]. For the rapid tests with high sensitivity and you get a positive result, it's highly likely you have COVID. For the rapid tests with high specificity and you get a negative result, it's highly likely that you don't have COVID. And the public health measures of testing / contact tracing ONLY works if testing results come back quick. PCR tests are neither fast nor cheap, so those are not as effective in prevention of spreading because you don't do those all the time (slow + expensive). Medcram has a good video talking about this. [3] [1]: link [2]: link [3]: ▶ this video
Right - see the MedCram lectures on the topic: How to Beat COVID-19 with At-Home, Rapid Result Testing: 5 Min. Summary by Dr. Mina (Antigen Tests) link Coronavirus Pandemic Update 98: At Home COVID-19 Testing - A Possible Breakthrough (~ 15 min) ▶ this video At Home, Cheap, COVID-19 Tests with Results in 15 Minutes: How to Fix Testing with Dr. Michael Mina (~ 1 hr) link
The visual explanation of the ideas and concepts presented there, also mentioned in the later podcast: Medcram: “Coronavirus Pandemic Update 98: At Home COVID-19 Testing - A Possible Breakthrough” ▶ this video Also, regarding the Ct value, from: “Interpreting the COVID-19 Test Results: a Guide for Physiatrists” link In PCR tests “the diagnosis is made based on the threshold cycle (Ct) value. Ct is defined as the cycle number when the sample fluorescence exceeds a chosen threshold above the calculated background fluorescence.5 In other words, the lower the Ct value of a specific gene, the more the gene exists in the sample. However, the problem with a Ct-based diagnosis is that there is no absolute or constant Ct cut-off value, and Ct cut-off values are different for each diagnostic reagent even for the same gene.”