Nord Stream sabotage and hybrid war on Europe
Anders Puck Nielsen2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2022-2023
168K views · 4 years ago · commentary · news
Anders Puck Nielsen analyzes the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage using Kilcullen's theory of liminal warfare and prospect theory. He argues from the operational design that Russia is the most likely culprit, then discusses how hybrid warfare might be used against Europe.
HN points to it as a compact, reasoned case for Russian responsibility, though at least one commenter found the argument unconvincing.
0:33Biden says he'll shut down Nord Stream 2 pipeline if Russia further invades Ukraine
Yahoo Finance
2.2M views • 4 years ago
13:56Understanding the Russian mindset
CaspianReport
994K views • 12 years ago
31:56Why Russia is Invading Ukraine
RealLifeLore
21.7M views • 4 years ago
1:12:30George Friedman, "Europe: Destined for Conflict?"
Chicago Council on Global Affairs
887K views • 11 years ago
3:43President Biden on Nord Stream 2 Pipeline if Russia Invades Ukraine: "We will bring an end to it."
C-SPAN
570K views • 4 years ago
3:14Trump blasts Germany over gas pipeline deal with Russia
CBS Evening News
584K views • 8 years ago
57:21How Corruption Destroys Armies - Theft, Graft, and Russian failure in Ukraine
Perun
2.7M views • 4 years ago
1:14:16Why is Ukraine the West's Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer
The University of Chicago
30.4M views • 11 years ago
1:05:27How lies destroy armies - Lies, coverups, and Russian failures in Ukraine
Perun
1.6M views • 3 years ago
47:01Operation InfeKtion: How Russia Perfected the Art of War | NYT Opinion
New York Times Opinion
1.8M views • 7 years ago
1:00:22Tiedustelueverstin arvio Venäjästä | 3.12.2018
fin_topsu
2M views • 4 years ago
1:35Trump: Germany 'Totally Controlled By Russia'
Associated Press
102K views • 8 years ago
2:24:33Sarah C. M. Paine — Why dictators keep making the same fatal mistake
Dwarkesh Patel
5.4M views • 3 years ago
6:49Neo-Nazi threat in new Ukraine: NEWSNIGHT
BBC Politics
2.7M views • 12 years ago
3:35The Russian Grab | Peter Zeihan
Speakers Spotlight
269K views • 9 years ago
3:26:42John Mearsheimer: Israel-Palestine, Russia-Ukraine, China, NATO, and WW3 | Lex Fridman Podcast #401
Lex Fridman
8.3M views • 2 years ago
47:12Putin's new Russian MHD weapons explained (1st part)
Jean-Pierre PETIT
34K views • 8 years ago
21:24The CIA is a Terrorist Organization
Second Thought
794K views • 5 years ago
44:07Pandora's Box, E1: The Engineers' Plot
nagualdesign
325K views • 14 years ago
46:06NSA operation ORCHESTRA: Annual Status Report
HUP
30K views • 12 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
Anders Puck Nielsen has an under 15 minute video with a compelling explanation for why Russia is most likely to have done it despite the obvious downsides. Just to pick some particular details: At this particular time the primary Russian strategy was to push Europe into a cold and dark winter. Pipelines can be rebuilt and that is not especially difficult when you are making big money from extracting and distributing fossil fuels. Even if you disagree with Anders' conclusions I think the points he raises are generally quite interesting: ▶ this video
He said at the start of that video he discussed his belief about the probability of Russia attacking was covered in this video ▶ this video > They want people to be panicked by their hybrid warfare Why? People were already panicking about Russia (rolling through Western Europe, using nukes, etc). The argument in the video I linked is not very convincing to me at all. Nobody was ever under any doubt that Russia could bomb some unguarded infrastructure near its border. And he just handwaves the idea that the US could have carried an operation to sabotage the pipeline as a "clandestine activity" (i.e., making it look like an accident) just by hacking it or something. It's a Hollywood analysis of "hackers". Why even fight Russia at all, why not just hack all their military, factories, refineries, communications, and power plants? It might be a fun exercise in simplistic game theory type analysis but taking that and using it to assign Russia as the most likely culprit seems like astounding hubris and naivety.
> what is the most articulate and sensible piece on why the most likely culprit is Russia? I think this video is articulate and sensible: ▶ this video
The Anders Puck Nelson video about this came to the conclusion that it was probably Russia. His reasoning is interesting. ▶ this video
That cause for that event is not undisputed, see link . You still haven't explained why you think it's doubtful Russia would use sabotage in this way. This is what their entire modus operandi, just think of the various Polonium-210 and Novichok operations. You can't dispute that people are suspecting USA of having done it, does that not harm cohesion inside NATO? ▶ this video