Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile
Numberphile2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020-2025
767K views · 9 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Matt Parker on Numberphile explains the strange properties of spheres in higher dimensions, such as how they poke out of their bounding boxes. It uses Pythagoras to build intuition for 4D and beyond.
Recommended whenever the counterintuitive geometry of high-dimensional spheres comes up, including in vector embedding discussions.
32:11Darts in Higher Dimensions (with 3blue1brown) - Numberphile
Numberphile
2.1M views • 6 years ago
25:13Thinking outside the 10-dimensional box
3Blue1Brown
3.2M views • 9 years ago
1:01:40Four Dimensional Maths: Things to See and Hear in the Fourth Dimension - with Matt Parker
The Royal Institution
3.1M views • 11 years ago
7:27Sloane's Gap - Numberphile
Numberphile
1.5M views • 13 years ago
8:29The Uncracked Problem with 33 - Numberphile
Numberphile
2M views • 11 years ago
50:27Hamming, "n-Dimensional Space" (April 14, 1995)
securitylectures
14K views • 14 years ago
8:00Infinity is bigger than you think - Numberphile
Numberphile
7.7M views • 14 years ago
14:27All the Numbers - Numberphile
Numberphile
1.8M views • 7 years ago
12:25Fantastic Quaternions - Numberphile
Numberphile
1.1M views • 10 years ago
8:25Klein Bottles - Numberphile
Numberphile
2.8M views • 11 years ago
9:16Graham's Number - Numberphile
Numberphile
3M views • 14 years ago
7:56Pi and the Mandelbrot Set - Numberphile
Numberphile
881K views • 11 years ago
4:01Spherical Geometry Is Stranger Than Hyperbolic - Hyperbolica Devlog #2
CodeParade
1.8M views • 6 years ago
13:385040 and other Anti-Prime Numbers - Numberphile
Numberphile
2.4M views • 10 years ago
3:49The Trinity Hall Prime - Numberphile
Numberphile
322K views • 9 years ago
41:44Numberphile v. Math: the truth about 1+2+3+...=-1/12
Mathologer
3.3M views • 8 years ago
7:50ASTOUNDING: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... = -1/12
Numberphile
9.8M views • 12 years ago
9:12Base 12 - Numberphile
Numberphile
2.3M views • 13 years ago
21:25Outside In
ssgelm
11.7M views • 15 years ago
31:51Visualizing the 4d numbers Quaternions
3Blue1Brown
5.6M views • 8 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
There is a good numberphile video about that ▶ this video It contains also a hilarious reference to the "parker circle:.
Also not a topologist, but thought it was interesting after watching the video from the current top comment, ▶ this video , where if you look at the size of the "contained sphere", 4D is the only place where the contained sphere is exactly tangent to the containing box. Lower than that, and it's easy to visualize how the contained sphere is smaller, higher than that, the contained sphere is always bigger. So seems like it might be a natural consequence that techniques that work at higher or lower dimensions don't work for the case in 4D where the sphere is exactly tangent.
Oh they are very spike-y, well, my point in the above post is to just solve the eq but easier 'visualization' would be [0] By the way, this is a similar phenomena to the 'curse of dimensionality' [1] [0] ▶ this video [1] link
Generalizations to higher dimensions[1] also have some fun properties. For one, the volume of a n-dimensional sphere (ball) goes to zero as n goes to infinity. But not in a trivial way: given a radius r, you can find the number of dimensions n that maximizes the volume of the n-sphere. For r=1 it's 5 dimensions, but for r=3 it's 55 dimensions. Numberphile[2] has a video on higher dimensional spheres which talks about this weirdness. [1]: link [2]: ▶ this video