Feynman :: Rules of Chess
defjam99b1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2011-2023
1.4M views · 19 years ago · lecture · evergreen
A three-minute clip of Richard Feynman using the rules of chess as an analogy for how science works, discovering rules by observation and sometimes meeting surprises like castling. It touches on incremental progress versus revolutions.
Cited in discussions of the scientific method and empiricism as Feynman's classic analogy of watching a game to infer its rules.
1:03The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman
Sképseis
180K views • 13 years ago
9:59Feynman on Scientific Method.
seabala
2.4M views • 15 years ago
1:52R. P. Feynman on social sciences
x1x2x3ct
210K views • 16 years ago
5:37Feynman: Knowing versus Understanding
TehPhysicalist
2.7M views • 14 years ago
1:53Richard Feynman on Pseudoscience
Jacob Edward
363K views • 10 years ago
9:47Feynman: Mathematicians versus Physicists
TehPhysicalist
882K views • 14 years ago
1:40Richard Feynman: "What's the name of a bird?"
Yves Messer
48K views • 13 years ago
55:55Richard Feynman - The.Character.of.Physical.Law - Part 2 (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
638K views • 15 years ago
1:06:50The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman
Christopher Sykes
5.9M views • 8 years ago
1:15:47Richard Feynman Computer Science Lecture - Hardware, Software and Heuristics
Muon Ray
978K views • 14 years ago
7:33Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432
Christopher Sykes
1.6M views • 17 years ago
10:20Feynman: 'Greek' versus 'Babylonian' mathematics
TehPhysicalist
377K views • 14 years ago
17:15David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation
TED
245K views • 17 years ago
7:33Richard Feynman Magnets
nebulajr
999K views • 17 years ago
7:35Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!
Christopher Sykes
359K views • 8 years ago
7:07Feynman: What things really are like FUN TO IMAGINE 1
Christopher Sykes
747K views • 17 years ago
1:44Richard Feynman: The Beauty of the Flower
FreeScienceLectures
222K views • 19 years ago
7:41Richard Feynman: Magnets and Why Questions
RichardFeynmanLove
26K views • 16 years ago
1:06:50HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)
Christopher Sykes
712K views • 6 years ago
2:06Richard Feynman - Names Don't Constitute Knowledge
Caitlin Spies
110K views • 12 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
> that we cannot use empiricism to determine universal rules, we indeed cannot do this and Feynman illustrated this frequently using the analogy of chess ( ▶ this video ). As Kant argues we can never observe the rules of the physical world as things in themselves, just as we can't directly look at the rules of chess by observing games. We can only get individual hints that we piece together into models of the world in ways we can understand.
>It's nonsense, top-to-bottom. This isn't a formal physical theory, just a heuristic for evaluating lines of investigation. Richard Feynman gave a good explanation of the principle, which he said he found helpful in his work. ▶ this video
I suspect the metaphor is inspired by Feynman's one about gods playing chess [1]. As it's almost always the case, Feynman manages to immediately inspire and illuminate. On the other hand, the present article seems to me to get some important things wrong. For one, it's not the case that overall white and black win 50% of the time each. More importantly though, if somebody is interested in investigating chess, they will supposedly understand that it's some activity that other (somewhat) intelligent beings are undertaking. Even if everything seems like a blur, an alien scientist should not be content with dismissing it as uninteresting randomness. More so, if somebody actually starts investigating seriously, they will immediately obtain useful results about the game, results that should almost certainly provide useful predictions about the game outcome (at least better than "it's all random"). I might find, however, some agreement with the spirit of the article. It seems to me that, even though the author doesn't articulate it properly, the idea is that scientists should pursue more fringe theories even if immediate confirmation is lacking. I think there's quite a bit of value in this, as long as your predictions are always checked against reality. [1] ▶ this video
Science is a blackbox. We make theories about the world we live in based upon the results of experiments. Richard Feynman commented method of thinking about science on one of his videos. ▶ this video