HackerTube
HomeLongsLikedHistoryWatch laterCategoriesPlaylistsSettings

Feynman :: Rules of Chess

defjam99b1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2011-2023
YouTube
1.4M views · 19 years ago · lecture · evergreen

A three-minute clip of Richard Feynman using the rules of chess as an analogy for how science works, discovering rules by observation and sometimes meeting surprises like castling. It touches on incremental progress versus revolutions.

Cited in discussions of the scientific method and empiricism as Feynman's classic analogy of watching a game to infer its rules.

Scientific method & science communicationChess, board games & puzzles#feynman#chessanalogy#empiricism#philosophyofscience

4 comments from Hacker News

@Barrin922023 · in “Immanuel Kant–What can we know?”

> that we cannot use empiricism to determine universal rules, we indeed cannot do this and Feynman illustrated this frequently using the analogy of chess ( ▶ this video ). As Kant argues we can never observe the rules of the physical world as things in themselves, just as we can't directly look at the rules of chess by observing games. We can only get individual hints that we piece together into models of the world in ways we can understand.

CitesView on HN
@simonh2021 · in “Parable of Alien Chess”

>It's nonsense, top-to-bottom. This isn't a formal physical theory, just a heuristic for evaluating lines of investigation. Richard Feynman gave a good explanation of the principle, which he said he found helpful in his work. ▶ this video

RecommendsView on HN
@leto_ii2021 · in “Parable of Alien Chess”

I suspect the metaphor is inspired by Feynman's one about gods playing chess [1]. As it's almost always the case, Feynman manages to immediately inspire and illuminate. On the other hand, the present article seems to me to get some important things wrong. For one, it's not the case that overall white and black win 50% of the time each. More importantly though, if somebody is interested in investigating chess, they will supposedly understand that it's some activity that other (somewhat) intelligent beings are undertaking. Even if everything seems like a blur, an alien scientist should not be content with dismissing it as uninteresting randomness. More so, if somebody actually starts investigating seriously, they will immediately obtain useful results about the game, results that should almost certainly provide useful predictions about the game outcome (at least better than "it's all random"). I might find, however, some agreement with the spirit of the article. It seems to me that, even though the author doesn't articulate it properly, the idea is that scientists should pursue more fringe theories even if immediate confirmation is lacking. I think there's quite a bit of value in this, as long as your predictions are always checked against reality. [1] ▶ this video

CitesView on HN
@sevenproxies2011 · in “Gcc compile error with 2GB of data”

Science is a blackbox. We make theories about the world we live in based upon the results of experiments. Richard Feynman commented method of thinking about science on one of his videos. ▶ this video

CitesView on HN
The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman1:03

The Scientific Method-Richard Feynman

Sképseis
180K views • 13 years ago
Feynman on Scientific Method.9:59

Feynman on Scientific Method.

seabala
2.4M views • 15 years ago
R. P. Feynman on social sciences1:52

R. P. Feynman on social sciences

x1x2x3ct
210K views • 16 years ago
Feynman: Knowing versus Understanding5:37

Feynman: Knowing versus Understanding

TehPhysicalist
2.7M views • 14 years ago
Richard Feynman on Pseudoscience1:53

Richard Feynman on Pseudoscience

Jacob Edward
363K views • 10 years ago
Feynman: Mathematicians versus Physicists9:47

Feynman: Mathematicians versus Physicists

TehPhysicalist
882K views • 14 years ago
Richard Feynman: "What's the name of a bird?"1:40

Richard Feynman: "What's the name of a bird?"

Yves Messer
48K views • 13 years ago
Richard Feynman - The.Character.of.Physical.Law - Part 2 (full version)55:55

Richard Feynman - The.Character.of.Physical.Law - Part 2 (full version)

Tinkerin' Thinkers
638K views • 15 years ago
The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman1:06:50

The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman

Christopher Sykes
5.9M views • 8 years ago
Richard Feynman Computer Science Lecture - Hardware, Software and Heuristics1:15:47

Richard Feynman Computer Science Lecture - Hardware, Software and Heuristics

Muon Ray
978K views • 14 years ago
Feynman: Magnets  FUN TO IMAGINE  4  But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc4327:33

Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432

Christopher Sykes
1.6M views • 17 years ago
Feynman: 'Greek' versus 'Babylonian' mathematics10:20

Feynman: 'Greek' versus 'Babylonian' mathematics

TehPhysicalist
377K views • 14 years ago
David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation17:15

David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation

TED
245K views • 17 years ago
Richard Feynman Magnets7:33

Richard Feynman Magnets

nebulajr
999K views • 17 years ago
Feynman: Magnets (and Why?)  FUN TO IMAGINE  4/ higher quality version!7:35

Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!

Christopher Sykes
359K views • 8 years ago
Feynman: What things really are like FUN TO IMAGINE 17:07

Feynman: What things really are like FUN TO IMAGINE 1

Christopher Sykes
747K views • 17 years ago
Richard Feynman: The Beauty of the Flower1:44

Richard Feynman: The Beauty of the Flower

FreeScienceLectures
222K views • 19 years ago
Richard Feynman: Magnets and Why Questions7:41

Richard Feynman: Magnets and Why Questions

RichardFeynmanLove
26K views • 16 years ago
HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)1:06:50

HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)

Christopher Sykes
712K views • 6 years ago
Richard Feynman - Names Don't Constitute Knowledge2:06

Richard Feynman - Names Don't Constitute Knowledge

Caitlin Spies
110K views • 12 years ago