Moishe Lettvin - What I Learned Doing 250 Interviews at Google
Etsy Eng (Etsy Engineering)4 HN recommenders · recommended in 4 months, 2016-2025
713K views · 12 years ago · talk · evergreen
Moishe Lettvin, a former Google engineer, shares lessons from 250 interviews and his time on the hiring committee. He tells how the committee given anonymized packets, including its own, would hire almost none of them.
Linked often in hiring-process threads for the anecdote about Google's committee refusing to hire itself, as evidence interviews are noisy.
24:02How to: Work at Google — Example Coding/Engineering Interview
Life at Google
7.6M views • 10 years ago
1:08Winning at programming competitions is a negative factor for being good on the job
pkrumins
67K views • 11 years ago
55:17Google I/O 2009 - The Myth of the Genius Programmer
Google for Developers
1.2M views • 17 years ago
1:22:39Blitzscaling 08: Eric Schmidt on Structuring Teams and Scaling Google
Greylock
673K views • 11 years ago
1:41:38Mock Interview with Shawn McGrath
Molly Rocket
45K views • 9 years ago
1:02:51Unconscious Bias @ Work | Google Ventures
GV (Google Ventures)
393K views • 12 years ago
26:33dotJS 2012 - Fat - What Is Open Source & Why Do I Feel So Guilty?
dotconferences
73K views • 13 years ago
9:20GitHub Copilot CRUSHES Leetcode Interview Questions! 😳
DevOps Directive
266K views • 5 years ago
1:20:29Stanford Seminar - Google's Steve Yegge on GROK
Stanford Online
30K views • 14 years ago
18:12Does AI Actually Boost Developer Productivity? (100k Devs Study) - Yegor Denisov-Blanch, Stanford
AI Engineer
311K views • 1 year ago
30:50Why Google Stores Billions of Lines of Code in a Single Repository
@Scale
317K views • 11 years ago
32:32Hacker Interviews: Larry Wall
The BXI
92K views • 13 years ago
23:03Making Badass Developers - Kathy Sierra (Serious Pony) keynote
O'Reilly
380K views • 11 years ago
15:05Steve Yegge, "What Would You Do With Your Own Google?" - OSCON Data 2011
O'Reilly
66K views • 15 years ago
1:14:19NYC Tech Talk Series: How Google Backs Up the Internet
Google TechTalks
41K views • 12 years ago
25:16Debunking Devin: "First AI Software Engineer" Upwork lie exposed!
Internet of Bugs
557K views • 2 years ago
4:56Understanding the Job
Edward Capaldi
507K views • 10 years ago
40:01Keynote - Preventing, Finding, and Fixing Bugs On a Time Budget | Raymond Hettinger @ PyBay2018
SF Python
27K views • 8 years ago
2:15:36Jeff Dean & Noam Shazeer — 25 years at Google: from PageRank to AGI
Dwarkesh Patel
349K views • 1 year ago
20:03Learning from dirty jobs | Mike Rowe
TED
7.4M views • 17 years ago
12 comments from Hacker News
I've been doing this awhile, and I've seen hiring work really well without the LeetCode grilling. And I've almost always seen the LeetCode grilling be administered by someone who doesn't know what they're doing (and often also tainted with ego, despite the strange claim of some that a LeetCode grilling is objective). That said, if you're sourcing random people, good luck, it's a flood of LeetCode gamers to wade through, and too much of your staff interviewing them might also be LeetCode gamers with no experience doing non-LeetCode interviews. > Edit: BTW, where did you see Google saying their interview process doesn’t work? I have a bunch of notes on Google hiring I'd have to dig through, but the first link quick at hand is this retrospective by a hiring committee person who left (and I have a note about 8m50s being a funny story of the hiring committee realizing that they would've rejected their own packets): ▶ this video (IIRC, I don't agree with all the beliefs he still holds, but he calls out a lot of problems they found.)
As someone who interviews and hires engineers I'm not even remotely convinced live code exercises lead to better hiring than any other signal such as a CS degree. I remember when the the coding horror fizz buzz article came out and honestly things have just gotten worse since then. I always like to link the talk where the speaker mentions google hiring committee refused to hire themselves [0]. I suggest that this outcome isn't rare. [0] ▶ this video
If there's anything suggested by comments on HN posts about hiring, it's that people don't know how to hire, and just make stuff up. I'm reminded of the talk by the ex-Google hiring committee person, who reported that not only did their research show that the interviewers' ratings didn't predict the relative performance of people who were hired, but also that his entire committee rejected all of their own (anonymized) interview review packets. ▶ this video
Found it, and I'm pleasantly surprised that it seems credible (much more credible than the LinkedIn post): ▶ this video from "Moishe Lettvin - What I Learned Doing 250 Interviews at Google"
I think this is half the problem when people interview at FAANGs -- they think it's like preparing for olympics and you truly have to be in the top 1%. It's really not. There's thousands and thousands of engineers, from mediocre to truly great. With the right preparation, a lot of it just comes down to getting lucky with who interviews, how they're feeling that day, etc -- luck. You might find this interesting: ▶ this video
I don't know if it's true but during a video talk there was a story that a team of googlers were secretly given their own feedback ratings and they didn't hire themselves. ▶ this video
If anyone is curious, it might be this talk. Moishe Lettvin - What I Learned Doing 250 Interviews at Google. It is on Etsy Eng channel Youtube url with the relevant time frame ▶ this video
Here’s an Xoogler talking about how he was given his own hiring packet to review (without knowing it was his) and rejected it: ▶ this video
I like this video: ▶ this video The speaker formerly worked at Google, and around 8:55 in the video relates the story of being on a hiring committee that was known for being tough on candidates. And a recruiter once forwarded a set of interview packets to them, and they voted "no hire" on all of them. The recruiter then revealed to the committee that they'd been given their own packets, slightly anonymized, from when they were interviewed, and had just voted against hiring themselves.
▶ this video In this video, a Google hiring committee were given their own anonymized hiring feedback and wouldn't even hire themselves.
Like with any BigCo, there are always bad apples (recruiters) and things slip through cracks. But compared to other similar sized companies, Google is quite focused on improving their interview processes. You can find lots of resources online from Google employees explaining it. The one I found very enlightening is from Moishe Lettvin given at Etsy: ▶ this video My own personal experience couple of years ago was good. I failed the interview though.
Moishe Lettvin - What I Learned Doing 250 Interviews at Google ▶ this video He tells a story where the hiring committee gets like 10 candidate packets, and they refuse to hire a single one of them. Turns out the packets were of the hiring committee members themselves:) ▶ this video So yeah, the system is broken.