Geoffrey Hinton talk "What is wrong with convolutional neural nets ?"
trwappers2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2017-2018
200K views · 9 years ago · lecture · dated
Geoffrey Hinton gives an MIT talk on what is wrong with convolutional neural networks and introduces his capsules project. The description points to the capsule network papers.
Recommended as Hinton's own explanation of capsule networks and his critique of pooling in CNNs.
1:05:18Recent Developments in Deep Learning
Google TechTalks
85K views • 16 years ago
1:48:12Geoffrey Hinton in conversation with Fei-Fei Li — Responsible AI development
Arts & Science - University of Toronto
226K views • 2 years ago
42:30Full interview: "Godfather of artificial intelligence" talks impact and potential of AI
CBS Mornings
2M views • 3 years ago
47:15Will AI outsmart human intelligence? - with 'Godfather of AI' Geoffrey Hinton
The Royal Institution
878K views • 1 year ago
1:25Geoff Hinton: On Radiology
Creative Destruction Lab
45K views • 9 years ago
1:19:08CS231n Winter 2016: Lecture1: Introduction and Historical Context
Andrej Karpathy
462K views • 10 years ago
1:00:19Brains, Sex, and Machine Learning
Google TechTalks
152K views • 14 years ago
57:57Lecture 1 | Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Recognition
Stanford University School of Engineering
2.9M views • 9 years ago
1:31:13A Hackers' Guide to Language Models
Jeremy Howard
580K views • 3 years ago
1:11:41Lecture 1 | Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning
Stanford University School of Engineering
820K views • 9 years ago
12:47Backpropagation, intuitively | Deep Learning Chapter 3
3Blue1Brown
6.4M views • 9 years ago
1:22:56Practical Deep Learning for Coders: Lesson 1
Jeremy Howard
610K views • 4 years ago
3:07Neural Networks Demystified [Part 1: Data and Architecture]
Welch Labs
838K views • 12 years ago
2:35:53Tensorflow and deep learning - without a PhD by Martin Görner
Devoxx
610K views • 10 years ago
1:22:38CS480/680 Lecture 19: Attention and Transformer Networks
Pascal Poupart
374K views • 7 years ago
18:40But what is a neural network? | Deep learning chapter 1
3Blue1Brown
25.1M views • 9 years ago
59:23Why Can't AI Make Its Own Discoveries? — With Yann LeCun
Alex Kantrowitz
222K views • 1 year ago
20:33Gradient descent, how neural networks learn | Deep Learning Chapter 2
3Blue1Brown
9.7M views • 9 years ago
1:02:06Building Brains to Understand the World's Data
Google TechTalks
84K views • 13 years ago
59:48[1hr Talk] Intro to Large Language Models
Andrej Karpathy
4.3M views • 2 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
I'm certain that AI business will plateau and there will be yet another AI winter without new big breakthroughs in fundamental research. We are currently living in a era where the results from Hinton & Canadian Mafia are still begin adopted and refined. It's just alternating layers of affine transformations and nonlinearity with lots of tricks and improved routing. There needs to be fundamental theoretical breakthrough in every decade or so, and not just refinements and new applications. Hinton made his "What is wrong with convolutional neural nets" speech years ago " ▶ this video I believe that Hinton's capsule networks type attempts are what we need more. They may not deliver immediately impressive results because fundamental research involves lots of setbacks.
Hinton's "capsule networks": link ▶ this video link They sound a bit like "grandmother neurons/cells": link I would very much appreciate an ELI5 of capsules and some prognostications about how capsules may affect the state of the art in neural networks and the current flood of papers and graduate students in the pipeline of ML.
Hinton explains the concept of capsules in this video: ▶ this video Which is a lot better than reading someone tell you about this new idea that is called "capsules" but doesn't go into detail. The only thing is that, when this presentation was given, it seems they hadn't worked much more than MNIST (so the new thing now would be the toys-recognition net). Better source, with date: link (December 2014, for the lazy).
I have a hypothesis that these errors in interpretation stem mainly from the max pooling layers that occurs in nearly all CNNs today. Simply cutting out a large fraction (at least 75%!) of the information passing through each pooling layer is making the models quite brittle. That, and obviously it would be a big help to be able to interpret meaningful symbols (e.g. words) from the images rather than just recognize a certain arbitrary class of pattern activations. That is pretty hard, of course, but IMO essential for the upcoming self-driving car revolution, if it is to succeed. G. Hinton has some ideas though they aren't very fleshed out yet.[1] [1] ▶ this video
Prof. Hinton has an interesting talk about his new 'capsule' model based on psychology of shape perception: ▶ this video