Soylent: How I Stopped Eating for 30 Days
MotherboardCited 5× on HN, 2016-2016
4.1M views · 13 years ago · documentary · dated
A Motherboard documentary in which a reporter lives on nothing but Soylent for 30 days after founder Rob Rhinehart's own experiment. It looks at the effects on health, Silicon Valley and the future of food.
HN rarely recommends it; it is mostly cited in critical threads on Soylent's quality control, including footage of a rodent at its warehouse.
1:00:16Evidence-Based Weight Loss: Live Presentation
NutritionFacts.org
1.4M views • 6 years ago
1:18:16Valter Longo, Ph.D. on Fasting-Mimicking Diet & Fasting for Longevity, Cancer & Multiple Sclerosis
FoundMyFitness
847K views • 10 years ago
1:29:37Sugar: THE BITTER TRUTH
University of California Television (UCTV)
25.7M views • 17 years ago
12:50Fasting vs. Eating Less: What's the Difference? (Science of Fasting)
Joseph Everett - WIL
13.2M views • 9 years ago
19:13What is the best diet for humans? | Eran Segal | TEDxRuppin
TEDx Talks
4.2M views • 10 years ago
1:52:15How to Enhance Your Gut Microbiome for Brain & Overall Health
Andrew Huberman
1.1M views • 4 years ago
28:21The $100 Billion Dollar Ingredient making your Food Toxic
Joseph Everett - WIL
4.4M views • 5 years ago
21:26The mathematics of weight loss | Ruben Meerman | TEDxQUT (edited version)
TEDx Talks
12.6M views • 13 years ago
25:22The '5kg in 50 days' Diet!
Thunderf00t
205K views • 9 years ago
1:28:31FoodGate: The Break-in, the Cover-up, & the Aftermath
University of California Television (UCTV)
2.1M views • 8 years ago
1:20:59Fasting For Survival Lecture by Dr Pradip Jamnadas
The Galen Foundation
11.4M views • 7 years ago
3:29:21How Sugar & Processed Foods Impact Your Health | Dr. Robert Lustig
Andrew Huberman
5.1M views • 2 years ago
57:39Debunking Dr. Robert Lustig's Claims from The Huberman Lab Podcast | Educational Video | Biolayne
Dr. Layne Norton
261K views • 2 years ago
1:39:37Is a Calorie a Calorie? Processed Food, Experiment Gone Wrong
Stanford Health Care
12M views • 11 years ago
17:13The food we were born to eat: John McDougall at TEDxFremont
TEDx Talks
3.9M views • 13 years ago
1:16:43The Battle of the Diets: Is Anyone Winning (At Losing?)
Stanford
309K views • 18 years ago
1:27:51Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It | Gary Taubes | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
218K views • 15 years ago
1:31:34Dr. Satchin Panda on Time-Restricted Feeding and Its Effects on Obesity, Muscle Mass & Heart Health
FoundMyFitness
806K views • 10 years ago
1:21:13Dr. Michael Greger | How Not To Die | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
1.4M views • 10 years ago
1:26:15Fat Chance: Fructose 2.0
University of California Television (UCTV)
7.3M views • 13 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
Sorry for the strong language but bullshit. I am sure it has changed over the years but I still have vivid memories of the rodents that ran around the original warehouse they mixed soylent in. It was a joke. They had a bunch of randos mixing powders haphazardly and no sense of proper food prep/sanitation. It was scarier than some of the operations that supplement manufacturers run. I am sure its changed but it blows my mind that this is classified as an ambitious project. Edit: Here is the video. ▶ this video
Soylent is classified as a nutritional supplement, which isn't the same as "food". It's the same umbrella things like body-building supplements enjoy being under, with far more relaxed requirements than "food". Sources are well known, a quick search turns them up[1][2][3]. The testing procedure has been disclosed by Soylent during their last debacle, and there was discussion here on HN[3][4]. I used to buy Soylent myself, started at version 1.5 (powder in the bag). But come on, this sort of thing is seriously not OK. You need better quality control, and you need better (and more rapid) testing of product as it rolls off the line. Hunt and pecking clearly isn't getting it done, and problems are slipping out under their noses. It's people's health - nothing to joke at. "Move fast; make people sick" isn't a good mantra. > FWIW, the ingredient in question is "generally recognized as safe" by the FDA Soylent has no real idea if that ingredient was the culprit (and from the FDA's classification, it seems reasonable to suspect that ingredient is not the problem). For all anyone knows, it could be a combination of ingredients, or not an ingredient at all, but rather contamination in the manufacturing process. [1] link [2] link [3] link [4] link [5] ▶ this video
> How might they acquire that knowledge, other than through the process they seem to currently be executing? Well, a lot of folks would like to see a bit more care paid attention to the entire process. This isn't the first time Soylent has shipped potentially dangerous product. Not long ago, they shipped their new bottled formula to folks, and it arrived covered in mold! Their snack bars have made people violently ill, and now their powder too. Every product Soylent makes, is making or has made people ill. Soylent has practically zero quality control/testing, and doesn't have on-site staff dedicated to ensuring their product is safe. They send out a few carefully selected samples to an external lab, but that's far from continuous testing of the product rolling off the line. Some might attribute it to the "silicon valley" mindset Soylent has. "We'll disrupt the food industry - but we won't bother to learn what it takes to produce uniformly clean and safe product". There's good reasons the "big guys" spend so much on lab personnel and equipment. If people all around the world started getting sick from Coca-Cola, it wouldn't be good - to say the least. Edit - Adding sources: [1] link [2] link [3] link [4] link [5] ▶ this video
Maybe the rats finally got in: ▶ this video Explanation: at least in 2013 they were producing the "food" in an abandoned old factory with disgustingly little care for hygiene. A TV crew caught on film a rat sneaking around in their "production facility".
I remember when the Soylent-Creator was on the Colbert Report, and he clearly marketed it as a 100% food replacement. Saying that you don't have to replace food with it completely is smart, it opens up additional customers, makes sense. Their Soylent promotional video however makes the claim that 1) it can replace any meal 2) while not having to replace every meal, it certainly insinuates it can (which is way different from other supplements). link I also do remember the piece by motherboard on Soylent ▶ this video Fair, they were a small operation back then, but even if it might not tell you how they work now, it certainly shows you how low the standards are. Their facilities don't even have to be inspected, ... at all. So you are too tired to cook, but fit enough to run? And usually I have to get dressed, have to shower, pack up my things, work over my schedule, read some mails, activities where I can have something on the stove at the same time. If something needs 10 minutes to cook I am not staring into the pot for the duration. The composition of the ingredients does not tell me how they know, where they buy, anything in beyond. I rather see food, touch it, smell it, know where it's from, I don't really bother about whether the fish I just bought has 1 gram fat more or less, that's not the "quality" in food I am looking for.