Richard Feynman Lecture -- "Los Alamos From Below"
The Quagmire3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2018-2023
1.3M views · 10 years ago · lecture · evergreen
A 78-minute Richard Feynman lecture of anecdotes about working at Los Alamos on the Manhattan Project, followed by about ten minutes of audience Q&A in which he tells three safe-cracking stories.
Strongly recommended for its funny, human account of Los Alamos, which one commenter calls almost a stand-up act.
9:01Feynman: Take the world from another point of view (1/4)
Aaron Scher
1.5M views • 18 years ago
1:06:50HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)
Christopher Sykes
712K views • 6 years ago
1:35:39Horizon: Richard Feynman - No Ordinary Genius (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
664K views • 15 years ago
2:48:11the sham legacy of Richard Feynman
Angela Collier
1.2M views • 1 year ago
5:31Murray Gell-Mann talks about Richard Feynman
Muon Ray
254K views • 14 years ago
1:06:50The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman
Christopher Sykes
5.9M views • 8 years ago
1:19:47Richard Feynman "Tiny Machines" Nanotechnology Lecture - aka "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom"
Muon Ray
543K views • 14 years ago
5:55Richard Feynman talks about light
sdfhsfh
1.8M views • 19 years ago
56:04Richard Feynman - The.Character of Physical Law - Part 1 The Law of Gravitation (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
1.4M views • 15 years ago
59:19The Extreme World of Ultra Intense Lasers - with Kate Lancaster
The Royal Institution
859K views • 11 years ago
56:04Richard Feynman Messenger Lectures at Cornell The Character of Physical Law Part 1 The Law of Gravitation
TalkReelTV
163K views • 14 years ago
7:07Feynman: What things really are like FUN TO IMAGINE 1
Christopher Sykes
747K views • 17 years ago
35:50Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
7:35Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!
Christopher Sykes
359K views • 8 years ago
52:04Lecture by Douglas Hofstadter: Albert Einstein on Light; Light on Albert Einstein
Uppsala universitet
23K views • 8 years ago
7:33Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432
Christopher Sykes
1.6M views • 17 years ago
3:16Feynman: Mirrors FUN TO IMAGINE 6
Christopher Sykes
600K views • 18 years ago
55:55Richard Feynman - The.Character.of.Physical.Law - Part 2 (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
638K views • 15 years ago
1:05:29Nuclear 101: How Nuclear Bombs Work Part 1/2
Belfer Center
2.6M views • 13 years ago
56:11A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
The Royal Institution
4.7M views • 6 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
I spent a fair amount of time during the film playing 'Spot Jack Quaid' in anticipation of Feynman being called out at some point. He is spotted early during the montage when Oppenheimer goes recruiting, and then during various scenes in the background, twice playing bongos (!), but only once is he called by name- Teller calls his name right before the Trinity test for not having goggles or a welding glass to look through, and he notes he is in a truck with a thick windshield that blocks the UV. I smiled so much when that little tidbit happens, as it is a story he prominently tells in his book 'Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman...' He gives an incredible account of his time there in the lecture (and almost stand-up-comedy act) 'Los Alamos from Below' - ▶ this video So highly entertaining.
If the fissile core is anything like the original Trinity test one, it relies on a solid ball of plutonium metal being compacted to reach criticality (modern ones may be hollow). This means the explosion wavefront needs to arrive simultaneously all around the ball. This is hard! A ton of the computational effort legendarily described by Feynman with his IBM tabulator/multiple coloured cards story was, I believe, just to make this work. Link to the relevant part (the whole lecture is a hoot). ▶ this video Anyway the original bomb had a lot of detonators all around that needed to be fired right. Modern ones have only two, from the little I've seen in published imagery. link One hopes this is arranged so simultaneous firing of both detonators results in a fizzle, and a precise stagger is needed. Either way though, an external explosive force will just disassemble the thing, not cause it to go off.
I highly recommend this talk by Richard Feynman on Los Alamos: ▶ this video . His personal anecdote on some interesting details while he was working there.