HackerTube
HomeLongsLikedHistoryWatch laterCategoriesPlaylistsSettings

speed limits

Interview×Play all on YouTube

Upload date

Past year2020s2010s2000s

Type

TalkLectureExplainerTutorialDocumentaryInterviewDemoCommentaryComedyMusic

Duration

Under 4 minutes4-20 minutes20-60 minutesOver 1 hour

Features

Hidden gemsEvergreen only

Sort by

RelevanceRecently recommendedUpload dateOldest firstView countLike ratioMost recommended
No strong matches for “speed limits”. Here are the closest videos.
Grace Hopper on Letterman10:00

Grace Hopper on Letterman

448K views • 13 years ago
TheLazlo101
Grace Hopper appears on Letterman and uses a foot-long piece of wire to show how far light travels in a nanosecond.
Richard Sutton – Father of RL thinks LLMs are a dead end1:07:09

Richard Sutton – Father of RL thinks LLMs are a dead end

804K views • 1 year ago
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel interviews Richard Sutton, reinforcement learning pioneer, Turing Award winner and author of The Bitter Lesson. Sutton argues LLMs are a dead end because they cannot learn on the job, and that continual learning from experience will require a new architecture.
Feynman: Magnets (and Why?)  FUN TO IMAGINE  4/ higher quality version!7:35

Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!

359K views • 8 years ago
Christopher Sykes
A 1983 BBC interview in which Richard Feynman is asked how magnets work and explains why 'why' questions are hard to answer in everyday terms. He reflects on what counts as an explanation and the limits of analogy.
Richard Feynman. Why.7:33

Richard Feynman. Why.

5.5M views • 14 years ago
firewalker
A short clip of Richard Feynman answering an interviewer's question about why magnets repel, explaining that a 'why' question depends on a shared framework of understanding. It illustrates how hard it is to explain fundamentals to a layperson.
Richard Feynman Magnets7:33

Richard Feynman Magnets

999K views • 17 years ago
nebulajr
A short clip of Richard Feynman answering an interviewer's question about how magnets work, in which he explains why a why-question has no simple answer without a shared frame of reference.
Feynman: Magnets  FUN TO IMAGINE  4  But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc4327:33

Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432

1.6M views • 17 years ago
Christopher Sykes
A clip from the BBC Fun to Imagine series in which Richard Feynman is asked how magnets work and explains why 'why' questions depend on a shared framework of understanding and cannot always be answered in layman's terms.
A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship17:06

A conversation with Elon Musk about Starship

3.2M views • 7 years ago
Everyday Astronaut
Tim Dodd of Everyday Astronaut talks with Elon Musk right after Musk's 2019 Starship presentation. Musk discusses Starship's design, why SpaceX favors conventional engines over aerospikes, and how deleting parts and processes speeds up development.
TypeScript is being ported to Go | interview with Anders Hejlsberg1:01:31

TypeScript is being ported to Go | interview with Anders Hejlsberg

102K views • 1 year ago
Michigan TypeScript
An interview with Anders Hejlsberg, lead architect of TypeScript, about porting the TypeScript compiler to Go. He covers the 10x type-checking speedup, lower memory use, and why Go was chosen.
Ray Summit 2022 - Day 1 Keynote - Fireside Chat18:22

Ray Summit 2022 - Day 1 Keynote - Fireside Chat

6K views • 4 years ago
Anyscale
A Ray Summit 2022 keynote fireside chat between OpenAI's Greg Brockman and Anyscale's Robert Nishihara. They discuss how OpenAI's training infrastructure evolved and its use of Ray.
Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI Chief Scientist) — Why next-token prediction could surpass human intelligence47:41

Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI Chief Scientist) — Why next-token prediction could surpass human intelligence

789K views • 3 years ago
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel interviews OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever on time to AGI, what comes after generative models, data limits, alignment, and competing with Google. The title centers on whether next-token prediction could surpass human intelligence.