Does the language you speak change how you think?
Tom Scott1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2023-2024
1.6M views · 3 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Tom Scott, with linguists Gretchen McCulloch and Molly Ruhl, examines whether the language you speak changes how you think. The short answer is mostly no, with caveats about the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
Linked as a concise, accessible rebuttal whenever linguistic relativity comes up in a thread.
10:54RSA ANIMATE: Language as a Window into Human Nature
Royal Society of Arts
1.6M views • 15 years ago
17:01Your Brain Hallucinates Your Conscious Reality | Anil Seth | TED
TED
12M views • 9 years ago
4:31why typing like this is sometimes okay.
Tom Scott
5.4M views • 7 years ago
18:41Why our IQ levels are higher than our grandparents' | James Flynn
TED
3.2M views • 13 years ago
1:15:05The Stuff of Thought | Steven Pinker | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
419K views • 19 years ago
21:03Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are | Amy Cuddy | TED
TED
29.4M views • 14 years ago
15:25Stephen Krashen on Language Acquisition
Mark Rounds
1.5M views • 16 years ago
21:51Do we see reality as it is? | Donald Hoffman | TED
TED
3.1M views • 11 years ago
27:44The Concept of Language (Noam Chomsky)
UW Video
2.1M views • 12 years ago
1:42:4723. Language
Stanford
1.2M views • 15 years ago
15:26Stephen Krashen: Language Acquisition and Comprehensible Input
Tarek Hamza
186K views • 10 years ago
19:19Was Penrose Right? NEW EVIDENCE For Quantum Effects In The Brain
PBS Space Time
1.1M views • 2 years ago
2:50:45Edward Gibson: Human Language, Psycholinguistics, Syntax, Grammar & LLMs | Lex Fridman Podcast #426
Lex Fridman
471K views • 2 years ago
1:06:15The Hyperbolic Geometry of DMT Experiences (@Harvard Science of Psychedelics Club)
Qualia Research Institute
1.4M views • 7 years ago
1:16:22If Brains are Computers, Who Designs the Software? - with Daniel Dennett
The Royal Institution
873K views • 9 years ago
18:15So... the minute hand shows progression — apparently we think of time in wildly different ways
Technology Connextras
706K views • 4 years ago
6:46The surprising pattern behind color names around the world
Vox
8.4M views • 9 years ago
19:00Optical illusions show how we see | Beau Lotto
TED
3.5M views • 17 years ago
58:58George Lakoff: Moral Politics
University of California Television (UCTV)
201K views • 18 years ago
11:48RSA ANIMATE: The Divided Brain
Royal Society of Arts
2.2M views • 15 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
Note that Orwell promotes an hard form of the Sapir Whorf hypothesis called linguistic determinism meaning that a language would make it impossible think certain thoughts. This is obviously wrong. Have you ever experienced anything for which you didn't have the words to explain? This already proves that you can feel and think things that are not easily expressed in the languages you know. Also some people don't even think in words but are more visual thinkers. But even for the softer version, linguistic relativism, these is not much hard evidence. You subjective experience is not easily measurable. Yes, the act of learning new languages can gives you new perspectives and enrich you as a person because it gives you access to a whole new culture but that is different to saying you can suddenly experience new forms of emotions because you didn't have the words for it before or see more colors. I recommend this Tom Scott video on the issue: ▶ this video
Tom Scott recently did a video about how linguistic relativity (Sapir-Whorf) is almost certainly not true: ▶ this video It's an alluring idea, but it's been debunked.
Related video which I just remembered: ▶ this video So it seems languages might not change how you think, but might be able to emphasize certain aspects of things like you allude to (I believe).