"Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers: Stress and Health" by Dr. Robert Sapolsky
Beckman Institute at Illinois5 HN recommenders · recommended in 6 months, 2019-2025
1.1M views · 9 years ago · lecture · evergreen
Robert Sapolsky's lecture on how the body's stress response, evolved for short-term physical emergencies, harms long-term health when triggered by psychological stressors. It was given as the inaugural Fenton-Rhodes Lecture.
HN commenters recommend it as an entertaining and informative explanation of how stress affects health.
9:02Why hierarchy creates a destructive force within the human psyche (by dr. Robert Sapolsky)
TheSymposionNights
322K views • 14 years ago
57:151. Introduction to Human Behavioral Biology
Stanford
20.5M views • 15 years ago
1:22:47Dr. Robert Sapolsky's lecture about Biological Underpinnings of Religiosity
Aprendiendo Juntos
874K views • 14 years ago
52:29Stanford's Sapolsky On Depression in U.S. (Full Lecture)
Stanford
6.4M views • 17 years ago
1:13:13Robert Sapolsky: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst
Stanford Iranian Studies Program
1.5M views • 8 years ago
1:21:55Irving Kirsch: The Emperor's New Drugs
Mizzou Visual Productions
13K views • 12 years ago
1:07:46Joe Rogan Experience #965 - Robert Sapolsky
PowerfulJRE
1.7M views • 9 years ago
1:28:4414. Limbic System
Stanford
2M views • 15 years ago
1:55:33Joe Rogan Experience #1109 - Matthew Walker
PowerfulJRE
9.9M views • 8 years ago
54:52Why We Sleep: Science of Sleep & Dreams | Matthew Walker | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
751K views • 8 years ago
1:02:31How Your Brain Works & Changes
Andrew Huberman
2.1M views • 5 years ago
1:42:4723. Language
Stanford
1.2M views • 15 years ago
16:24Cynthia Kenyon: Experiments that hint of longer lives
TED
98K views • 14 years ago
2:07:01Maximizing Productivity, Physical & Mental Health with Daily Tools
Andrew Huberman
813K views • 5 years ago
2:01:02What Alcohol Does to Your Body, Brain & Health
Andrew Huberman
8.1M views • 4 years ago
22:21Depression is a disease of civilization: Stephen Ilardi at TEDxEmory
TEDx Talks
2.5M views • 13 years ago
21:20The surprising science of happiness | Dan Gilbert
TED
4.7M views • 14 years ago
1:17:16Matter to Mind:Bioelectricity, Body Intelligence, Future of Regenerative Medicine- Dr. Michael Levin
Harvard Extension Student Psychological Club
23K views • 3 years ago
53:24Breakthrough with Healing Chronic Pain | Howard Schubiner | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
500K views • 8 years ago
14:37The most important lesson from 83,000 brain scans | Daniel Amen | TEDxOrangeCoast
TEDx Talks
24.4M views • 13 years ago
6 comments from Hacker News
He's also given many talks which are on youtube on the topic, one of which is his talk of the same name at the Beckman institute [1]. It's a little under 90 minutes and is enormously entertaining as well as being informative. [1] ▶ this video
A perhaps easier to understand explanation of this is this part of a Robert Sapolsky talk on stress, prepositioned to the bit where he talks about the interaction of stress with the bacteria [1]. The summary is that the body is good at repairing the damage the bacteria do, unless the person is under constant stress which inhibits the repair work. [1] ▶ this video
Sapolsky has been at this for many years. Here's a great talk on one of his older books. ▶ this video Especially with regards to his commentary on Selye's theories/lab work with rats. Makes sense if you've read a good number of books on stress (i.e. Stress of Life, Sapolsky's work, etc)
I'm sure it's been said many times, but John Cleese did provide a memorable talk on it [1] and particularly touched on the relation to stress. And if anyone feels like they have troubles with stress/anxiety, Robert Sapolsky provides some great insight into how and why it affects health overall [2]. I'm not sure if Sapolsky's material will help reduce stress, but it was pretty entertaining along the way. Two great speeches that it would be a shame to lose. Now, what was that about keeping up with digital clutter? [1] link [2] ▶ this video
I don't know... honestly. I was extremely surprised. I was actually wondering if they switched to some level of human in the loop, because it used to suck in the past, but now is great. I expected people to have good experiences too. I 'm actually shocked to see how disappointed people are here... Here's an example of some stuff that just showed up recently. [1] Some guy camping an exploring an island that used to be a federal prison - link [2] A documentary about homeless people racing carts - link [3] Fantastic funk music (and I don't even listen to funk!) - link [4] Fantastic old school theatrical hard rock from Japan - link [5] Sapolsky's must-see lecture on stress - ▶ this video (which I got recommended and was watching this morning in the background while I worked) Just a random sample from stuff that popped up in the recent past. All the above captured my curiosity 100%. Maybe it's a personality thing, maybe I am eager to just discover novel stuff, that the quality level might not be the highest but the novel factor covers for it.
The "active amygdala = no empathy" point does not jibe with my lay understanding of the physical phenomenon of empathy. That's the only one that I don't believe models our physiology in a useful way. The rest match up with some of the stuff I've read/watched. Watch some videos by Robert Sapolsky on YouTube. He's a neurostuff prof at Stanford. Good presentations. There's "Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers" ▶ this video Also an actual academic lecture on the Limbic System which contextualizes & clarifies some of the other assertions in the OP blog post. link There are more but hopefully YouTube's algorithm helps you out there. The Stanford lecture series is very interesting though Sapolsky doesn't deliver all the lectures. edit: The only plausible, good faith explanation of the amygdala-empathy claim I can think of is that there are facial recognition studies designed to activate the amygdala link that showed some correlation between anxiety levels and ACC-amygdala connectivity. The ACC, or anterior cingulate cortex, is held to be responsible for empathy. So it may be an interpretation of that knowledge the author is talking about. I know that facial recognition tests are used for evaluation of empathy, sexual attraction and so on. This is probably the kernel of accuracy in the claim. Or there may be other science on the topic that reaches a conclusion closer to what the author said. The linked study is extremely interesting read.