The Computer Designed To Die In Microseconds
Scott ManleyCited 3× on HN, 2023-2025
408K views · 3 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Scott Manley tells the story of a computerized telemetry system built to sit at the heart of a nuclear test device in place of the plutonium pit, designed to transmit data in the microseconds before it was destroyed.
HN mentions it only in passing, as a reference for instrumented dummy warheads and implosion-test data in nuclear-testing threads.
5:15Megaprocessor Tour 1 - (fixed audio)
Megaprocessor
479K views • 10 years ago
10:00Nuclear Detonation Timeline "1945-1998"
Don't Blink
1.2M views • 16 years ago
59:23Quick Start, Episode 7: Crimes... And Felonies.
Cathode Ray Dude - CRD
235K views • 2 years ago
2:55:13Oral History of Gary Davidian, part 2 of 2
Computer History Museum
2K views • 7 years ago
1:02:09Seymour Cray's Only Surviving Talk: "Cray-1 Introduction" (1976, LANL)
UC Berkeley Events
59K views • 16 years ago
2:39:39Oral History of William David "Bill" Mensch Jr.
Computer History Museum
12K views • 11 years ago
1:21:07David Patterson - A New Golden Age for Computer Architecture: History, Challenges and Opportunities
UBC Computer Science
99K views • 7 years ago
1:27:31Oral History of John Backus
Computer History Museum
18K views • 13 years ago
1:02:28A History of The ARM Microprocessor | Dave Jaggar | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
22K views • 7 years ago
1:00:26Colossus - The Greatest Secret in the History of Computing
The Centre for Computing History
1M views • 6 years ago
2:04Admiral Grace Hopper Explains the Nanosecond
funbury
163K views • 14 years ago
22:24Lyle Bickley explains the PDP-1 (and we play the original Spacewar!)
CuriousMarc
431K views • 9 years ago
3:55:45Oral History of Chuck Peddle
Computer History Museum
42K views • 7 years ago
1:00:38The History of Unix, Rob Pike
Stephanie Borgman
120K views • 8 years ago
1:17:07Plan 9: Not dead, Just Resting, by Ori Bernstein
BSDTV
42K views • 7 years ago
49:39NeWS: A Networked and Extensible Window System, lecture by James Gosling
Computer History Museum
5K views • 10 years ago
14:25A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by Isao Hashimoto
aConcernedHuman
15.8M views • 16 years ago
19:54BeOS DEMO VIDEO
koyhoge
63K views • 15 years ago
1:00:34Chuck Moore's Fireside Chat 2011
GreenArraysInc
6K views • 14 years ago
1:25:57Grace Hopper Lecture
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
68K views • 9 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
I wonder what PDC's test and warranty processes are. Hopefully, it's not like this: Customer: "Hello, can you hear me? I'd like a refund in gold or survival meals." Tech support: "Sorry, what?" Customer: "It didn't work!" Tech support: " Did you try turning it on and off again?" Customer: " There's nothing left to reset. There's no plug, button, wire, or electricity, only a smoking crater. But at least it should've last a few milliseconds." [0] Tech support: "I'm afraid I'm going to need a valid serial number, vendor ID, order number, and support contract PIN to proceed providing exceptional service." Customer: "Oh well, corporate tech support flowcharts strike again. It was worth a shot. Go into the wasteland in peace, my friend." 0. The Computer Designed To Die in Milliseconds (yt @scottmanley) ▶ this video
> undue delay related to aging circuitry So instead of a dumb inert core you use a smart inert core that broadcasts precise measurements of the implosion using fiber optics and triboluminescent capsules that flash as they are crushed. ▶ this video But yes, I still share your overall concern even if we can push the question marks one step later in the delicate process.
Politely, this computer exists because the DoE performs stockpile stewardship. Less politely, it exists because of The Bombs. Everything else it will do is a hobby. It is specifically designed for whatever compute needs their classified program has. link link All of this capital is being spent because the test ban treaty prohibits the detonation of these weapons, but the US stockpile and its efficacy must be maintained and new weapons must be designed. So how do you know if an old weapon or a new design will work or not? Some part of the answer is real data + simulations. Lots and lots of simulations. It's why Frontier exists and why the DoE has pursued exascale compute for quite some time. (as for the real data part, it's why places like the National Ignition Factory exist, and why there's an active experimental program that exists to study dummy warheads in unexpected ways, ▶ this video )