Bayes theorem, the geometry of changing beliefs
3Blue1Brown2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2022-2024
6M views · 6 years ago · explainer · evergreen
3Blue1Brown presents Bayes' theorem through a geometric diagram, showing how evidence should update beliefs. It works through the Kahneman and Tversky style questions and base rates.
HN people recommend it as the most intuitive introduction to Bayes' theorem and cite it in base-rate arguments.
21:14The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule
3Blue1Brown
1.4M views • 5 years ago
10:37The Bayesian Trap
Veritasium
4.5M views • 9 years ago
11:25A visual guide to Bayesian thinking
Julia Galef
2.2M views • 11 years ago
46:29Lecture 1: Probability and Counting | Statistics 110
Harvard University
1.8M views • 13 years ago
25:13Thinking outside the 10-dimensional box
3Blue1Brown
3.2M views • 9 years ago
10:43Bertrand's Paradox (with 3blue1brown) - Numberphile
Numberphile
1.4M views • 4 years ago
9:52Vectors | Chapter 1, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
13M views • 10 years ago
5:09Essence of linear algebra preview
3Blue1Brown
2.8M views • 10 years ago
24:14The Banach–Tarski Paradox
Vsauce
49.1M views • 11 years ago
6:23How We Should Vote (Range Voting)
Undefined Behavior
43K views • 10 years ago
10:03The determinant | Chapter 6, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
5M views • 10 years ago
17:35Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox
minutephysics
8.1M views • 9 years ago
32:32The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) Anything
Veritasium
13.1M views • 1 year ago
57:03HACKENBUSH: a window to a new world of math
Owen Maitzen
562K views • 5 years ago
1:07:02Stanford Lecture: Don Knuth—"A Conjecture That Had To Be True" (2017)
Stanford Online
30K views • 8 years ago
31:51Visualizing the 4d numbers Quaternions
3Blue1Brown
5.6M views • 8 years ago
17:16Eigenvectors and eigenvalues | Chapter 14, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
6.4M views • 10 years ago
17:05The essence of calculus
3Blue1Brown
11.9M views • 9 years ago
48:55Pythagoras' theorem (a) | Math History | NJ Wildberger
Insights into Mathematics
517K views • 15 years ago
50:27Hamming, "n-Dimensional Space" (April 14, 1995)
securitylectures
14K views • 14 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
Probably, but more likely a lack of knowledge and an overestimation of their knowledge. People are famously bad with statistics but people are also famously over confident in their understanding of numbers and data. I mean cloud servers really try to get some extra 9s on the end of their uptime. (People are also __terrible__ with rates of change. e.g. 90% increase as from last year). But I think an interesting one is the also literally the most common example that's in many stats textbooks, at least the ones that cover Bayesian stats. That being that if a test is 95% accurate, that it does not mean that that scoring positive on a test means that there's a 95% chance you have whatever the test is testing for. I think there's a great irony in the latter, as I find in the tech and engineering communities a lot of confidence, especially in understanding numbers yet very often make this mistake[0], and frequently want to establish meritocracies (advocating for standardized testing and leet code). But understanding the former should result in thinking the latter is ineffective.[1] -------------------------------- [0] I particularly like 3Blue1Brown's introduction to Bayes theorem as it includes the Kahneman and Tversky questions AND (most importantly) he discusses how when the questions are reframed that peoples accuracy can dramatically swing from overwhelmingly wrong to overwhelmingly correct. I like this because the hardest thing in doing statistics (and much of science) is actu
> This metric is also a proxy for living in a violent environment. Probably, probably not. The probabilities of witnessing someone being shot is extremely low in both environments. If amount of people who are living in violent environment is much lower, it may be that a person who witnessed someone being shot is more probable from a good environment. link ▶ this video
This is the classic problem solved by Bayes: ▶ this video there just aren't that many homeschooled people to provide a defense. I'm another successful homeschooled-until-college adult, but homeschooling isn't that common now and it was even less popular when I was growing up. EDIT: unless you were mentioning defense of homeschooling given they were homeschooled. I would assume most people on HN who were homeschooled had a decent education/homeschooling experience.
Wow that's cool. I've always wondered how to do something those swish YouTube videos like 3Blue1Brown[1]. [1] ▶ this video
There's a very cool 3Blue1Brown video [0] that helps give you an intuitive feel for Bayes Theorem. [0] ▶ this video