Pachelbel Rant

I like the live version of that better[1], and while the Axis of Awesome wins in the shear number of songs, I like Rob P's presentation[2] of the same idea more. 1: link 2: ▶ this video

There was a relevant and entertaining stand-up bit about this: ▶ this video This might partly be why people love the music they heard as teens first. I hear a lot of stuff now that just seems like riffs on stuff I’ve heard before. I don’t have the nostalgia of first being exposed to it in my formative years to carry me through.

Yes, after all I-IV-V is the most common chord progression. It would have been nice if the author also had analyzed chord progressions instead of single chords. Who knows how many Pachelbel's progressions he would have found! :) ▶ this video

Which I guess means I have to leave the obligatory ▶ this video (Rob Paravonian's Pachelbel's Rant). :(

Which is itself meta-interesting, as it is a "style of joke" done by others (and a far as I'm concerned, often better), such as Rob Paravonian. ▶ this video

> "It's sort of convincingly improvisatory." I'm not sure if it was the dynamics specifically, but it was clear to me that A was human. Within 30 seconds I was so sure, I hit pause and loaded the answer to see if I was right (I was, and I'm likely the worst pianist on these forums and only a casual fan of music that falls into the 'classical' genre.) Here's[0] a fabulous physics paper that analyses the 16th notes by a studio drummer widely considered one of the best in his field. IIRC, the paper mentions he couldn't record with a click because it'd throw him off. That being said, the quality of the recording didn't suffer (his 2nd take of the track was more than good enough for the rest of the musicians to record against). So his own 'internal metronome' was more than good enough. The interesting thing wasn't that his syncopation was incompatible with a click track, but rather the skew which evolved throughout each phrase had a mathematical model that fit well against it. The study compared his recording against a corpus of user submissions of the same track and all of these drummers universally followed a similar set of dynamics. So presumably all humans (or at least, all western drummers who elected to submit their recordings) have that same skew intrinsically. It's interesting whether it's a byproduct of culture (like an accent) or a feature intrinsic to humans. In fact, that itself would be an interesting study -- compare the patterns of a traditionally schooled western j

One problem is that you can't stop hearing it, after you know. Like Pachelbel Canon [1]. Like orange and blue scenes and posters [2] [3]. [1] ▶ this video [2] link [3] link

It seems that the structure is already defined as standard pop/rock verse,verse,chorus,verse etc. And I guess it will result in people gravitating towards popular chords progression and melody. So at the end it won't be noise but a perfect Kate Perry/Shakira/Nickelback/campfire song like ▶ this video

That axis of awesome video reminds me of ▶ this video by Rob Paravonian. Also, the article reminds me of a parody video about the prolific nature of Bob Dylan: link

Related: ▶ this video - Rob Paravorian on how so many songs have the same chord sequence as Pachelbel's Canon in D