The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2022-2023
15.2M views · 4 years ago · explainer · evergreen
A Kurzgesagt animation on longtermism, arguing that because the future could hold trillions of people, our actions' effect on future generations may be what matters most.
HN uses it as a reference for the scale of future human population and long-term thinking.
3:33:35Daniel Schmachtenberger on The Portal (with host Eric Weinstein), Ep. #027 - On Avoiding Apocalypses
Eric Weinstein
389K views • 6 years ago
23:28Nick Bostrom - The Simulation Argument (Full)
Science, Technology & the Future
615K views • 13 years ago
11:32The Internet is Worse Than Ever – Now What?
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
9.1M views • 2 years ago
6:40Overpopulation – The Human Explosion Explained
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
14M views • 9 years ago
1:19:04How to Create a Mind | Ray Kurzweil | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
250K views • 13 years ago
1:02:04A.I., Mars and Immortality: Are We Dreaming Big Enough? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Interesting Times
1.3M views • 1 year ago
8:18Why Alien Life Would be our Doom - The Great Filter
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
27.9M views • 8 years ago
7:09A New History for Humanity – The Human Era
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
10.1M views • 9 years ago
6:48Why Age? Should We End Aging Forever?
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
9M views • 9 years ago
7:26Optimistic Nihilism
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
18.9M views • 9 years ago
18:33Is the world getting better or worse? A look at the numbers | Steven Pinker
TED
1.6M views • 8 years ago
19:46David Deutsch: Chemical scum that dream of distant quasars
TED
173K views • 19 years ago
7:15A Selfish Argument for Making the World a Better Place – Egoistic Altruism
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
11.4M views • 8 years ago
7:00David Deutsch on Optimism
Royal Society of Arts
46K views • 10 years ago
13:07Loneliness
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
28.1M views • 7 years ago
14:11We WILL Fix Climate Change!
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
12.3M views • 4 years ago
22:56We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads | Zeynep Tufekci
TED
771K views • 8 years ago
1:03:314.5 Billion Years in 1 Hour
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
17.9M views • 2 years ago
2:52:07Peter Thiel on "The Portal", Episode #001: "An Era of Stagnation & Universal Institutional Failure."
Eric Weinstein
1.2M views • 7 years ago
3:17:51Eliezer Yudkowsky: Dangers of AI and the End of Human Civilization | Lex Fridman Podcast #368
Lex Fridman
2.2M views • 3 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
A line in a Kurzgesagt video ( ▶ this video ) a while back caught my attention. “Every generation assumes they’re important enough to witness the apocalypse.” I don’t think that’s the only factor in people wishing for collapse, but I think it’s one of them.
It's survivorship bias—where bias means skewed from the full distribution of choices people and societies made, not bias as in discrimination. Most of the families and societies that didn't prioritize population growth (by reproduction or immigration) aren't around to advocate for that approach's merits, whereas those that did are. Fun fact: for each human alive today there've been 15 deceased humans ever. As zombie apocalypses go, 15:1 doesn't sound too bad. Kurzgesagt has some interesting videos on human population if that's your style: ▶ this video link
After seeing The last human - Kurzgesagt ▶ this video and realizing that for all Of human history we have though it was the end - and actually it’s more likely that as the first few billion humans we will be the source of fascination for many generations to come. Our digital record will be preserved and relentlessly studied. Maybe our thread here will be a footnote in a hologram in a few millennia.
Take a look at the recent Kurzgesagt video: ▶ this video If humanity plays its cards right, there will be trillions and trillions of humans living in the future, all over the galaxy. Everyone who lives right now, or has ever lived, is barely noticeable compared to that. Take a look at the recent Less Wrong post: link I don't see any flaws in this argument, we all are on a fast-track to getting killed by AI, and the smartest people on the planet don't have a plan on how to fix it. "Build an AI that burns all GPUs to prevent all the future AIs, and hopefully doesn't kill us all in the process" is the best idea they've got. If you believe that we're about to kill trillions and trillions of potential future human beings, these priorities make sense.