34C3 - Dude, you broke the Future!
media.ccc.de4 HN recommenders · recommended in 4 months, 2018-2024
42K views · 8 years ago · talk · evergreen
Charles Stross's 34C3 talk on how science fiction gets the future wrong. He argues that corporations are slow, human-powered AIs that optimize for profit, and that regulation lags behind accelerating technology.
HN returns to it whenever corporations as paperclip-maximizer AIs or AI risk come up.
6:16The Artificial Intelligence That Deleted A Century
Tom Scott
2M views • 7 years ago
15:27Why Not Just: Think of AGI Like a Corporation?
Robert Miles AI Safety
163K views • 7 years ago
3:33:35Daniel Schmachtenberger on The Portal (with host Eric Weinstein), Ep. #027 - On Avoiding Apocalypses
Eric Weinstein
389K views • 6 years ago
1:07:31The A.I. Dilemma - March 9, 2023
Center for Humane Technology
3.7M views • 3 years ago
1:02:1335C3 - The Ghost in the Machine
media.ccc.de
79K views • 7 years ago
37:52Algorithms are breaking how we think
Technology Connections
3M views • 1 year ago
1:57:02How We Prevent the AI’s from Killing us with Paul Christiano
Bankless
63K views • 3 years ago
1:02:04A.I., Mars and Immortality: Are We Dreaming Big Enough? | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Interesting Times
1.3M views • 1 year ago
22:56We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads | Zeynep Tufekci
TED
771K views • 8 years ago
14:28Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris
TED
3.9M views • 10 years ago
2:52:07Peter Thiel on "The Portal", Episode #001: "An Era of Stagnation & Universal Institutional Failure."
Eric Weinstein
1.2M views • 7 years ago
42:30Full interview: "Godfather of artificial intelligence" talks impact and potential of AI
CBS Mornings
2M views • 3 years ago
45:43DEF CON 31 - An Audacious Plan to Halt the Internet's Ensh*ttification - Cory Doctorow
DEFCONConference
303K views • 3 years ago
1:15:11Veritasium: What Everyone Gets Wrong About AI and Learning – Derek Muller Explains
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
5M views • 1 year ago
15:49I tried using AI. It scared me.
Tom Scott
8.5M views • 3 years ago
1:00:15Superintelligence: Science or Fiction? | Elon Musk & Other Great Minds
Future of Life Institute
664K views • 9 years ago
1:27:44Andrew Ng: Artificial Intelligence is the New Electricity
Stanford Graduate School of Business
524K views • 9 years ago
12:31The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
15.2M views • 4 years ago
3:17:51Eliezer Yudkowsky: Dangers of AI and the End of Human Civilization | Lex Fridman Podcast #368
Lex Fridman
2.2M views • 3 years ago
9:05Beware online "filter bubbles" | Eli Pariser
TED
1.7M views • 15 years ago
7 comments from Hacker News
Talk that introduced me to this idea of corporations as Paperclip Maximiser AI - "Dude you broke the Future" ▶ this video
Obligatory mention of Charles Stross' talk where he knits together exactly those two thoughts. "Dude, you broke the future": ▶ this video
> I don't think the author literally believe corporations are AGIs In the video questions section he confirms he means literal. ▶ this video Look at HN as an AI, you can ask a very complex question and get a very complex answer, it's AGI. 4chan can send humans out to do its real world physical bidding. It can literally get people shot. These are very complex AI's.
For another take on this corporations ≈ ai idea, I cannot recommend enough Charles Stross' 34C3 talk on this very topic. ▶ this video (picks up approx 10mins in).
This reminds me a lot of Charles Stross' talk at 34C3, where he described corporations and competition between them as "human-powered AIs" that maximize profit as their only goal, similar to how a neural network only blindly minimizes a loss function. ▶ this video
You could say the same about a credit card skimmer on an ATM. It's passive, right? It's just a sensor that sits there and absorbs people's data. I don't think this argument makes a lot of sense. The point is, there needs to be some law and order in place so that when people abuse this tech to harm people and society and get caught, there's some precedent to stop them and punish them. It doesn't matter if the technology is passive. The intent and action to use it to harm people are not passive and are not analogous to thought crime at all. There is dire need for regulation with a lot of emerging technologies right now. We're building systems with enormous power which can break human society if misused. I think the intangibility and "passivity" of this tech (or at least how it is perceived) gives us a very false sense of security. Like how a few decades ago very few average people could understand how the internet might have a great impact on society. Obviously they aren't thinking that way anymore. Check out Charles Stross's speech at C3 about regulatory lag relative to the the accelerated nature of tech growth: ▶ this video
Charles Stross read the text at the 34C3. If you want to listen to it rather than read it: [1]: ▶ this video [2]: link EDIT: Sorry, the read mode on mobile did not show the embedded video.