Hackers Testifying at the United States Senate, May 19, 1998 (L0pht Heavy Industries)
Joe GrandCited 6× on HN, 2015-2024
563K views · 15 years ago · other · evergreen
C-SPAN footage of the L0pht hacker collective testifying before the US Senate Governmental Affairs Committee on May 19, 1998. The members discuss internet and computer security weaknesses. The uploader says the media remembered only the claim that they could take down the internet in 30 minutes.
Cited as a historical reference when HN discusses L0pht, Mudge or Joe Grand, rather than recommended as a watch.
4:58:53BBS the Documentary [Full HD]
L33T GUY
92K views • 9 years ago
2:06Max Headroom WTTW Pirating Incident - 11/22/87 (Subtitled)
jonrev
9.3M views • 19 years ago
10:41Ralph Langner: Cracking Stuxnet, a 21st-century cyber weapon
TED
323K views • 15 years ago
44:19ARCHIVE TEAM: A Distributed Preservation of Service Attack
textfilesdotcom
29K views • 15 years ago
45:14DEF CON 19 - Artem Dinaburg - Bit-squatting: DNS Hijacking Without Exploitation
DEFCONConference
4K views • 13 years ago
28:35H2K2 (2002): "The Conscience of a Hacker"
Channel2600
21K views • 14 years ago
55:59DEF CON 18 - Jason Scott - You're Stealing It Wrong! 30 Years of Inter-Pirate Battles
DEFCONConference
60K views • 13 years ago
22:52F2C2012: Aaron Swartz keynote - "How we stopped SOPA"
F2C2012
500K views • 14 years ago
8:39:01Decentralized Web Summit - Live From The Internet Archive
Internet Archive
17K views • 10 years ago
56:09Project Code Rush - The Beginnings of Netscape / Mozilla Documentary
The Documentary Network
337K views • 13 years ago
32:18How I hacked a hardware crypto wallet and recovered $2 million
Joe Grand
10M views • 4 years ago
53:00The Internet Was Weeks Away From Disaster And No One Knew
Veritasium
16.4M views • 8 months ago
45:14DEFCON 19: Bit-squatting: DNS Hijacking Without Exploitation (w speaker)
Christiaan008
24K views • 14 years ago
48:52DEFCON 20: Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The National Security Agency and the Constitution
Christiaan008
10K views • 13 years ago
13:40Free software, free society: Richard Stallman at TEDxGeneva 2014
TEDx Talks
487K views • 12 years ago
29:37The Really Dark Truth About Bots
Benn Jordan
947K views • 1 year ago
48:40Capt. Grace Hopper on Future Possibilities: Data, Hardware, Software, and People (Part One, 1982)
National Security Agency
179K views • 2 years ago
49:36Joe Armstrong - Keynote: The Forgotten Ideas in Computer Science - Code BEAM SF 2018
Code Sync
40K views • 8 years ago
1:28:09Jacob Appelbaum (Part 2/2) Digital Anti-Repression Workshop - April 26 2012
NewYorkRawVideos
19K views • 14 years ago
50:59DEF CON 22 - Adrian Crenshaw- Dropping Docs on Darknets: How People Got Caught
DEFCONConference
219K views • 11 years ago
6 comments from Hacker News
OK, I am pretty sick of this, so excuse me for blogging a post, but decades of this crap is getting to me: Ok some bad actors abuse your bad crappy gear to pwn & spy, but you, Cisco, help your government spy on everyone, including allies, I would call this karma, but the scale you are aiding and abetting the US Gov do it on does not even compare. Frankly, nobody should be using any closed source networking gear, packet switching infrastructure has become way to important to rely on $corp and $bs sales line they are pushing. I get that you, Cisco, hav nobody to talk to about how you are being abused to aid your own government, that is how National Security Letters work: * Some alphabet soup picks up a phone to the domestic espionage part of the FBI wanting something not legal as of then. * FBI prepares another production of the dog & pony rubberstamp show trial known as FISA. * A whole charade is put on * and in the end the applicant gets to write a letter dictating that $us_company, must do $whatever the heck they want. * Include a gag order * and a friendly threat of getting charged under the Espionage Act (which essentially means you are convicted; the trial is a formality as just about any evidence is inadmissible, on national security grounds, of course.). * Somehow not see the obviously parallel to a circle jerk * Simultaneously confusing me on how that is different from say. China's way of doing things, except more shady and secretive. Cisco, Microsoft and Juniper shoul
In Mr. Zatko's previous appearance before Congress* in 1998, he was addressed by his hacker nom-de-plume, Mudge. Perhaps they see fit to continue this practice. * ▶ this video
Joe Grand (aka "Kingpin") is the real deal. If anyone is not aware, Joe is one of the original members of the famous L0pht hacker group from the 90s [1], and testified in the historical US Senate hearing in 1998 [2][3] (as the youngest member, with just 22 at the time). Besides being a brilliant electric engineer, he's also a great storyteller. Worth checking some of his other reverse engineering videos on YT. [1] link [2] link [3] ▶ this video
They testified in front of the U.S. Senate in 1998. That's more than a footnote might do, in my opinion. ▶ this video
The reason behind 'the Web' resembling the mess unfortunately best exemplified by 'the Net' has a much simpler and trivial reason: We have globally networked local Networks of locally networkable Networks and most of us naively think that this Global Network of Local Networks networking Local Networks actually functions as a universally internetworking Internetwork of universally internetworkable Internetworks internetworking internetworkable Internetworks internetworking internetworkable Networks[([¹]1)], because we trust the people who've labeled both IPv4 and IPv6 as the "Internet Protocol" despite it not in any way, shape or form having the ability to perform what the people who came up with the concept of internetworking (no, NOT the ARPA people.) actually meant by the term.[2] As the simplest proof of this fact: We've almost reached 2020 and all of our 'solutions' for multi homing don't ACTUALLY work in a not-pants-on-head-dysfunctional despite the fact that we've faced that issue since, to quote Wikipedia, "In 1972, Tinker Air Force Base wanted connections to two different IMPs for redundancy. ARPANET designers realized that they couldn't support this feature because host addresses were the addresses of the IMP port number the host was connected to (borrowing from telephony)." Our 'Inter'net at the moment still resembles just a global network, aka just plain old phone calls, with extra steps. Which explains both the mess we call the WWW, and the global dominance of lar
Yeah, that's an amazing image. I thought it must be doctored... but in the intro to the recording of their testimony, the person speaking ("chairman"?) says: "Due to the sensitivity of the work done at the L0pht they'll be using their hacker names of Mudge, Weld, Brian Oblivion, Kingpin, Space Rogue, Tan, and Stefan." ▶ this video