HackerTube
HomeLongsLikedHistoryWatch laterCategoriesPlaylistsSettings

There’s No Wave Function? | Jacob Barandes

Curt Jaimungal2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2024-2026
YouTube
488K views · 1 year ago · interview · evergreen

Physicist Jacob Barandes discusses his view that quantum mechanics can be formulated without wave functions, using a stochastic, probabilistic approach. The long interview covers measurement, the foundations of quantum theory and the history of the field.

HN commenters point to it as a credible, clearly explained alternative take on quantum foundations from a Harvard physicist.

Quantum physics#wavefunction#measurementproblem#stochasticquantummechanics#jacobbarandes#interpretationsofquantummechanics

3 comments from Hacker News

@phkahler2026 · in “Is Particle Physics Dead, Dying, or Just Hard?”

I'm convinced there are some semi-classical explanations that just haven't been figured out. Electrons are helically moving photons: link That's some interesting/wacky stuff, but there has been more research to improve those calculations - like deriving the electron charge and magnetic moment. Personally I like the idea that a proton is somehow literally an electron and 3 up quarks (a neutron gets 2 electrons and 3 up quarks). I am not a physicist though, so I'm sure there are reasons they "know" this is not the case. I find it fascinating that some physicists say wave functions are somehow "real" and then we've got Jacob Barandes saying you don't even need wave functions to do the computations of QM: ▶ this video IMHO there is a lot of exploration to be done without particle accelerators.

CitesView on HN
@ilitirit2025 · in “Quantum Mechanics, Concise Book”

I would recommend watching Curt Jaimungal's series of talks with Jacob Barandes. He gives a nice background history of various aspects of QM, including the formulation of Matrix and Wave mechanics (and loads of other ideas). Barandes is excellent at clearly articulating complex ideas in very simple, concise terms. He also has his own formulation of QM based on "Indivisible non-Markovian Stochastic Processes". Even if you disagree with his ideas, the interviews are quite fascinating. In this interview he goes over pretty much exactly what you mentioned (and a lot more): ▶ this video

Strongly recommendsView on HN
@slowmovintarget2024 · in “The Google Willow Thing”

Jacob Barandes is a professor of physics at Harvard (not a crank). He recently did a great podcast with Kurt Jaimungal [1]. In the interview he explains that every year he searches for a good way to introduce his students to quantum mechanics, and every year he's ended up being unsatisfied with the approach and started again. One year he decided to attempt describing systems with traditional mechanics, using probabilities (stochastic mechanics). He worked at it and worked at it, assuming that he would eventually have to take some leap to cross the chasm into the world of gauge theory, Lie Groups, and Hilbert spaces. What he found is, to his surprise, the math just seemed to fit together at some point. That is, he found a mapping, just as the path integral is a mapping into the math of the wave function, and it just kind of worked. He had been under the assumption that it shouldn't. It turns out, that in doing his stochastic mechanics, he had used mathematical descriptions that were indivisible. That is once a given process began, it could not be sliced into smaller and smaller time slices. It had to complete and yield a result. This was what he called a non-Markov stochastic process. Apparently all previous attempts at this used Markov processes, which are divisible like Hilbert vector calculations or the path integral. It turns out that things like "collapse" of the wave function, and all the quantum weirdness arose from how the math worked with the wave function and Hilbert

RecommendsView on HN
David Deutsch on Physics Without Probability1:06:21

David Deutsch on Physics Without Probability

Simon Benjamin
38K views • 11 years ago
Lecture 1 | The Theoretical Minimum1:46:33

Lecture 1 | The Theoretical Minimum

Stanford
969K views • 14 years ago
Do we have to accept Quantum weirdness? De Broglie Bohm Pilot Wave Theory explained12:00

Do we have to accept Quantum weirdness? De Broglie Bohm Pilot Wave Theory explained

Looking Glass Universe
125K views • 9 years ago
Pilot Wave Theory and Quantum Realism | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios16:32

Pilot Wave Theory and Quantum Realism | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios

PBS Space Time
1.9M views • 9 years ago
Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong1:00:18

Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong

The Royal Institution
6.9M views • 9 years ago
Particles, Fields and The Future of Physics - A Lecture by Sean Carroll1:37:55

Particles, Fields and The Future of Physics - A Lecture by Sean Carroll

Fermilab
1.8M views • 13 years ago
Some light quantum mechanics (with minutephysics)22:22

Some light quantum mechanics (with minutephysics)

3Blue1Brown
2.2M views • 9 years ago
A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll56:11

A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll

The Royal Institution
4.7M views • 6 years ago
The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know1:03:43

The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know

Google TechTalks
1.8M views • 15 years ago
Why Parallel Universes Are Probably Real20:00

Why Parallel Universes Are Probably Real

Veritasium
25.4M views • 6 years ago
The more general uncertainty principle, regarding Fourier transforms18:07

The more general uncertainty principle, regarding Fourier transforms

3Blue1Brown
2.3M views • 8 years ago
Visualization of Quantum Physics (Quantum Mechanics)14:34

Visualization of Quantum Physics (Quantum Mechanics)

udiprod
2.8M views • 9 years ago
Entanglement and Complexity: Gravity and Quantum Mechanics1:14:25

Entanglement and Complexity: Gravity and Quantum Mechanics

Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics
370K views • 11 years ago
Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox17:35

Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox

minutephysics
8.1M views • 9 years ago
Physics in Clojure - Colin Smith40:19

Physics in Clojure - Colin Smith

ClojureTV
13K views • 9 years ago
Do Complex Numbers Exist?11:26

Do Complex Numbers Exist?

Sabine Hossenfelder
854K views • 5 years ago
Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance9:16

Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance

Veritasium
4.5M views • 11 years ago
The Original Double Slit Experiment7:40

The Original Double Slit Experiment

Veritasium
10.2M views • 13 years ago
Turning Waves Into Particles45:55

Turning Waves Into Particles

Huygens Optics
194K views • 1 year ago
Is This What Quantum Mechanics Looks Like?7:41

Is This What Quantum Mechanics Looks Like?

Veritasium
6.2M views • 10 years ago