Some light quantum mechanics (with minutephysics)
3Blue1Brown2 HN recommenders · recommended in 1 month, 2020-2022
2.2M views · 9 years ago · explainer · evergreen
3Blue1Brown, in collaboration with minutephysics, introduces the math of superposition and quantum states using polarized light. It builds up the quantum behavior of photons as a simple counting and probability problem.
Recommended as an approachable way to understand the quantum nature of light and basic quantum math without heavy machinery.
17:35Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox
minutephysics
8.1M views • 9 years ago
52:04Lecture by Douglas Hofstadter: Albert Einstein on Light; Light on Albert Einstein
Uppsala universitet
23K views • 8 years ago
9:16Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance
Veritasium
4.5M views • 11 years ago
14:34Visualization of Quantum Physics (Quantum Mechanics)
udiprod
2.8M views • 9 years ago
1:46:33Lecture 1 | The Theoretical Minimum
Stanford
969K views • 14 years ago
11:26Do Complex Numbers Exist?
Sabine Hossenfelder
854K views • 5 years ago
56:11A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
The Royal Institution
4.7M views • 6 years ago
1:28:23Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists
Microsoft Research
2.2M views • 8 years ago
2:14:31There’s No Wave Function? | Jacob Barandes
Curt Jaimungal
488K views • 1 year ago
45:55Turning Waves Into Particles
Huygens Optics
194K views • 1 year ago
15:53Quantum Field Theory visualized
ScienceClic English
2.7M views • 6 years ago
1:00:18Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong
The Royal Institution
6.9M views • 9 years ago
1:03:43The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Know
Google TechTalks
1.8M views • 15 years ago
17:31How Quantum Computers Break Encryption | Shor's Algorithm Explained
minutephysics
3.4M views • 7 years ago
20:34How big is a visible photon?
Huygens Optics
793K views • 5 years ago
1:14:25Entanglement and Complexity: Gravity and Quantum Mechanics
Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics
370K views • 11 years ago
12:00Do we have to accept Quantum weirdness? De Broglie Bohm Pilot Wave Theory explained
Looking Glass Universe
125K views • 9 years ago
14:03Quantum Entanglement and the Great Bohr-Einstein Debate | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios
PBS Space Time
2.6M views • 10 years ago
18:07The more general uncertainty principle, regarding Fourier transforms
3Blue1Brown
2.3M views • 8 years ago
7:40The Original Double Slit Experiment
Veritasium
10.2M views • 13 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
What you are describing is a "hidden variable" theory. They are disproved by the experiments of the Bell's inequality. It's more weird, much more weird. Let's continue with your experiment about the pair of red or green socks. If you and your friend measure if they are red-or-green, both will get the same results. This can be explained with a classical theory. Nobody disagree with that. The weird part is that you can measure if they are 50%red and 50%green! Can I call it yellow? This makes no sense with classical socks and colors, but it makes sense for quantum particles and other properties. But there are two ways to combine 50%red and 50%green, the technical notation is (R+G)/sqrt(2) and (R-G)/sqrt(2), one with a plus and one with a minus. Can I call them good-yellow and bad-yellow? Or you prefer yellow and blue? In one of the experiments, red means vertical and green horizontal, so one of the combinations is a 45° diagonal like this / and the other is a 45° diagonal like this \. You don't need fancy equipment to measure the combinations, it's just a polarizer rotated 45°. Can I call them yellow and backyelow? I prefer good-yellow and bad-yellow because it's more clear that something weird is happening. If you measure red-or-green and your friends measures good-yellow-or-bad-yellow, then the results will not be correlated. If you got "red", your friend has a 50% probability of getting good-yellow and a 50% probability of getting bad-yellow. There is nothing to explain here.
> I have a lot of trouble imagining any experiment which could completely rule out every other influencing factor It's called Bell's theorem and it can even be tested at home[4]. There are no local hidden variables in quantum mechanics.[1][2][3] 1. link 2. link 3. link 4a. link 4b. ▶ this video
I found these two videos very helpful in understanding the quantum nature of light after being stuck in the same spot: link ▶ this video (Watch those in order, because they're a collaboration between two YouTubers)
Minute Physics and 3brown1blue did a two part collab that simplifies some of it down to a counting problem that'd be suitable for grade school. link ▶ this video