DEF CON 18 - Moxie Marlinspike - Changing Threats To Privacy: From TIA to Google
DEFCONConference3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2017-2022
7K views · 13 years ago · talk · evergreen
Moxie Marlinspike's DEF CON 18 talk argues that privacy threats have shifted from centralized state databases like TIA to corporate data collection by companies like Google, despite wins in strong cryptography and decentralization.
Strongly recommended as a formative talk on privacy, especially for its argument that voting with your feet fails as a privacy strategy.
42:50Defcon 18 Changing threats to privacy Moxie Marlinspike Part
killab66661
22K views • 15 years ago
46:22DEF CON 19 - Moxie Marlinspike - SSL And The Future Of Authenticity
DEFCONConference
11K views • 13 years ago
31:46Moxie Marlinspike, Next Generation Threats 2014
Techworld Sverige
30K views • 11 years ago
48:52DEFCON 20: Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The National Security Agency and the Constitution
Christiaan008
10K views • 13 years ago
52:51DEF CON 22 - Zoz - Don't Fuck It Up!
DEFCONConference
546K views • 11 years ago
40:47DEFCON 19: Steal Everything, Kill Everyone, Cause Total Financial Ruin! (w speaker)
Christiaan008
1.7M views • 14 years ago
50:59DEF CON 22 - Adrian Crenshaw- Dropping Docs on Darknets: How People Got Caught
DEFCONConference
219K views • 11 years ago
48:02BlackHat USA 2011: SSL And The Future Of Authenticity
Christiaan008
95K views • 15 years ago
24:28Ichthyology: Phishing as a Science
Black Hat
38K views • 9 years ago
1:14:35The Johns Hopkins Foreign Affairs Symposium Presents: The Price of Privacy: Re-Evaluating the NSA
Johns Hopkins University
53K views • 12 years ago
38:49DEF CON 23 - Chris Domas - Repsych: Psychological Warfare in Reverse Engineering
DEFCONConference
173K views • 10 years ago
52:33Defcon 18 - Practical Cellphone Spying - Chris Paget - Part.mov
killab66661
217K views • 15 years ago
50:56DEFCON 20: Hacker + Airplanes = No Good Can Come Of This
Christiaan008
226K views • 13 years ago
54:35Cybersecurity as Realpolitik by Dan Geer presented at Black Hat USA 2014
Black Hat
65K views • 12 years ago
1:03:42re:publica 2012 - Eben Moglen - Freedom of Thought Requires Free Media
re:publica
44K views • 14 years ago
18:40DEF CON 17 - Deviant Ollam - Packing and the Friendly Skies
DEFCONConference
88K views • 12 years ago
1:03:14re:publica 2015 - Aral Balkan: Beyond The Camera Panopticon
re:publica
21K views • 11 years ago
12:32Protecting Privacy with MATH (Collab with the Census)
minutephysics
451K views • 7 years ago
43:0336C3 - The ecosystem is moving
media.ccc.de
2K views • 6 years ago
1:22:4029C3 Panel: Jesselyn Radack, Thomas Drake, William Binney on whistleblowing and surveillance
thisdayinwikileaks
35K views • 13 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
I am (or was?) a huge Moxie Marlinspike fan, and highly recommend this video[0] of his from Defcon several years ago. It was formative in my understanding of privacy and security. That said, something here really doesn't add up. Being a huge fan, I took note several years ago of MobileCoin, a cryptocurrency, which listed him on the home page as one of the team.[1] Or, see this Wired article about it[2]. The big selling point, as I remember it, of MobileCoin (per the name) was that it was actually feasible for small clients (i.e. phones) to meaningfully take part in the network. But he's since been scrubbed from the site, as far as I can tell. MobileCoin was added to Signal, much to the chagrin of HN. And Signal is intimately related to Moxie's work. I had thought that if MobileCoin becomes a thing, then the holders of the originally mined coin would become pretty rich, and I assume that would include Moxie. So I'm a little confused by how this post fits in. I infer from it that he's new to web3 and crypto in general, but it feels like this isn't the case. (Though "web3" is ambiguous, and I suppose he's referring generally to Ethereum and dApps.) But his main point seems to be that the dominant cryptocurrency isn't suitable for involving light clients, which was the main selling point of MobileCoin. I just wish it were clear his involvement with MobileCoin, since it feels to me like that could be a pretty significant conflict of interest with regard to Ethereum investigated he
Moxie Marlinespike (Openwhisper Systems, Signal) makes a good argument for why that doesn't work ▶ this video . Recommend watching the whole talk.
Four years ago, Moxie Marlinspike offered a good explanation of why this "vote with your feet" approach doesn't really work, at DEFCON 18. His talk is called "Changing Threats to Privacy" and I highly recommend watching it: ▶ this video If you're impatient, you can skip the first 10 minutes and 40 seconds: ▶ this video