Protecting Privacy with MATH (Collab with the Census)
minutephysics2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020-2022
451K views · 7 years ago · explainer · evergreen
minutephysics, in collaboration with the US Census Bureau, explains differential privacy and why the 2020 census adds noise to protect individuals' data. It walks through how statistics can leak private information.
Linked as the clearest technical explainer of differential privacy and the census, and of why aggregate data can still compromise privacy.
11:01The Power of Big Data and Psychographics | 2016 Concordia Annual Summit
Concordia
733K views • 10 years ago
42:50DEF CON 18 - Moxie Marlinspike - Changing Threats To Privacy: From TIA to Google
DEFCONConference
7K views • 13 years ago
18:16Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?
Stand-up Maths
906K views • 5 years ago
26:14Data | Philosophy Tube
Philosophy Tube
876K views • 6 years ago
8:34Was YOUR vote counted? (feat. homomorphic encryption) - Numberphile
Numberphile
198K views • 10 years ago
1:03:14re:publica 2015 - Aral Balkan: Beyond The Camera Panopticon
re:publica
21K views • 11 years ago
28:11Ben Kreuter RWC 2017
Real World Crypto
1K views • 9 years ago
5:31The hidden background noise that can catch criminals
Tom Scott
5.8M views • 4 years ago
19:55Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION?
Stand-up Maths
1.3M views • 5 years ago
3:59The Lava Lamps That Help Keep The Internet Secure
Tom Scott
4.3M views • 9 years ago
35:49Breaking The Creepy AI in Police Cameras
Benn Jordan
3.8M views • 1 year ago
1:23:56Stanford Seminar - Unethical Algorithms of Massive Scale
Stanford Online
15K views • 9 years ago
17:46Why do Biden's votes not follow Benford's Law?
Stand-up Maths
3.7M views • 5 years ago
24:28Ichthyology: Phishing as a Science
Black Hat
38K views • 9 years ago
12:56How China Tracks Everyone
VICE News
4.5M views • 6 years ago
54:3528c3: The coming war on general computation
28c3
267K views • 14 years ago
1:14:35The Johns Hopkins Foreign Affairs Symposium Presents: The Price of Privacy: Re-Evaluating the NSA
Johns Hopkins University
53K views • 12 years ago
1:03:07Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010
London Mathematical Society
601K views • 12 years ago
8:42Google’s The Selfish Ledger (leaked internal video)
intermission
577K views • 8 years ago
2:29Amazing mind reader reveals his 'gift'
Duval Guillaume
15M views • 14 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
Technical explanation by minutephysics: ▶ this video The amount of privacy is configurable, and researchers who would like to tune it (in either direction) can make a plea so the public can decide the amount of privacy loss they're willing give up in order to aid research. Each culture is different and has different tolerances for privacy and amount of intrusiveness.
Your comment reminded me of this minutephysics video about the census. ▶ this video It a great walkthrough of the "privacy doom principle."
> That would make the existence of anonymous data practically speaking impossible to have on the web For almost every type of data that is true. Transforming or substituting data doesn't make it anonymous; the patters in the data are still present. To produce actually anonymous data you have to do what the GDPR instructed: corrupt the data ("rendered anonymous") severely enough that the "data subject is ... no longer identifiable". You need to do something like aggregate the data into a small number of groups such that individual records no longer exist. Techniques like "differential privacy" let you control precisely how "anonymous" your data is by e.g. mixing in carefully crafted noise. > 8192 bucket While others have pointed out that this isn't actually limited to 13 bits of entropy for most people, there are at least two reasons that field is still very personally identifying. First, "x-client-data on its own" never happens. Google isn't wasting time and money implementing this feature to make an isolated database with a single column. At no point will the x-client-data value (or any other type of data they capture) ever sit in isolation. I used the IPv4 Source Address as an example because it will necessarily be present in the header of the packets that transport the x-client-data header over the internet. Suggesting that Google would ever use this value in isolation is almost insulting to Google; why would they waste their expensive developer time to create, capture, an