Stanford Seminar - Generalized Reversible Computing and the Unconventional Computing Landscape
Stanford Online2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020-2021
16K views · 9 years ago · lecture · evergreen
A Stanford EE380 seminar by Michael P. Frank of Sandia National Laboratories on generalized reversible computing. It surveys unconventional computing approaches as transistor scaling nears its limits and energy efficiency stops improving.
HN commenters cite it as an informative talk from a leading researcher in reversible computing, mainly in threads on reversible computers and energy efficiency.
14:46Robust-first computing: Beyond efficiency
Dave Ackley
8K views • 13 years ago
1:26:02Stanford Seminar - The Soul of a New Machine: Rethinking the Computer
Stanford Online
76K views • 6 years ago
1:04:53Jim Keller: Moore’s Law is Not Dead
UC Berkeley EECS
77K views • 7 years ago
46:36Sophie Wilson - The Future of Microprocessors
Erlang Solutions
57K views • 9 years ago
40:13"Programming a 144-computer chip to minimize power" - Chuck Moore (2013)
Strange Loop Conference
19K views • 5 years ago
56:54Change w/ Jim Keller
Tenstorrent
61K views • 3 years ago
21:42Future Computers Will Be Radically Different (Analog Computing)
Veritasium
13.2M views • 4 years ago
1:34:44Jim Keller: Moore's Law, Microprocessors, and First Principles | Lex Fridman Podcast #70
Lex Fridman
742K views • 6 years ago
1:19:38John Hennessy and David Patterson 2017 ACM A.M. Turing Award Lecture
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
150K views • 8 years ago
1:31:28Stanford Seminar: Beyond Floating Point: Next Generation Computer Arithmetic
Stanford Online
33K views • 9 years ago
1:00:34Chuck Moore's Fireside Chat 2011
GreenArraysInc
6K views • 14 years ago
1:37:12[7] Jim Keller, Silicon Wizard 🧙♂️
TechTechPotato
67K views • 5 years ago
20:13The Most Powerful Computers You've Never Heard Of
Veritasium
13.7M views • 4 years ago
1:10:58Trends in Deep Learning Hardware: Bill Dally (NVIDIA)
Paul G. Allen School
32K views • 2 years ago
26:02Moore's Law is Not Dead (Jim Keller) | AI Podcast Clips
Lex Fridman
172K views • 6 years ago
21:52英特尔Lunar Lake深度评测:轻薄本有救了!
极客湾Geekerwan
198K views • 2 years ago
1:21:07David Patterson - A New Golden Age for Computer Architecture: History, Challenges and Opportunities
UBC Computer Science
99K views • 7 years ago
2:55:13Oral History of Gary Davidian, part 2 of 2
Computer History Museum
2K views • 7 years ago
15:03Living Computation: Robust-first programming in ULAM
Dave Ackley
4K views • 11 years ago
2:39:15Jim Keller: The Future of Computing, AI, Life, and Consciousness | Lex Fridman Podcast #162
Lex Fridman
1.3M views • 5 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
According to [Michael Frank's video]( ▶ this video ), there is an architectural overhead of ~500x that people can not get over (IIUC, this overhead only applies for gate based computing models). A reasonable gap between state-of-the-art gate based computing models and Landauer's limit should be 10^2-10^3. On the other side, reversible computing in general has 2-16 times computational overhead at the software level from my using experience. To save energy, reversible computing has to be at least ~10x more energy efficient at the instruction level.
For anyone interested in the topic I highly recommend checking out Dr. Michael P. Frank's work. This video is good one to start with ▶ this video
I think Michael P Frank is one of the more knowledgable people working on the subject, his Stanford talk is extremely informative ... ▶ this video