The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste
Cleo AbramCited 3× on HN, 2023-2025
4.8M views · 3 years ago · explainer · evergreen
Cleo Abram's explainer on whether nuclear waste is really the intractable problem it is portrayed as, looking at how spent fuel can be recycled and used. It features a collaboration with Johnny Harris.
HN cites it in nuclear power debates for the point that recycling waste is largely a solved problem, though costly to build.
40:40Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?
Google TechTalks
75K views • 15 years ago
18:14We Solved Nuclear Waste Decades Ago
Kyle Hill
4.5M views • 4 years ago
35:50Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
22:47Is Nuclear Energy Green?
Sabine Hossenfelder
1M views • 4 years ago
17:33Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia
TEDx Talks
5.7M views • 7 years ago
1:11:06Something's Rotten with French Nuclear
Decouple Media
12K views • 4 years ago
29:33Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates
TED
4.7M views • 16 years ago
18:17Nuclear Waste: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
12.3M views • 9 years ago
20:29Why I changed my mind about nuclear power | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxBerlin
TEDx Talks
2.3M views • 8 years ago
16:11The Economics of Nuclear Energy
Real Engineering
2M views • 6 years ago
15:42Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040
Improbable Matter
2M views • 5 years ago
23:10Economics of Nuclear Reactor
Illinois EnergyProf
921K views • 7 years ago
3:19:02Q&A - Helion Energy, NIF, Space and more
Improbable Matter
151K views • 3 years ago
18:58The Great Stranding: How Inaccurate Mainstream LCOE Estimates are Creating a Trillion-Dollar Bubble
RethinkX
38K views • 5 years ago
1:59:59Thorium: An energy solution - THORIUM REMIX 2011
gordonmcdowell
804K views • 15 years ago
18:01California's Renewable Energy Problem
Real Engineering
1.6M views • 7 years ago
1:32:00You are being misled about renewable energy technology.
Technology Connections
5M views • 9 months ago
22:24Plastics: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
4.6M views • 5 years ago
6:09These tunnels are designed for 100,000 years
Tom Scott
4.3M views • 7 years ago
7:17The problems with Helion Energy - a response to Real Engineering
Improbable Matter
912K views • 3 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
The annoying thing is recycling nuclear waste is kind of a solved problem. I've watched this video a while ago but iirc it is just more expensive to build a reactor that can also recycle its own waste. ▶ this video
How well do solar and wind infrastructures handle tornados and hurricanes? Also, consistent wind resources are notably absent in the South/Southeast. There are no Hoover Dam-like sites available there. Do you honestly expect to tell tens of millions of people that they should just be content with a single hurricane knocking out their electricity grid for a month? That's not realistic. You cannot plan an electrical future on the hope that the weather is always pleasant and consistent. This is one of the reasons why fossil fuel dominance continues in those regions. Go ahead and draw a map of those places where hurricanes and tornados are most prevalent and their large scale adoption of solar and wind. They're not stupid. They're not just political. There are real concerns you are handwaving away because you (likely) like in a region that does not have these same concerns. What works for California will not work for Georgia, Florida, or Nebraska as-is. Baseball-size hail destroys huge solar arrays let alone softball-size [0]. Nuclear plants laugh at hail and would handle and have(!) weathered tornados and hurricanes just fine. Check the numbers. Even accounting for nuclear disasters outside the US like Chernobyl and Fukushima, the number of deaths attributed to nuclear power per unit of electricity is lower than any fossil fuel, lower than wind, and about equal to solar. Just imagine if we put the same R&D force behind nuclear that we've done for solar. You think solar's cheap?
It’s a great milestone to establish a complete & safe lifecycle for nuclear fuel. From what I understood of current technology, recycling used nuclear fuel is too expensive and impractical today, so it makes economic sense to invest in long-term waste storage. But I do wonder if in 30-50 years, the main way to deal with nuclear waste would be recycling. I saw an interesting interview of experts about this last month: ▶ this video