Innovating to zero! | Bill Gates
TED1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2011-2025
4.7M views · 16 years ago · talk · dated
Bill Gates' TED2010 talk on the energy future, arguing for zero global carbon emissions by 2050 and the need for energy miracles. He explains why he is backing a different type of nuclear reactor.
HN mostly cites it in nuclear power debates as Gates making the case that nuclear is needed for clean energy, with a few critical references to his views on population.
36:12Energy Investments Dialogue | Bill Gates | Global Energy Forum
Stanford ENERGY
288K views • 7 years ago
17:33Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia
TEDx Talks
5.7M views • 7 years ago
20:29Why I changed my mind about nuclear power | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxBerlin
TEDx Talks
2.3M views • 8 years ago
22:47Is Nuclear Energy Green?
Sabine Hossenfelder
1M views • 4 years ago
1:11:06Something's Rotten with French Nuclear
Decouple Media
12K views • 4 years ago
1:49:32Jancovici : Will technology save us from Climate Change ? MIT Media Lab - 23/02/2021
Jean-Marc Jancovici
84K views • 5 years ago
13:04The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste
Cleo Abram
4.8M views • 3 years ago
35:50Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
1:32:44Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...
Google TechTalks
74K views • 19 years ago
15:42Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040
Improbable Matter
2M views • 5 years ago
1:03:31How to Enjoy the End of the World
Sid Smith
167K views • 7 years ago
19:59The Future of Humanity's Energy No One Knows About | Terraform
S3 | Science, Startups, & Stories
228K views • 2 years ago
18:35A reality check on renewables - David MacKay
TED-Ed
986K views • 13 years ago
16:11The Economics of Nuclear Energy
Real Engineering
2M views • 6 years ago
11:34Elon Musk's Unbelievably Simple 12-minute Killer Break Down on Climate Change
yonseienglish
2.9M views • 10 years ago
18:58The Great Stranding: How Inaccurate Mainstream LCOE Estimates are Creating a Trillion-Dollar Bubble
RethinkX
38K views • 5 years ago
3:51Carbon Capture Isn't Real
Adam Something
988K views • 4 years ago
18:17Nuclear Waste: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
LastWeekTonight
12.3M views • 9 years ago
13:59The Contradictions of Battery Operated Vehicles | Graham Conway | TEDxSanAntonio
TEDx Talks
4.1M views • 6 years ago
2:32:291 - L'énergie - Cours des Mines 2019 - Jancovici - [EN subtitles available]
Jean-Marc Jancovici
1.1M views • 7 years ago
5 comments from Hacker News
Sorry, I didn’t double check indeed. I posted the wrong TED talk from him, see [1] at 4:21. There he says we need to limit climate change by limiting population growth. I think this is quite a hypocritical stance from someone who flies private jet all year. [1]: ▶ this video
Your comment loses it's value when you're trying to poke all the holes. > Storage is also plunging in cost, and additional technologies are already in commercial use (iron flow, for example.) > HVDC transmission is spreading, with higher capacity, lower cost, and higher efficiency for moving electricity greater distances (in other words, it's less of a deal if it's really windy in one spot and not in another, and ideally-suited wind sites can be further from where electricity is needed.) How do you transform DC up and down? By converting it to AC. Running it through a transformer and converting it back, HVDC isn't gonna take over the world, certain stretches might be HVDC where beneficial but not all over the world. The difference with nuclear is that anyone can build and operate next-gen storage, so you're commercial right out the door. I could hook my UPS up to the grid and feed back, commercial success! > Wind and solar are as distributable and scaleable as you want. Not without storage, which is harder to scale than production of other kinds. > You don't need to worry about geological stability with wind and solar. I don't see the USP, there are plenty of geologically stable areas in most countries. > Wind and solar don't require tens or hundreds of megawatts of cold-start / post-operation (cooling) power. They have the added downside of only producing power when the weather guy says so. > Wind/solar don't generate waste that is weaponizeable. Good point, for now. > You d
Instead of using the money to research renewable or more efficient energy production, reduce pollution etc his foundation uses the money for vaccines and health services which surprisingly has as target, as he says in a ted video (link below), to decrease human population which he sees it as the major problem of today. ▶ this video "The world today has about 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15%"
TED talk - Elon musk - link D10 conference - Steve jobs and Bill gates - link TED talk - Bill gates (Innovation to Zero) - ▶ this video
None of those can replace coal / nuclear. EDIT: Here's Bill Gates explaining why nuclear is not optional: ▶ this video