What keeps a train on the track?
BoreMeScience1 HN recommender · recommended in 1 month, 2019-2022
191K views · 17 years ago · explainer · evergreen
A short clip of Richard Feynman explaining how a train stays on its tracks, through the conical shape of wheels and how it handles curves without differentials.
HN links it as a great, surprising explanation whenever rail wheels, gauge or curves come up.
2:27Feynman: How the train stays on the track FUN TO IMAGINE 7
Christopher Sykes
820K views • 18 years ago
3:57How Do Bikes Stay Up?
minutephysics
1.7M views • 11 years ago
11:22Most People Don't Know How Bikes Work
Veritasium
24.9M views • 4 years ago
2:39TMS Bicycle, stable without gyros or trail (TMS=two-mass-skate)
Arend Schwab
44K views • 15 years ago
15:53Why Railroads Don't Need Expansion Joints
Practical Engineering
5.3M views • 2 years ago
7:35Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!
Christopher Sykes
359K views • 8 years ago
1:06:50The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman
Christopher Sykes
5.9M views • 8 years ago
7:33Richard Feynman. Why.
firewalker
5.5M views • 14 years ago
55:55Richard Feynman - The.Character.of.Physical.Law - Part 2 (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
638K views • 15 years ago
9:47Feynman: Mathematicians versus Physicists
TehPhysicalist
882K views • 14 years ago
7:41Richard Feynman: Magnets and Why Questions
RichardFeynmanLove
26K views • 16 years ago
1:47The Counterintuitive Physics of Turning a Bike
minutephysics
855K views • 11 years ago
16:52Why Swiss Trains are the Best in Europe
Not Just Bikes
2.3M views • 4 years ago
8:25Calculating a Car Crash - Numberphile
Numberphile
446K views • 8 years ago
9:31Around The Corner - How Differential Steering Works (1937)
US Auto Industry
22.3M views • 17 years ago
1:06:50HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)
Christopher Sykes
712K views • 6 years ago
3:34Complete Solution To The Twins Paradox
minutephysics
2.3M views • 10 years ago
7:33Richard Feynman Magnets
nebulajr
999K views • 17 years ago
56:04Richard Feynman - The.Character of Physical Law - Part 1 The Law of Gravitation (full version)
Tinkerin' Thinkers
1.4M views • 15 years ago
7:33Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432
Christopher Sykes
1.6M views • 17 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
▶ this video (video of Feynman explaining how trains stay on the track) Is this it? I found it in my YouTube history. Or this one, which superimposes free body diagram (of forces) on the wheels to show how it is self stabilizing? link
> unlike the cylindrical profile which again just steers with the flange basically rubbing against the edge of the railhead. That's crazy. That means that the wheels are actually slipping when going around a corner, because the wheels are all the same diameter. Unlike conical wheels, which are essentially self-steering. Here's a great explanation by Richard Feynman: ▶ this video How could the BART trains possibly have cylindrical wheels? Conical wheels have been used on trains for ages, so that's seems weird. But doing some research, it seems that, yes, they were cylindrical: > Queensland Railways, for its first hundred years, used cylindrical wheels and vertical rails. With non-inclined rails and cylindrical wheels, the wheel squeal from trains taking curves on that railway was slight. After adopting coned wheels and inclined rails from the mid 1980s, the wheel squeal from trains curving at the same location and at the same speed decreased immensely. Some modern systems, such as Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) in San Francisco, use cylindrical wheels and flat-topped rails; BART is now switching to conical tread to reduce the noise caused by flange/rail contact and loss of adhesion of one of the wheels on curves. -- link
Snopes rates it as partly true, and the author is a pedantic killjoy. It is broadly true that for 2000 years European vehicles matched their roads and adapting existing vehicles to new technology led to using axles that were the same size. Do other gauges exist? Of course. Are the true elements of this worth repeating? Sure. As an unrelated aside here’s Richard Feynman explaining why train axles don’t need differentials. ▶ this video