Patreon CEO on Content Policy, Lauren Southern, and IGD
JackConteExtrasCited 4× on HN, 2017-2019
112K views · 9 years ago · commentary · news
Patreon CEO Jack Conte explains how Patreon thinks about content policy and why it removed the pages of Lauren Southern, members of Defend Europe and IGD. He also describes the company's trust and safety commitments.
HN commenters cite it as Patreon's own explanation of the ban, which they find reasonable and sincere.
1:10:59Patreon CEO On Lauren Southern, IGD, & Free Speech | Jack Conte | TECH | Rubin Report
The Rubin Report
147K views • 9 years ago
3:25:11Joe Rogan Experience #1258 - Jack Dorsey, Vijaya Gadde & Tim Pool
PowerfulJRE
10.1M views • 7 years ago
1:55:08Joe Rogan Experience #1236 - Jack Dorsey
PowerfulJRE
1.8M views • 7 years ago
0:49Psaki: 'We're Flagging Problematic Posts On Facebook That Spread Disinformation'
Newsweek
22K views • 5 years ago
10:40Copyright Deadlock (The Jimquisition)
Stephanie Sterling
773K views • 10 years ago
15:47VidMe or Why Platforms Aren't Your Friends
Folding Ideas
1M views • 9 years ago
42:50DEF CON 18 - Moxie Marlinspike - Changing Threats To Privacy: From TIA to Google
DEFCONConference
7K views • 13 years ago
6:59The Problem With Facebook
2veritasium
3.1M views • 12 years ago
9:01Youtube Takes Down CHESS PODCAST for Being HARMFUL or DANGEROUS
agadmator's Chess Channel
610K views • 6 years ago
3:51Reddit.com co-Founder Alexis Ohanian fires back at CNN and Anderson Cooper
tjandthetux
28K views • 15 years ago
3:37Why Web Filters Don't Work: Penistone and the Scunthorpe Problem
Tom Scott
3.6M views • 10 years ago
42:29YouTube's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is.
Tom Scott
9M views • 6 years ago
31:48YouTubers have to declare ads. Why doesn't anyone else?
Tom Scott
9.2M views • 5 years ago
3:46The Power Of Selling Out: Your Customers As Political Capital - Onion Talks - Ep. 9
The Onion
434K views • 13 years ago
55:39Founders@Google Presents: The Cultural Anthropology of Stack Exchange
Google TechTalks
12K views • 14 years ago
21:05Who is Manipulating Facebook? - Smarter Every Day 215
SmarterEveryDay
1M views • 7 years ago
16:34Steve Huffman (Reddit) | TNW Conference | Inside the Biggest Online Community
TNW
18K views • 10 years ago
41:35The Alt-Right Playbook: How to Radicalize a Normie
Innuendo Studios
4.5M views • 7 years ago
21:39I Confronted the People That BLOCKED My Video (Rant)
Rick Beato
1.9M views • 6 years ago
31:51Wikipedia co-founder: I no longer trust the website I created
UnHerd
290K views • 5 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
Manifest observable behavior is just an evidence-based way to determine breach of policy[0]. It's literally the most rational way to go about enforcing policy. Insofar as suspensions seem "random" because they're done by fast and loose algorithms (which are the only enforcement mechanism that scales), I agree though: that shit sucks, and it affects many sides. Many sides. When Zuckerberg was in front of Congress, he was repeatedly scolded by Congresspeople for not doing enough to remove bad stuff. He responded by saying that there's too much bad stuff for humans to keep track of, and that Facebook is working really hard on AI capable of handling it. Yay. 0: ▶ this video
I totally get where you're coming from. Though our conclusions differ, I think our reasoning is very similar. I doubt these bans are purely mercenary. The CEO of Patreon seems to be doing this because he believes it's the right thing. If you watch his video responding to the ban of Lauren Southern last year[1] (a decision I agree with, BTW), he seems totally sincere. He also understands the magnitude of his responsibility to patrons. I think Patreon is being penny wise and pound foolish. Their social signalling helps them grab a larger chunk of a smaller pie. Every high profile ban alienates a small fraction of users, but it's a different fraction every time. It doesn't take many before Patreon's reputation is bad enough to dissuade new creators from using it. It might already be too late for them to turn around. 1. ▶ this video
See ▶ this video , Patreon's presentation of evidence that they were blocking ships, and that Southern was actively involved. Note that this evidence is video that Southern herself published before she realized that these actions would endanger her own income stream, rather than just people in the ocean.
> I've seen Patreon kicking people off their platform for political reasons […] Have you? Are you thinking of Lauren Southern? Or maybe It's Going Down? The explanation from Patreon is very reasonable: ▶ this video