HackerTube
HomeLongsLikedHistoryWatch laterCategoriesPlaylistsSettings

International Colloquia #26: Fusion Reactor First Wall Cooling

MIT MechE Lectures & Colloquia2 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2021-2026
YouTube
10K views · 5 years ago · lecture · dated

An MIT colloquium by Dennis Whyte on power exhaust and first-wall cooling in fusion reactors, including recent innovations and the SPARC and ARC designs.

Recommended for realistic engineering detail on extracting heat from a tokamak.

Nuclear power & fusionMechanical & precision engineeringUniversity lectures & courses#fusion#tokamak#sparc#heatextraction#plasma

4 comments from Hacker News

@leonidasrup2026 · in “Company says nuclear fusion could power the grid – and soon”

There many technical changes which will have to be overcome for fusion to: 1. Produce long term stable plasma. SPARC should demonstrate this. Commonwealth Fusion Systems are confident that with the magnet properties of SPARC and the conservative parameters of the SPARC plasma they can demonstrate this. 2. Produce the prototype of a fusion power plant, the ARC reactor. Commonwealth Fusion Systems has to scale up the SPARC reactor. They have to not only design, but also build and test, reactor vessel which would allow useful heat recovery and tritium breeding. Tritium is hydrogen, very small molecule that has tendency do leak through smallest cracks. It can also cause hydrogen embrittlement. 3. Produce energy from fusion on commercial scale and at competitive prices. Reactor vessel is exposed to very strong magnetic field and as result large forces. The neutrons produced from D-T plasma have energy about 13 MeV and they cause faster material degradation than in fission power plants. It's possible that frequent replacements of the reactor vessel will be needed. The reactor vessel is neutron activated low-level radioactive waste, which has to be properly disposed of. The beryllium used in some designs is quite rare (world's annual production of beryllium is 220 tons). All this issues affect the economy of fusion power plant. I confident that all this non-trivial material and engineering changes will be solved and commercial fusion power plants will exist in 50-100 years. For quic

CitesView on HN
@leonidasrup2026 · in “Fusion Power Plant Simulator”

For those interested not only in simplified energy balance of a fusion power plant as shown in Fusion Power Plant Simulator, but in more realistic engineering of heat extraction from a tokamak I recommend the following lecture by Dr. Dennis Whyte from MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center. Fusion Reactor First Wall Cooling ▶ this video One of the designs uses 3D printed silicon carbide vacuum vessel cooled by a layer of molten lead and a layer of FLiBe (a molten salt made from a mixture of lithium fluoride (LiF) and beryllium fluoride (BeF2)). link The lithium component of FLiBe is used for breeding of the radioactive isotope tritium, which will be extracted from the salt and used for making the deuterium-tritium fuel of the tokamak.

RecommendsView on HN
@compumike2022 · in “Korean nuclear fusion reactor achieves 100M°C for 30 seconds”

"Fusion Reactor First Wall Cooling" ▶ this video talks about the steady-state heat transfer out of a proposed tokamak design. Around 1:09:23 they show "1.5 GW" deposited as "0.3 GW from radiative photons -> surface heating" plus "1.2 GW from 14.1 MeV neutrons -> volumetric heating". Designing the first wall and the volumetric blanket are, indeed, engineering challenges.

CitesView on HN
@vjaswal2021 · in “The Truth About Nuclear Fusion Q Factors”

I've seen various youtube videos from their employees and CEO. From what I remember, Dennis Whyte (head of the fusion lab at MIT and CFS cofounder) says you need about Q>5 at least, to make fusion economically viable. So that must mean Qplasma > 5. SPARC is working towards that by 2025. And so far, the company, CFS, has been achieving their milestones for the performance of their magnets. The HTS magnets and coils is the main ingredient that the startup is optimizing for. Sometime in the last year, they implied that their Qplasma was much better than they minimally hoped for. I think they achieved Qplasma > 10, but Dennis was keeping the details proprietary. From all the talks I remember, they are targeting power on the grid with the ARC reactor by 2035. Edit: This is the best recent video I've seen, about SPARC and ARC. Jumped to 2:25 for Dennis Whyte. ▶ this video It's targeted to MechE students and gives a lot of details about other aspects of a potential ARC reactor design, e.g. how to get the heat out.

RecommendsView on HN
Breakthrough in  Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte1:38:49

Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte

MIT Club of Northern California
1.1M views • 10 years ago
MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig1:11:40

MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig

MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
122K views • 9 years ago
Modular Micro-Reactors – The Future of Nuclear Energy?20:38

Modular Micro-Reactors – The Future of Nuclear Energy?

Illinois EnergyProf
169K views • 6 years ago
A New Way to Achieve Nuclear Fusion: Helion30:48

A New Way to Achieve Nuclear Fusion: Helion

Real Engineering
8.4M views • 3 years ago
Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 204015:42

Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040

Improbable Matter
2M views • 5 years ago
Wendelstein 7-X – from concept to reality10:31

Wendelstein 7-X – from concept to reality

Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
497K views • 12 years ago
The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor:  What Fusion Wanted To Be55:17

The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor: What Fusion Wanted To Be

Google TechTalks
390K views • 17 years ago
Q&A - Helion Energy, NIF, Space and more3:19:02

Q&A - Helion Energy, NIF, Space and more

Improbable Matter
151K views • 3 years ago
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)1:32:38

Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)

GoogleTalksArchive
23K views • 14 years ago
Thorium: An energy solution - THORIUM REMIX 20111:59:59

Thorium: An energy solution - THORIUM REMIX 2011

gordonmcdowell
804K views • 15 years ago
Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)35:50

Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)

Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...1:32:44

Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...

Google TechTalks
74K views • 19 years ago
The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)36:02

The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)

Google TechTalks
663K views • 14 years ago
How close is nuclear fusion power?12:50

How close is nuclear fusion power?

Sabine Hossenfelder
764K views • 5 years ago
The Economics of Nuclear Energy16:11

The Economics of Nuclear Energy

Real Engineering
2M views • 6 years ago
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor1:22:09

Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor

Google TechTalks
164K views • 17 years ago
The Ridiculous Engineering Of Jet Engines39:34

The Ridiculous Engineering Of Jet Engines

Veritasium
16.8M views • 11 months ago
Nuclear Propulsion in Space23:49

Nuclear Propulsion in Space

US National Archives
192K views • 9 years ago
The problems with Helion Energy - a response to Real Engineering7:17

The problems with Helion Energy - a response to Real Engineering

Improbable Matter
912K views • 3 years ago
KSP Doesn't Teach: Rocket Engine Plumbing16:19

KSP Doesn't Teach: Rocket Engine Plumbing

Scott Manley
1.1M views • 10 years ago