Modular Micro-Reactors – The Future of Nuclear Energy?
Illinois EnergyProf3 HN recommenders · recommended in 2 months, 2020-2021
169K views · 6 years ago · lecture · dated
Professor Ruzic explains modular micro-reactors: self-contained nuclear units with passive safety whose fuel lasts about 20 years. He covers their use for process and district heat and where they can compete with diesel generation.
Recommended as a clear technical explanation of micro-reactor fuel, safety and economics, from a channel HN trusts on nuclear topics.
15:42Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040
Improbable Matter
2M views • 5 years ago
1:16:56International Colloquia #26: Fusion Reactor First Wall Cooling
MIT MechE Lectures & Colloquia
10K views • 5 years ago
35:50Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Energy (Live Lecture)
Illinois EnergyProf
342K views • 5 years ago
23:10Economics of Nuclear Reactor
Illinois EnergyProf
921K views • 7 years ago
40:40Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?
Google TechTalks
75K views • 15 years ago
16:11The Economics of Nuclear Energy
Real Engineering
2M views • 6 years ago
10:31Wendelstein 7-X – from concept to reality
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
497K views • 12 years ago
1:11:40MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
122K views • 9 years ago
22:47Is Nuclear Energy Green?
Sabine Hossenfelder
1M views • 4 years ago
1:38:49Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte
MIT Club of Northern California
1.1M views • 10 years ago
3:19:02Q&A - Helion Energy, NIF, Space and more
Improbable Matter
151K views • 3 years ago
1:32:38Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)
GoogleTalksArchive
23K views • 14 years ago
55:17The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor: What Fusion Wanted To Be
Google TechTalks
390K views • 17 years ago
1:32:44Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...
Google TechTalks
74K views • 19 years ago
12:50How close is nuclear fusion power?
Sabine Hossenfelder
764K views • 5 years ago
18:14We Solved Nuclear Waste Decades Ago
Kyle Hill
4.5M views • 4 years ago
20:29Why I changed my mind about nuclear power | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxBerlin
TEDx Talks
2.3M views • 8 years ago
12:32chernobyl 2013: radioactive ant bites & 115 mSv/h of pure gamma radiation
bionerd23
604K views • 12 years ago
17:33Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia
TEDx Talks
5.7M views • 7 years ago
13:04The Big Lie About Nuclear Waste
Cleo Abram
4.8M views • 3 years ago
6 comments from Hacker News
All of these systems are going to require radical construction of hundreds and hundreds of nuclear reactors. This has economics of scale benefits, and I expect reactors such as the ones discussed in this video: ▶ this video to be produced on a factory line extremely quickly.
You should watch this video (and several others) of this professor, David Ruzic from Uni of Illinois This video he talks about the economics of nuclear plant. link This video, he talks about modular micro-nuclear reactor ▶ this video His videos are great. Worth your time.
Think of smaller nuclear reactors as an option for places where renewables might not make sense, like in mining. Building power generation that costs 10x some renewable source will never make sense. However, building small scale nuclear as replacement for onsite diesel generators could make a whole lot of sense. Illinois Energy Prof has a good video on this => ▶ this video
Illinois EnergyProf recently did a video on USNC's design: ▶ this video (Though I think he used audio from the wrong microphone; the earlier videos sound much better.)
If you have 20 minutes, the video linked in the comments of the earlier HN post is quite informative, giving a much better technical explanation than the original article: ▶ this video It is fascinating, for example, how a slight change in the packaging of the fuel (as sand-sized pellets coated with carbon) affects the safety/stability of the design, and how resonances in the cross section for neutron absorption come into play (they broaden at higher temperatures, dampening rather than enhancing the overall reaction speed, as temperatures rise).
From the press release link "NuScale spent over $500 million, with the backing of Fluor, and over 2 million labor hours to develop the information needed to prepare its DCA application" Not cheap :) On scaling down reactors to micro size (nuscale is kind of larger) and costs: ▶ this video $0.25/kWh until large series (17mn30s).