BlueHat Seattle 2019 || Guarding Against Physical Attacks: The Xbox One Story
Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)2 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2020-2026
7K views · 7 years ago · talk · evergreen
Tony Chen of Microsoft explains at BlueHat Seattle 2019 how the Xbox One was designed to resist physical attacks. He covers the security design and hypervisor-based OS architecture that kept the console uncracked for years.
HN recommends it as a fascinating, authoritative account of console hardware security, often cited in threads on hardware security and anti-cheat.
58:05Guarding Against Physical Attacks: The Xbox One Story — Tony Chen, Microsoft
Platform Security Summit
95K views • 7 years ago
56:5034C3 - Console Security - Switch
media.ccc.de
135K views • 8 years ago
53:44Console Hacking 2016 (33c3)
media.ccc.de
166K views • 9 years ago
54:35BlueHat IL 2023 - David Weston - Default Security
Microsoft Israel R&D Center
47K views • 3 years ago
44:1127c3: Console Hacking 2010 (en)
Christiaan008
33K views • 15 years ago
51:00GOD MODE UNLOCKED - Hardware Backdoors in x86 CPUs
Black Hat
319K views • 8 years ago
1:02:52Joanna Rutkowska: Towards (reasonably) trustworthy x86 laptops
media.ccc.de
27K views • 10 years ago
46:04DEF CON 26 - Christopher Domas - GOD MODE UNLOCKED Hardware Backdoors in redacted x86
DEFCONConference
86K views • 8 years ago
5:01How a Laser-Shot Disk Defeats Hackers & Pirates (Coding Secrets)
GameHut
132K views • 8 years ago
54:51Keynote - Karen Sandler
Linux.conf.au 2012 -- Ballarat, Australia
20K views • 14 years ago
50:06Protected KVM on Arm64: A Technical Deep Dive - Quentin Perret, Google
The Linux Foundation
6K views • 4 years ago
44:40DCEmu Reviews - 27C3 - Chaos Communication Congress 2010 - fail0verflow - FULL VIDEO
1KIND Reviews
47K views • 15 years ago
53:0236C3 - A systematic evaluation of OpenBSD's mitigations
media.ccc.de
18K views • 6 years ago
33:41OffensiveCon19 - Alex Ionescu - Keynote - Reversing Without Reversing
OffensiveCon
20K views • 7 years ago
52:43DEFCON 19: Introduction to Tamper Evident Devices
Christiaan008
352K views • 15 years ago
58:11The new Windows subsystem for Linux architecture: a deep dive - BRK3068
Microsoft Developer
188K views • 7 years ago
51:13Qubes OS: The Operating System That Can Protect You Even If You Get Hacked
Micah Lee
63K views • 8 years ago
44:29Behind the scenes of iOS and Mac Security
Black Hat
36K views • 6 years ago
46:34The Memory Sinkhole - Unleashing An X86 Design Flaw Allowing Universal Privilege Escalation
Black Hat
169K views • 10 years ago
14:26OSCON 2011: Karen Sandler
O'Reilly
15K views • 15 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
Given that it held up against 13 years of dedicated efforts by people with physical access to the device, many years after its successor was launched, it seems merited in this case. This talk about some of what went into it is fascinating: ▶ this video
Everything is very much separated. It's actually a series of OSes running in a hypervisor. link ▶ this video (for software discussion check around the 19:00 mark but the whole talk is incredible)
> It is an interesting attack but is the above goal ever achievable? To protect against adversaries from the inside. People have gotten very close to achieving similar goals. For example, modern games consoles' anti-piracy measures guard against the device owner who has physical control and unlimited time. [1] iPhone activation locks likewise prevent stolen phones from being used, even by thieves with physical control and unlimited time. And neither of the systems rely on the clunky 'brick the device if the case is opened' methods of yesteryear. (Of course there have also been a great many failed attempts - almost every console since the dawn of time has eventually been hacked, as have things like TPMs and TrustZone, many versions of the iPhone were rooted, etc etc) [1] ▶ this video
> Why else would they design it for the xbox, of all things? If you really want to know the answer, here's the lead engineer explaining it en detail: ▶ this video