LSV Breaks MTGO
TCGplayerCited 4× on HN, 2017-2023
323K views · 14 years ago · demo · evergreen
Pro Magic player Luis Scott-Vargas triggers a mandatory-action infinite loop on Magic Online, and the game stalls in a non-terminating state.
Cited as the real-world example of an inescapable loop in Magic: The Gathering, in discussions of its Turing completeness.
22:54I Built a COMPUTER in Magic: The Gathering
Because Science
2M views • 7 years ago
1:11Infinite Mario AI - Long Level
Robin Baumgarten
1.3M views • 17 years ago
19:31Math Magic
Vsauce
14M views • 10 years ago
42:3630 Weird Chess Algorithms: Elo World
suckerpinch
965K views • 7 years ago
39:47How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy Explained
Stand-up Maths
8.4M views • 5 years ago
6:33epic conway's game of life
Rational Animations
5.6M views • 15 years ago
34:00Math's Fundamental Flaw
Veritasium
30.8M views • 5 years ago
30:06"Tackling Concurrency Bugs with TLA+" by Hillel Wayne
Strange Loop Conference
24K views • 9 years ago
46:22"Clojure in Unity 3D: Functional Video Game Development" by Ramsey Nasser and Tims Gardner
Strange Loop Conference
24K views • 12 years ago
6:14Turing & The Halting Problem - Computerphile
Computerphile
919K views • 12 years ago
42:43"Propositions as Types" by Philip Wadler
Strange Loop Conference
143K views • 11 years ago
11:39The Unbeatable Game from the 60s: Dr NIM
Stand-up Maths
7.2M views • 10 years ago
4:22SIGBOVIK 2007: Generalized Super Mario Bros. is NP-Complete
suckerpinch
84K views • 18 years ago
1:10:00The Mental Game of Python - Raymond Hettinger
SF Python
131K views • 7 years ago
54:53Miguel de Icaza: Swift Godot: Fixing the Multi-million dollar mistake #GodotCon2023
Godot Engine
27K views • 3 years ago
7:09This Arcade Game is a SCAM (I have proof)
Mark Rober
51.4M views • 8 years ago
16:18Computer program that learns to play classic NES games
suckerpinch
2.2M views • 13 years ago
2:49Feynman :: Rules of Chess
defjam99b
1.4M views • 19 years ago
5:34On The Turing Completeness of PowerPoint (SIGBOVIK)
Tom Wildenhain
1.2M views • 9 years ago
53:58GDC 2010: Sid Meier Keynote - "Everything You Know is Wrong"
GameSpot
101K views • 16 years ago
4 comments from Hacker News
There’s never a time where players can’t interact - just passing priority or putting triggered abilities on the stack are actions. And each time this could happen the game checks state based actions to see if someone has won. That said, if both players have no options or just pass (which is more pronounced online) then you can end up in inescapable loops that cause draws. A classic example is this Luis Scott-Vargas game: ▶ this video
> Regarding the oblivion ring loop, there's an example of it being used on MTGO, which doesn't end well (basically seems to crash the server and/or client): ▶ this video Oh wow, I should have realized that somebody would try it out online just to see what happens! I'm not surprised it ends up with some sort of clash; given that it's Turing complete, the game engine obviously can't detect whether a current state will end up halting or not... > And here's the paper on the latest turing machine construction in mtg: link Awesome, thanks! I'll definitely check that out
That rule is exactly where the the construction used becomes interesting: it's built in such a way so that if the turing machine halts, the player who set it up wins the game. If it doesn't, by the rule above, it's a draw. So it's fundamentally impossible to tell the result of an arbitrary setup (and in practice you could set it up such that it halts iff some unknown conjecture is true). Regarding the oblivion ring loop, there's an example of it being used on MTGO, which doesn't end well (basically seems to crash the server and/or client): ▶ this video And here's the paper on the latest turing machine construction in mtg: link
There's also the infamous video of (well-known professional player) Luis Scott-Vargas "breaking" MTGO by causing the game to wind up in a non-terminating loop of mandatory actions: ▶ this video For those who are confused, the card involved there is Oblivion Ring: link Its effect is that, when it comes into play, you choose a non-land card in play that gets exiled (removed from play) for as long as Oblivion Ring stays in play, then gets returned once Oblivion Ring leaves play. This game devolves into a situation where there are three Oblivion Rings and no other non-land cards, so: Ring 1 exiles Ring 2, which returns Ring 3, which exiles Ring 1, which returns Ring 2, which exiles Ring 3, which returns Ring 1, which exiles Ring 2, and so on to infinity. The rules state that when a loop like this occurs (which is not often in real play), the game is an automatic draw.