How To Tell Someone They Sound Racist
Jay SmoothCited 9× on HN, 2011-2021
1.5M views · 18 years ago · commentary · evergreen
Jay Smooth's short video on how to tell someone their words sound racist. He argues for focusing on what the person said or did rather than labeling who they are.
HN commenters cite it in arguments about criticism, to separate attacking a comment from attacking a person.
1:11:18The New Religion Of Anti-Racism: A Conversation with John McWhorter (Episode #217)
Sam Harris
376K views • 6 years ago
1:54Barack Obama takes on 'woke' call-out culture: 'That's not activism'
Guardian News
1.7M views • 7 years ago
17:41I made a talking banana
Useless Duck Company
622K views • 8 years ago
10:25How to Get Good at Small Talk, and Even Enjoy It
Harvard Business Review
2.7M views • 3 years ago
21:03Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are | Amy Cuddy | TED
TED
29.4M views • 14 years ago
6:46The surprising pattern behind color names around the world
Vox
8.4M views • 9 years ago
6:47The US Has More Tribes Than the World Has Countries
CGP Grey
7.3M views • 6 years ago
1:45When Wokes and Racists Actually Agree on Everything
Ryan Long
11.1M views • 6 years ago
27:18Vocal Fry: what it is, who does it, and why people hate it!
Dr Geoff Lindsey
4.1M views • 3 years ago
2:58Word Association - Saturday Night Live
Saturday Night Live
4.1M views • 13 years ago
1:14McCain Counters Obama 'Arab' Question
Associated Press
1.6M views • 18 years ago
1:15:05The Stuff of Thought | Steven Pinker | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
419K views • 19 years ago
1:40Exclusive: Lee Atwater's Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy
The Nation
590K views • 13 years ago
29:56Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism
Channel 4 News
52.2M views • 8 years ago
10:54RSA ANIMATE: Language as a Window into Human Nature
Royal Society of Arts
1.6M views • 15 years ago
1:21Yale University Students Protest Halloween Costume Email (VIDEO 3)
FIRE
1.9M views • 11 years ago
5:25Does the language you speak change how you think?
Tom Scott
1.6M views • 3 years ago
18:53Why I, as a black man, attend KKK rallies. | Daryl Davis | TEDxNaperville
TEDx Talks
13M views • 8 years ago
1:45What Languages Sound Like To Foreigners
Sara Forsberg
22.6M views • 12 years ago
5:33The Hidden Rules of Conversation
Tom Scott
5.8M views • 6 years ago
9 comments from Hacker News
The point was you said it was intended to poke fun at traditional chivalry like it was a fact. But it was just your speculation. We define chivalrous differently apparently. And I never heard of someone trying to flatter a 21 year old man by wishing him a happy 60th birthday. What they said and what kind of person they are are 2 different discussions.[1] Well meaning people accept constructive criticism. I know people who would like what you wrote better. I know people who would think telling them you're sure they didn't mean something was insincere and condescending. The 1st reply that mentioned the attempted joke just said please don't make sexist comments.[2] It was appropriate for an aside on a technical mailing list. The joker could have replied off list if they didn't understand. They doubled down instead like you said. Someone else called it cancel culture and called other people hypocrites. Someone else compared it to witch burning. Someone else implied assuming good intentions meant ignoring anything unintentionally objectionable. The reaction to that was someone proposed a different standard. The reaction to that was trolling. [1] ▶ this video [2] link
You're turning a discussion about what someone did into a discussion about who they are.[1] [1] ▶ this video
They didn't say or ask if he turned into a misogynist. The question is about what he said. Not what he is.[1] [1] ▶ this video
When telling someone that something they said was racist, it's important to keep it focused not on the person but the act. Racism and prejudice is learned, and it can certainly be unlearned. Unfortunately, you cannot unlearn mental illness. ▶ this video
The developers are not racist. My entire original point is their attitudes and intents were irrelevant. The system they created is very much racist, completely independent about how they felt in creating it; I'm not sure how you can really dispute that. The venerable Jay Smooth describes a closely-related distinction here[0]. Also, when you describe a system as racist that's somewhat different from describing a person as racist, which might be a place we're talking past each other. Re: the culture/race/ethnicity terminology quagmire, the sister comment by dragonwriter explains it well. [0] ▶ this video
For those of you who think I was wrong to suggest that jellicle's statement was uncomfortably racist: we might have to agree to disagree, here. The vast majority of street food is run by immigrants, and it's a perfect entry point for them to get into the local economy they have chosen to make their home in. People who were born here are smart to use the food truck as a way to test a concept before they try it in a restaurant format. Perhaps we'll see that happening more and more. There's certainly all cultures represented in Portland. Meanwhile, we're all immigrants here unless you come from native background. I don't think the original commenter is a racist person, but his comment comparing food trucks to parasites is uncomfortable at best and shameful at worst. Here's a test: go ask 100 food truck operators if they think some guy on a tech forum calling food trucks "parasites" is racist, and get back to us. ▶ this video
If you replace the instances of "white men" with "mainstream white culture" his arguments are much stronger and I believe to be his original intent. "And it’s not a matter of generalizing white people, rather it’s being real about the culture San Francisco creates." The author is angry that white culture perpetuates racism and privilege, which himself and other cultural minorities are now forced to tolerate at their workplace. His choice of words was obviously inappropriate and while I'm not excusing how his point was said I don't believe it was his intention to make his point using racist statements. This is a classic example of "What you said was racist VS. You are a racist": ▶ this video
> Let's assume for a while that Arrington was really racist Even if that were true, the last thing you should do is call him one. ▶ this video If someone makes a racist comment, attack the comment, not the person.
as near as i could read, no one was attacking Noah -- just Noah's behavior, which seems out of line. See the "i'm not calling you a racist, i'm calling your behavior racist" crucial line of distinction. ( ▶ this video ) Noah can be a sweet, helpful, lovable teddy bear, and still have behavior that needs to be called out.