Meaningful Play: Getting Gamification Right
Google TechTalks3 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2012-2014
118K views · 15 years ago · talk · dated
A Google Tech Talk by Sebastian Deterding on gamification. It looks at what points and badges get wrong and what lessons game design offers for non-game applications.
HN commenters recommend it as a thoughtful take on doing gamification and game design well.
2:44:28Talk: Video Games and the Future of Education
Jonathan Blow
130K views • 6 years ago
1:44:09Jonathan Blow: Video Games and the Human Condition
rubbermuck
158K views • 15 years ago
48:27Jonathan Blow: Game design: the medium is the message
CreativeMornings HQ
119K views • 13 years ago
7:39Propaganda Games: Sesame Credit - The True Danger of Gamification - Extra Credits
Extra Credits
2M views • 10 years ago
1:04:25Practical Creativity
GDC Festival of Gaming
355K views • 9 years ago
1:17:21Sid Meier's Psychology of Game Design
GDC Festival of Gaming
137K views • 10 years ago
20:38What Games Are Like For Someone Who Doesn't Play Games
Razbuten
16.9M views • 7 years ago
6:58The Skinner Box - How Games Condition People to Play More - Extra Credits
Extra Credits
1.2M views • 14 years ago
19:49Let’s go whaling: Tricks for monetising mobile game players with free-to-play
PocketGamerbiz
757K views • 10 years ago
21:19Manufactured Discontent and Fortnite
Folding Ideas
1.7M views • 7 years ago
34:13The Addictive Cost Of Predatory Videogame Monetization (The Jimquisition)
Stephanie Sterling
1.3M views • 7 years ago
1:00:29Playing to Lose: AI and "Civilization" (Soren Johnson)
Google TechTalks
67K views • 16 years ago
53:58GDC 2010: Sid Meier Keynote - "Everything You Know is Wrong"
GameSpot
101K views • 16 years ago
12:02Nintendo - Putting Play First
Game Maker's Toolkit
997K views • 9 years ago
25:09The Next Major RTS Will Fail. This Is Why.
GiantGrantGames
985K views • 4 years ago
44:23The Immoral Design of Diablo Immortal
Josh Strife Hayes
4.4M views • 4 years ago
15:38Juice it or lose it - a talk by Martin Jonasson & Petri Purho
grapefrukt
616K views • 14 years ago
4:23The User is Drunk
squareweave
275K views • 13 years ago
14:05TUN: Un-Ruining the MMO
MrBtongue
291K views • 13 years ago
59:47Failing to Fail: The Spiderweb Software Way
GDC Festival of Gaming
570K views • 8 years ago
3 comments from Hacker News
I'd argue that all 'games' are about manipulating attention - its just a question of what means they use to do so. Game design is really a sort of meta-game about designing systems that effect the behavior of players. Consider: Game Mechanics and Mechanism Design ( link ) I'm fully with you on the notion that we shouldn't be manipulating players life like farmville. Johnathan blow put on a great talk about games and the human condition where he covers this aspect quite scathingly: link To completely ignore this aspect is to develop a game with no real-stickyness factor. Money aside, don't you want a game that people enjoy playing? The entire point of an MMO is to have a large reoccurring user-base. There is an art to it, and getting it right can make really powerful games: ▶ this video For board games like chess, much of the appeal for the average player is that you get to sit down with a friend and compete, and in doing so the 'intellectual nature' of the game ends up pulling them in for the long term. Perhaps the answer to the meta-game of stickiness is to create a community around the game in a similar vein to the one from the ants ai challenge's forums. Were I to work on this project, I'd make a strong push toward git-like integration ala the work done behind KhanAcademy's live editor like discussed in this talk: link . - being able to share code behaviors with your team-mates (you are going to implement a guilds system, no?) and encourage discussions about behaviors at
The concept is very interesting.. But this is a bad introduction =( Saw a presentation a while ago that hooked me, can't watch it now, but think it was this one: ▶ this video link
There is so much truth packed into that 36 mins -- so many juxtapositions -- it would take several hours to reference them all. For starters, see Rich Hickey's talk on "Hammock-Driven Development" for more on the "background mind" ( link ), and then see how what Dan Pink is saying about motivation ( link ) and what Sebastian Deterding is saying about gamification ( ▶ this video ) all connect into what Cleese is saying about creativity.